中国让与担保实务问题研究
Research on the Practice of Transferring Guarantee in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
让与担保最初起源于罗马法上的信托行为理论,但因其自身固有的缺陷逐渐暴露,被质权制度、抵押制度等其他担保方式所代替。让与担保作为现代担保物权制度的发端,由于其强大的社会功能逐渐展露,又开始在后世的司法实务界复兴。尤其在以德国为代表的国家和地区被广泛应用,而日本有关让与担保的理论研究和实际应用也已然趋于完善。在我国,《物权法》草案审议过程中,围绕让与担保是否应当“入法”、选择何种方式“入法”的问题,我国民法学术界展开了激烈的讨论,至今未果。但是,让与担保在我国现实实务中已然存在各种问题,需要我们一一解决。让与担保是一种与抵押权、质权不同的新型担保物权,并且通过各个视角下中国让与担保在实务中出现的问题,以框架规制为视角提出了解决方案。同时,笔者结合让与担保的学理问题,对两例让与担保典型案例进行探讨分析。最后,经过让与担保在中国的可行性论证,笔者主张基于担保权构成论,鉴于让与担保标的的广泛性和方式的非典型性,中国应当采取兼顾理论逻辑性和现实实用性的民事特别法模式来规制让与担保,根本性的解决让与担保在实务中存在的问题。
Abstract
The transferring guaranteein Romebut because ofinherent defectsreplaced by theof pledge,and otherway. The transferring guaranteetheof modernright for securitybecause of itsong social functiongradually revealed, beganthe judicial practice of RenaissanceIn particular,widely usedGermany as the representative of theand regions, theresearch and practical applicationguaranteeJapantended to improve. In our country, In thelaw"consideration of the draft, aroundtransferring guaranteebe"into the law", choose which way "into the law", the academic circlescivil law in our countryunched a fierce debate, so far no results. But, the transferring guaranteeproblemsreality of our countrythe practice,need toby one. Transferring guarantee is a kind of new real rights for security different from mortgage and pledge,by the perspective of China under each make and guarantee problems arise in practice, In the perspective of the framework regulation puts forward the solutions. At the same time, the author let doctrinal issues guarantees for two cases of collateral typical case discussion and analysis.Finally, after transferring guarantee feasibility in China, The author claimed on composition of the security right, given the make and guarantee the subject of extensive and atypical way, China should take into account the theoretical logic and practical usefulness of the civil special law to regulate the mode of collateral, fundamental solution to the problem of the existence of the guarantee in practice.
참고문헌 (24)
- 梁慧星, "中国民法典草案建议稿附理由物权编" (2004), 法律出版社
- 王泽鉴, "民法学说与判例研究" (1998), 中国政法大学出版社
- 邹海林, "常敏, 债权担保的理论与实务" (2005), 社会科学文献出版社
- 王利明, "物权法论" (2008), 中国政法大学出版社
- 向逢春, "让与担保制度研究" (2013), 法律出版社
- 田土城, "担保制度比较研究" (2001), 河南大学出版社
- 陈本寒, "担保物权法比较研究" (2003), 武汉大学出版社
- 陈祥健, "担保物权研究" (2004), 中国检察出版社
- 谢在全, "民法物权论(下册)" (2011), 中国政法大学出版社
- 近江幸治, "担保物权法" (2000), 法律出版社
- 王闯, "让与担保法律制度研究" (2000), 法律出版社
- 陈本寒, "担保物权法比较研究" (2003), 武汉大学出版社
- 陈荣隆, "让与担保的法律构成(上)", 月旦法学杂志, (96) (2003)
- 梁曙明, "借贷关系中签订房屋买卖合同并备案登记属于让与担保", 人民司法, (6) (2014)
- 王建源, "民商法论丛(第10卷)" (1998), 法律出版社
- 刘龙, "本案股权让与担保合同应认定有效", 人民司法, (16) (2014)
- 王闯, "关于让与担保的司法态度及实务问题之解决", 人民司法, (16) (2014)
- 林承铎, "让与担保与物权法的协调性问题探析", 理论专刊, (11) (2013)
- 向逢春, "让与担保性质研究", 南京大学法律评论, 秋季 (2013)
- 裘雪婷, "我国融资融券担保法律制度架构分析", 海南金融, (3) (2012)
- 李开国, "关于中国物权法体系结构的思考", 现代法学, (4) (2002)
- 尹田, "物权法定原则批判之思考", 法学杂志, (25) (2004)
- 何艳春, "我国金融创新的让与担保法律问题分析", 证券法苑, (2) (2011)
- 梅瑞琦, "让与担保制度法律构成初探", 浙江工商大学学报, (3) (2009)
