금속 3D 프린팅 공정 최적화를 통한 H13 공구강 조형체의 기계적 특성 향상
Mechanical Property Improvement of the H13 Tool Steel Sculptures Built by Metal 3D Printing Process via Optimum Conditions
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, H13 tool steel sculptures are built by a metal 3D printing process at various laser scan speeds. The properties of commercial H13 tool steel powders are confirmed for the metal 3D printing process used: powder bed fusion (PBF), which is a selective laser melting (SLM) process. Commercial H13 powder has an excellent flowability of 16.68 s/50 g with a Hausner ratio of 1.25 and a density of 7.68 g/cm3. The sculptures are built with dimensions of 10 × 10 × 10 mm3 in size using commercial H13 tool steel powder. The density measured by the Archimedes method is 7.64 g/cm3, similar to the powder density of 7.68 g/cm3. The hardness is measured by Rockwell hardness equipment 5 times to obtain a mean value of 54.28 HRC. The optimum process conditions in order to build the sculptures are a laser power of 90 W, a layer thickness of 25 μm, an overlap of 30%, and a laser scan speed of 200 mm/s.
Abstract
In this study, H13 tool steel sculptures are built by a metal 3D printing process at various laser scan speeds. The properties of commercial H13 tool steel powders are confirmed for the metal 3D printing process used: powder bed fusion (PBF), which is a selective laser melting (SLM) process. Commercial H13 powder has an excellent flowability of 16.68 s/50 g with a Hausner ratio of 1.25 and a density of 7.68 g/cm3. The sculptures are built with dimensions of 10 × 10 × 10 mm3 in size using commercial H13 tool steel powder. The density measured by the Archimedes method is 7.64 g/cm3, similar to the powder density of 7.68 g/cm3. The hardness is measured by Rockwell hardness equipment 5 times to obtain a mean value of 54.28 HRC. The optimum process conditions in order to build the sculptures are a laser power of 90 W, a layer thickness of 25 μm, an overlap of 30%, and a laser scan speed of 200 mm/s.
참고문헌 (19)
- B. Cheng, , Addtive Manuf., ADDMA, 90, pp.1~ (2016)
- M. J. Matthews, , Acta Mater., 114, pp.33~ (2016)
- A. Ladewig, , Additive Manuf., 10, pp.1~ (2016)
- D. Herzog, , Acta Mater., 117, pp.371~ (2016)
- L. Parry, , Additive Manuf., 12, pp.1~ (2016)
- P. Feng, , Construct Build Mater., 93, pp.486~ (2015)
- D. Geldart, , China Particuology, 4, pp.104~ (2006)
- R. O. GREY, , Powder Tech., 2, pp.323~ (1969)
- C. J. Etti, , Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia., 2, pp.120~ (2014)
- H. Y. Jung, , Mater. Des., 86, pp.703~ (2015)
- L. J. Jallo, , Powder Tech., 204, pp.63~ (2010)
- Y. Meng, , J. Mater. Process. Tech., 212, pp.1731~ (2012)
- A. J. Pinkerton, , Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 25, pp.471~ (2005)
- D. Geldart, , Powder Tech., 190, pp.70~ (2009)
- E. C. Abdullah, , Powder Tech., 102, pp.151~ (1999)
- G. Petzow, "AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR METALS", pp.62~ (1978), Metals Park
- M. Das, , Scripta Mater., 63, pp.438~ (2010)
- G. Telasang, , Surf. Coat. Tech., 258, pp.1108~ (2014)