경제민주화와 노동법
The Economic Democratization and the Labor Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the modern society, the technological innovation, economic growth, majoring corporates and development of multinational corporates have caused the increase in the social responsibilities of the corporates. Therefore, it is not considered to be important to mediate the conflicting claims of the parties concerned and for the employees, who are directly in charge of the production, to speak up. Therefore, the future-oriented paradigm shift to the employee participation in management system is positively considered to bring the benefits to both employees and corporates. In Korea, the progressive civil society has created a bond of sympathy in the general and presidential elections in 2012 with the 3 major topics of ‘economic democratization,’ ‘universal welfare state’ and ‘enhancement of labor power.’ As the administration of Park GeunHye came into power, the ‘economic democratization’ has become the major concern and the relevant action plans were announced. Ever since the 1960’s the main issues of economic democratization for the Western and North America economy were the democratization of workplaces, expansion of the industrial democracy and introduction of the employee participation in management system. At the same time, the interests in the income distribution, same as the profit distribution system, the co-determination system for the participation of employees in management, and the economic democratization that institutionalizes the participation of the board of directors of corporates have increased and the various relevant political measures were introduced. In general, ‘employee participation in management system’ means reflecting the opinions of employees and the labor union in making decisions for a corporate’s business issues and the concept is considered a comprehensive concept of participation in capitals, participation in benefits and participation in decision makings. Yet, this study focuses on the participation of employees and the representative labor union in decision makings in business management of corporations, precisely. Such employee participation system is considered to be a certain part of the labor-managment system in developed countries. Especially in 1974, the international labor organization had clarified that “the participation of employees in business management is no longer a matter of its implementation, but is of the method of its implementation.” In Korea, such system is promoted by Labor-Management Council, a committee (Article 3, regulations on the participation of employees and enhancement of cooperation) that pursues an enhancement of welfare for employees and a healthy development of corporations through the participations and cooperation of employees and the users. A weakness of the currently effective employee-employer agreement structure is that it is managed under an excessive pressure of the legal regulations. Accordingly, there is a necessity for the focus on the type of governmental support for establishing the trust between the employees and the employers, followed by the legal and structural improvement for the labor-management agreement structure. It is a well-known fact that there is an unfavorable relationship between the employees and the management corporates, of which the relationship is not being stabilized because of the disagreement and conflicts, and such relationship is holding Korean society back from taking a leap in terms of economic and social quality. Accordingly, the successful settlement of the employee participation system is considered to play an important role in turning such unfavorable labor-management relationship into a cooperative relationship by referring to the various examples from advanced countries of labor system.
Abstract
In the modern society, the technological innovation, economic growth, majoring corporates and development of multinational corporates have caused the increase in the social responsibilities of the corporates. Therefore, it is not considered to be important to mediate the conflicting claims of the parties concerned and for the employees, who are directly in charge of the production, to speak up. Therefore, the future-oriented paradigm shift to the employee participation in management system is positively considered to bring the benefits to both employees and corporates. In Korea, the progressive civil society has created a bond of sympathy in the general and presidential elections in 2012 with the 3 major topics of ‘economic democratization,’ ‘universal welfare state’ and ‘enhancement of labor power.’ As the administration of Park GeunHye came into power, the ‘economic democratization’ has become the major concern and the relevant action plans were announced. Ever since the 1960’s the main issues of economic democratization for the Western and North America economy were the democratization of workplaces, expansion of the industrial democracy and introduction of the employee participation in management system. At the same time, the interests in the income distribution, same as the profit distribution system, the co-determination system for the participation of employees in management, and the economic democratization that institutionalizes the participation of the board of directors of corporates have increased and the various relevant political measures were introduced. In general, ‘employee participation in management system’ means reflecting the opinions of employees and the labor union in making decisions for a corporate’s business issues and the concept is considered a comprehensive concept of participation in capitals, participation in benefits and participation in decision makings. Yet, this study focuses on the participation of employees and the representative labor union in decision makings in business management of corporations, precisely. Such employee participation system is considered to be a certain part of the labor-managment system in developed countries. Especially in 1974, the international labor organization had clarified that “the participation of employees in business management is no longer a matter of its implementation, but is of the method of its implementation.” In Korea, such system is promoted by Labor-Management Council, a committee (Article 3, regulations on the participation of employees and enhancement of cooperation) that pursues an enhancement of welfare for employees and a healthy development of corporations through the participations and cooperation of employees and the users. A weakness of the currently effective employee-employer agreement structure is that it is managed under an excessive pressure of the legal regulations. Accordingly, there is a necessity for the focus on the type of governmental support for establishing the trust between the employees and the employers, followed by the legal and structural improvement for the labor-management agreement structure. It is a well-known fact that there is an unfavorable relationship between the employees and the management corporates, of which the relationship is not being stabilized because of the disagreement and conflicts, and such relationship is holding Korean society back from taking a leap in terms of economic and social quality. Accordingly, the successful settlement of the employee participation system is considered to play an important role in turning such unfavorable labor-management relationship into a cooperative relationship by referring to the various examples from advanced countries of labor system.
참고문헌 (35)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2008), 박영사
- 김형배, "노동법" (2014), 박영사
- 이상윤, "노동법(제6판)" (2011), 法文社
- 임종률, "노동법" (2014), 박영사
- 하갑래, "집단적노동관계법" (2010), (주)중앙경제
- 김형배, "한국에 있어서의 노동법 패러다임의 전환", 노동법학, (28), pp.1~19 (2008), 한국노동법학회
- 현행노동관계법상 ‘근로자대표’의 중첩성과 이에 대한 기능조정을 위한 방안, "박종희", 한국노동연구원, ~ (1998)
- 이영면, "성공적인 노사협의회 운영의 영향요인에 대한 연구", 노동정책연구, 9(4), pp.83~118 (2009), 한국노동연구원
- 이원희, "노사관계에서의 참여법리 ―근로자의 참여를 통한 상생구조의 지향―", 노동법학, (17) (2003), 한국노동법학회
- 경영참여의 실태와 과제, "이주희", 한국노동연구원, ~ (2005)
- 이희성, "노동법" (2007), 도서출판 어화
- 이희성, "로스쿨 집단적노사관계법" (2011), 도서출판 어화
- Brox, "Arbeitsrecht" (2011)
- Franz, "Arbeitsrecht und Ökonomie", RdA (1999)
- Direct Participation and Organisational Change, Fashionable but Misunderstood? An Analysis of Recent Research in Europe, Japan and the USA, "Fröhlich, Dieter", ~ (1996)
- Fürstenberg, Friedrich, "Internatinal and Comparative Industrial Relations, A Study of Developed Market Economies" (1988), Allen & Unwin
- Fürstenberg, Friedrich, "Perspektiven der Mitbestimmung, Historische Erfahrungen und moderne Entwicklungen vor europäischem und globalem Hintergrund" (1999), Metropolis
- Hydro, Tsutomu, "Economic and Social Aspects of Industrial Relations" (1987)
- J. Schregle, "노동법의 제문제, 김치선박사 화갑기념논문집" (1983)
- Kahn-Freund, "Legal Framework", ~
- The Recent Transformation of Participatory Employment Practices in Japan, "Kato, Takao", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.NBER, Working Paper Series, No. 7965 (2000)
- Korsch, Karl, "Arbeitsrecht für Betriebsräte" (1972)
- Morishima, Motohiro, "Information Sharing and Collective Bargaining in Japan, Effects on Wage Negotiation", Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(3) (1991)
- Müller-Jentsch, Walter, "Industrielle Demokratie, Von der Repräsentativen Mitbestimmung zur direkten Partizipation", Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 45(6) (1994)
- Müller-Jentsch, Walther, "Auf dem Prüfstand. Das deutsche Modell der industriellen Beziehungen", Industrielle Beziehungen, 2(1) (1995)
- Müller-Jentsch, Walter, "Soziologie der idustriellen Beziehungen" (1997)
- Müller-Jentsch, Walther, "Handbuch zur Arbeitslehre" (1997), R. oldenbourg
- Nakamura, Keisuke, "Japanese Labour and Management in Transition, Diversity, Flexibility and Praticipation" (1997), Routledge
- Naphtali, Fritz, "Wirtschaftsdrmokratie, Ihr Wesen, Weg und Ziel" (1977)
- Odaka, Kunio, "Toward Industrial Democracy, Management and Workers in Modern Japan" (1975)
- Poole, Michael, "Concise Enczclopedia of Participation and Co-Management" (1992), Walter de Gruzter
- Poole, Michael, "The Origins of Economic Democracy: Profit-sharing and emplozee-shareholding schemes" (1989)
- Wollenberg, Jörg, "Mitbestimmung-Bilanz und Kritik", Arbeitsgruppe Alternative Wirtschaftspolitik, ~ (2002)
- Zöllner, "Arbeitsrecht" (2008)
- 日本勞働硏究機構, "勞使協議制", ~ (1994)
