본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기업경영과 노동법제 개선방안

Major Issues of Korean Labor Law in Business

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Present-day labor law, as a special law designed to protect employees' welfare, has a relatively short history. It came into existence only as a result of the modern industrial development and with it the rise of the status of employee(wage earner). The goals and objectives of labor legal studies have been the full realization of the workers economic and social rights, for which the specialty of labor law has been also stressed. The right to organization, particularly in Korea, has had dogmatic overtones, it seems to be dedicated to achieving enhanced legitimacy of labor union itself, rather than focusing on rectifying and supplementing contract theories based upon the simplistic version of market economy. The legal acknowledgement of labor union needs to be made through the coordination and rectification of the individual-oriented principle of "freedom of contract". I point out that it neglects to establish labor law as a mechanism, where labor and management can be interlinked to each other, by overstressed labor rights and the unfettered function of labor union, and disregarding the concerns of labor productivity and those of business competitiveness. Understanded the inseparable link between the enhancement of labor productivity and the improvement of working conditions, it is of great significance that every effort should be made to set up a paradigm of labor relations and labor law that can best accommodate the contemporary needs to have both labor and management work in collaboration with each other, as well as to eliminate repressive tones of unconstitutional labor law clauses. Although it may be difficult to meet these two, somewhat conflicting, policy perspectives, one would not be justified in achieving one end of policy concerns at the expense of another. I attempt to relate problems of enhancement of labor productivity to the cause of protecting the rights of individual workers, not as confliction, but as cooperation and integration.

Abstract

Present-day labor law, as a special law designed to protect employees' welfare, has a relatively short history. It came into existence only as a result of the modern industrial development and with it the rise of the status of employee(wage earner). The goals and objectives of labor legal studies have been the full realization of the workers economic and social rights, for which the specialty of labor law has been also stressed. The right to organization, particularly in Korea, has had dogmatic overtones, it seems to be dedicated to achieving enhanced legitimacy of labor union itself, rather than focusing on rectifying and supplementing contract theories based upon the simplistic version of market economy. The legal acknowledgement of labor union needs to be made through the coordination and rectification of the individual-oriented principle of "freedom of contract". I point out that it neglects to establish labor law as a mechanism, where labor and management can be interlinked to each other, by overstressed labor rights and the unfettered function of labor union, and disregarding the concerns of labor productivity and those of business competitiveness. Understanded the inseparable link between the enhancement of labor productivity and the improvement of working conditions, it is of great significance that every effort should be made to set up a paradigm of labor relations and labor law that can best accommodate the contemporary needs to have both labor and management work in collaboration with each other, as well as to eliminate repressive tones of unconstitutional labor law clauses. Although it may be difficult to meet these two, somewhat conflicting, policy perspectives, one would not be justified in achieving one end of policy concerns at the expense of another. I attempt to relate problems of enhancement of labor productivity to the cause of protecting the rights of individual workers, not as confliction, but as cooperation and integration.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 강희원, "노동법의 법체계적 지위", 노동법학 (1996)
  2. 강희원, "노동3권의 법적 성격과 노동단체법", 헌법실무연구회, 2000, ~[DOI]
  3. 강희원, "노동법" (1998), 동림사
  4. 김치선, "노동법총설" (1989), 서울대학교 출판부
  5. 김태기, "이제 다시 시작이다" (2007), 기파랑
  6. 김형배, "노동법" (2008), 박영사
  7. 김희성, "노동법의 유연화와 해고규제", 노동법학, (18), pp.1~30 (2004), 한국노동법학회
  8. 노준석, "한국노동교육원법 폐지계획을 철회하라", 노사공포럼, 12 (2008)
  9. 박수근, "파견근로제도의 개선과제와 파견법의 개폐방향", 노동법학, (19), pp.255~296 (2004), 한국노동법학회
  10. 방준식, "사용자 지시권의 내재적 한계와 제한의 결정원리", 노동법학, (24), pp.27~68 (2007), 한국노동법학회
  11. 오문완, "노동단체법의 쟁점과 과제" (2003), 울산대학교 출판부
  12. 윤광희, "현행 노동법체계하에서의 산별노조 법리", 산업관계연구, 13(1), pp.33~68 (2003), 한국노사관계학회
  13. 이병태, "최신 노동법" (2006), 중앙경제사
  14. 이상윤, "노동법" (2003), 법문사
  15. 이영희, "노동법" (2001), 법문사
  16. 이철수, "근로계약의 입법론적·해석론적 과제 ―이른바 근로계약법제와 관련하여―", 노동법학, (15) (2002), 한국노동법학회
  17. 이흥재, "노동법강의" (2002), 법문사
  18. 전유상, "경쟁시대와 기업의 혁신" (1994), 어문각
  19. 조성혜, "해고제한법 개정과 해고합의금청구권", 노동법학, (19), pp.189~220 (2004), 한국노동법학회
  20. 최종태, "한국노동교육원 20년 성과와 향후 역할", 노동교육, 63 (2008)
  21. 하갑래, "근로기준법" (2008), 중앙경제사
  22. 하경효, "주요국의 근로계약법제에 대한 논의 및 우리나라에의 적용방안 연구" (2006), 노동부
  23. 管野和夫, "雇用社會の法" (1997), 有斐閣
  24. 坂本宏志, "最低賃金制ㆍ賃金債權の確保", 賃金と勞働時間 (2000), 有斐閣
  25. 管野和夫, "勞働法" (2008), 弘文堂
  26. 森本 称之介, "勞働委員會制度の 課題", 勞働法學の 理論と 課題 (1999), 有斐閣
  27. 한국경영자총협회, "노사관계법ㆍ제도 선진화 방안에 대한 경영계 입장", ~ (2006)
  28. 한국경제연구원, "규제개혁 종합연구", ~ (2007)
  29. 노사관계제도 선진화위원회, "노사관계법ㆍ제도 선진화 방안", ~ (2003)
  30. 한국노동교육원, "국내노동교육의 실태연구", 한국노동교육원, ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)