Who are Dominant Communicators on Twitter? A Study of Korean Twitter Users
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explores how Twitter users perceive their socio-communication attitudes as well as those who users follow. From the theoretical perspective of communication styles in interpersonal communication, this study focuses on the positions and roles of users and their partners in Twitter conversations by conducting a survey and a content analysis. The results demonstrate that the respondents tended to perceive their communication attitudes to be more passive on Twitter than in the real world. In addition, they tended to perceive that their most trusted followees were more likely to show dominant communication attitudes than they did. These results indicate that ordinary users are more likely to play a role as listeners than as speakers on Twitter while entrusting several trusted users with the role of a dominant communicator and that their perception of their own and their followees’ communication styles tends to influence their actual behavior on Twitter.
Abstract
This study explores how Twitter users perceive their socio-communication attitudes as well as those who users follow. From the theoretical perspective of communication styles in interpersonal communication, this study focuses on the positions and roles of users and their partners in Twitter conversations by conducting a survey and a content analysis. The results demonstrate that the respondents tended to perceive their communication attitudes to be more passive on Twitter than in the real world. In addition, they tended to perceive that their most trusted followees were more likely to show dominant communication attitudes than they did. These results indicate that ordinary users are more likely to play a role as listeners than as speakers on Twitter while entrusting several trusted users with the role of a dominant communicator and that their perception of their own and their followees’ communication styles tends to influence their actual behavior on Twitter.
참고문헌 (52)
- C. L. Hsu, "Sociology of Hyperlink Networks of Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Twitter: A Case Study of South Korea", Social Science Computer Review, 29(3), pp.354~368 (2011)
- C. L. Hsu, "Identifying Influential Users on Twitter: A Case of Sejong City in South Korea", Presented at 5th Annual Conference of COREN (2010)
- B. J. Jansen, "Classifying Ecommerce Information Sharing Behavior by Youths on Social Networking Sites", Journal of Information Science, 37, pp.120~136 (2011)
- "Did tweeting topple Tunisia?" (2011)[URL]
- C. Honeycut, "Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter", Paper presented at the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42) (2009)
- G. Goggin, "Internationalizing Internet Studies: Beyond Anglophone Paradigms" (2008), Routledge
- M. S. Lee, "Exploring the Web Visibility of World-Class Universities", Scientometrics, 90(1), pp.201~218 (2012)
- Y-O, Lee, "The Reconfiguration of E-campaign Practices in Korea : A Case Study of the Presidential Primaries of 2007", International Sociology, 25, pp.29~53 (2010)
- H. W. Park, "Socio-Communicational Structure among Political Actors on the Web in South Korea : The Dynamics of Digital Presence in Cyberspace", New Media & Society, 6, pp.403~423 (2004)
- J. K. Kim, "Understanding of Digital Korean Society" (2006), Jipmondang
- "New Twitter Research: Men Follow Men and Nobody Tweets" (2009)[URL]
- 임연수, "10.28 재보궐 선거의 블로그 캠페인에 대한 웹계량화 분석", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 12(1), pp.539~551 (2010), 한국자료분석학회
- Y. C. Kim, "E-democracy: New Political Paradigm" (2005), Oh-Rm
- H. W. Park, "How 17th Members of the National Assembly Use Websites: Optimistic and Pessimistic Views of Digital Politics", Digital Communication Review, 3, pp.57~93 (2007)
- A. L. Hughes, "Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events", International Journal of Emergency Management, 6, pp.248~260 (2009)
- M. Naaman, "Is it Really about Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams", CSCW’10 Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (2010)
- W. J. Ng, "The Impact of Synchronicity and Civility in Online Political Discussions on Perceptions and Intentions to Participate", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (2005)
- M. J. Kim, "Measuring Twitter-Based Political Participation and Deliberation in the South Korean Context by Using Social Network and Triple Helix Indicators", Scientometrics, 90(1), pp.121~140 (2012)
- M. Castells, "Communication power" (2009), Oxford University Press
- L. M. Humphreys, "How Much is Too Much? Privacy Issues on Twitter", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Suntec Singapore International Convention & Exhibition Centre (2010)
- D. Boyd, "Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter", HICSS-43. IEEE: Kauai, HI, 6, pp.1~10 (2010)
- A. E. Marwick, "I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience", New Media & Society (online version), pp.1~20 (2010)
- J. Comm, "Twitter Power 2.0: How to Dominate Your Market One Tweet at a Time" (2010), Wiley
- A. Goffman, "The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life" (1959), Doubleday
- "Netizens Comment on MB’s thinking of Twitter Use" (2009)[URL]
- "Defeated by SNS, Noting Positive Participation of Mobile Generation in Election" (2011)[URL]
- "The Remarkable Growth of Korean Twitter Users for One Year" (2011)[URL]
- "Na Kyung Won was defeated in the outcome of retweets" (2011)[URL]
- 장용호, "마이크로블로그 채택모델에 관한 연구: 미디어채택 연구에 대한 통합적 접근", 한국언론학보, 54(5), pp.32~58 (2010), 한국언론학회
- 이수영, "마이크로 블로그 이용자의 능동성에 관한 탐색적 연구: 트위터와 미투데이 이용자의 생산적 활동을 중심으로", 방송통신연구, 73(73), pp.171~200 (2011), 한국방송학회
- "13% of Online Adults Use Twitter: Half of Twitter Users Access the Service on the Go via Mobile Phone" (2011)[URL]
- R. W. Norton, "Foundation of a Communicator Style Construct", Human Communication Resarch, 4, pp.99~112 (1978)
- A. P. Rovai, "The relationships of communicator style, personality-based learning style, and classroom community among online graduate students", Internet and Higher Education, 6, pp.347~363 (2003)
- R. E. Rice, "Communicator Style, Media Use, Organizational Level, and Use and Evaluation of Electronic Messaging", Management Communication Quarterly, 6, pp.3~33 (1992)
- 황유선, "트위터에서의 의견 지도력과 트위터 이용패턴: 이용동기, 트윗 이용패턴, 그리고 유형별 사례분석", 한국방송학보, 24(6), pp.365~404 (2010), 한국방송학회
- J. H. Kim, "A Hyperlink and Issue Network Analysis of the United States Senate : A Rediscovery of Web as a Relational and Topical Medium", Journal of American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61, pp.1598~1611 (2010)
- J. K. Burgoon, "The Nature and Measurement of Interpersonal Dominance", Communication Monographs, 65, pp.308~335 (1998)
- J. K. Burgoon, "An Interactionist Perspective on Dominance-Submission: Interpersonal Dominance as a Dynamic, Situationally Contingent Social Skill", Communication Monographs, 67, pp.96~121 (2000)
- M. Schimid-Mast, "Dominance as Expressed and Inferred through Speaking Time: A Meta-Analysis", Human Communication Research, 28, pp.420~450 (2002)
- S. Kiesler, "Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication", American Psychologist, 39, pp.1123~1134 (1984)
- J. B. Walther, "The Rules of Virtual Groups : Trust, Liking, and Performance in Computer-Mediated Communication", Journal of Communication, 55, pp.828~846 (2005)
- U. Matzat, "Disciplinary Differences in the Use of Internet Discussion Groups: Differential Communication Needs or Trust Problems?", Journal of Information Science, 35(5), pp.613~631 (2009)
- J. Peña, "Effects of Geographic Distribution on Dominance Perceptions in Computer-Mediated Groups", Communication Research, 34, pp.313~331 (2007)
- 고상민, "소셜네트워크서비스와 온라인 사회적 자본:한국과 중국 사례를 중심으로", 한국전자거래학회지, 15(1), pp.103~118 (2010), 한국전자거래학회
- B. Hogan, "The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media : Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online", Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, pp.377~386 (2010)
- J. B. Walther, "Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction", Communication Research, 23, pp.3~13 (1996)
- J. B. Walther, "Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships, In Handbook of interpersonal communication", pp.529~563 (2002), Sage
- G. H. Hofstede, "Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations" (2001), Sage Publications
- E. T. Hall, "Beyond Culture" (1976), Anchor Press
- Y. C. Hwang, "A Study on Trends of Social Network Services and Applications: A Review from 2000 to 2009", SpringerLink Presented 2011 e-CASE & e-Tech International Conference (2011)
- H. F. Kaiser, "The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis", Psychometrika, 23, pp.187~200
- L. J. Cronbach, "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests", Psychometrika, 16, pp.297~334 (1951)
