Content Analysis on Twitter for Identifying Scholarly Activities and Public Use in Informal Communication: With a Focus on Domestic Scholars in Social Sciences
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to identify and categorize the content and public use patterns of social scientists’ informal communication activities. Using Twitter data, we identified Korean 736 social scientists who participated in communication activities with the public, and analyzed 4,548 tweets that revealed their informal communication activities. This study is meaningful in that it explored informal communication between social scientists and the public, which was not previously revealed in scholarly communication, and identified the types of informal communication activities, communication media, and collaborative sectors in detail.
Abstract
This study aims to identify and categorize the content and public use patterns of social scientists’ informal communication activities. Using Twitter data, we identified Korean 736 social scientists who participated in communication activities with the public, and analyzed 4,548 tweets that revealed their informal communication activities. This study is meaningful in that it explored informal communication between social scientists and the public, which was not previously revealed in scholarly communication, and identified the types of informal communication activities, communication media, and collaborative sectors in detail.
참고문헌 (43)
- Peter Alegi, "Podcasting the past: Africa past and present and (South) African history in the digital age", South African Historical Journal, 64(2), pp.206~220 (2012), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Barker, D., "The scholarship of engagement : A taxonomy of five emerging practices", Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 9(2), pp.123~137 (2004)
- Bodmer, W., "The public understanding of science" (1985), The Royal Society
- Katy Börner, "Visualizing knowledge domains", Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), pp.179~255 (2003), Wiley[DOI]
- Massimiano Bucchi, "Big science, little news: science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946-1997", Public Understanding of Science, 12(1), pp.7~24 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Bucchi, M., "Handbook of public communication of science and technology" (2008), Routledge
- Cao, Z., "Science communication based on the Web 2.0: Give the songshuhui.net as an example", 2009 Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology, pp.473~476 (2009), IEEE
- Case, D. O., "Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior" (2016), Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Stuart Allan, "Science blogs as competing channels for the dissemination of science news", Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 12(7), pp.889~902 (2011), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Dearing, J. W., "Newspaper coverage of maverick science: Creating controversy through balancing", Public Understanding of Science, 4(4), pp.341~361 (2016)[DOI]
- Ana Delgado, "Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology", Public Understanding of Science, 20(6), pp.826~845 (2011), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Anthony Dudo, "Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement", PLOS ONE, 11(2), pp.e0148867~ (2016), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- English, R., "The ACRL scholarly communications initiative : A progress report", College & Research Libraries News, 65(8), pp.450~453 (2004)
- Sibele Fausto, "Research Blogging: Indexing and Registering the Change in Science 2.0", PLoS ONE, 7(12), pp.e50109~ (2012), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Feng Gu, "Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media", The Electronic Library, 29(6), pp.762~776 (2011), Emerald[DOI]
- Stefanie Haustein, "Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns", PLOS ONE, 10(3), pp.e0120495~ (2015), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Stefanie Haustein, "Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), pp.656~669 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
- Holsti, O. R., "Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities" (1969), Addison-Wesley Pub. Co
- Pablo Jensen, "Scientists who engage with society perform better academically", Science and Public Policy, 35(7), pp.527~541 (2008), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Ashley Rose Kelly, "Access, accommodation, and science: Knowledge in an “open” world", First Monday, 18(6) (2013), University of Illinois Libraries[DOI]
- Sara Kjellberg, "Researchers' use of social network sites: A scoping review", Library & Information Science Research, 38(3), pp.224~234 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 고희령, "신문 기사의 과학 개념 분석이 과학 교육에 주는 시사점", 교육문화연구, 17(2), pp.367~384 (2011), 교육연구소[DOI]
- S. Kyvik, "Popular science publishing", Scientometrics, 31(2), pp.143~153 (1994), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Svein Kyvik, "Popular Science Publishing and Contributions to Public Discourse among University Faculty", Science Communication, 26(3), pp.288~311 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Mi Kyung Lee, "Mapping a Twitter scholarly communication network: a case of the association of internet researchers’ conference", Scientometrics, 112(2), pp.767~797 (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- María José Luzón, "Public Communication of Science in Blogs", Written Communication, 30(4), pp.428~457 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Adrian Mackenzie, "From Validating to Verifying: Public Appeals in Synthetic Biology", Science as Culture, 22(4), pp.476~496 (2013), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Mahrt, M., "Twitter and society", pp.399~410 (2014), Peter Lang
- Gemma Nández, "Use of social networks for academic purposes: a case study", The Electronic Library, 31(6), pp.781~791 (2013), Emerald[DOI]
- Owen, R., "Responsible research and innovation : From science in society to science for society, with society", Science and Public Policy, 39(6), pp.751~760 (2012)[DOI]
- Ellen Poliakoff, "What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities?", Science Communication, 29(2), pp.242~263 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Pellechia, M. G., "Trends in science coverage : A content analysis of three US newspapers", Public Understanding of Science, 6(1), pp.49~68 (1997)[DOI]
- Pujari, S. C., "Social activity versus academic activity:A case study of computer scientists on Twitter", Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business, 12(1-12), pp.8~ (2015), ACM
- C. Ross, "Enabled backchannel: conference Twitter use by digital humanists", Journal of Documentation, 67(2), pp.214~237 (2011), Emerald[DOI]
- Eileen Scanlon, "Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement", British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), pp.12~23 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
- Mike S. Schäfer, "Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science", Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), pp.650~663 (2012), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Ahmed Maher khafaga Shehata, "The impact of information and communication technologies on informal scientific communication", Library Review, 64(6, pp.7) (2015), 428~445[DOI]
- Hadas Shema, "Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information", PLoS ONE, 7(5), pp.e35869~ (2012), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Jack Stilgoe, "Why should we promote public engagement with science?", Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), pp.4~15 (2014), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Cassidy R. Sugimoto, "Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination in TED videos", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), pp.663~674 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
- Einar Thorsen, "Blogging on the ice: Connecting audiences with climate-change sciences", International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 9(1), pp.87~101 (2013), Intellect[DOI]
- Gunver Lystbæk Vestergård, "From the preserves of the educated elite to virtually everywhere: A content analysis of Danish science news in 1999 and 2012", Public Understanding of Science, 26(2), pp.220~234 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Edward Zalta, "The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: A university", library partnership in support of scholarly communication and open access, 2006, pp.67(8), 502~504[DOI]
