본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Grafting Success Rate and Hearing Outcomes between Endoscopic and Retro-Aural Approach (Tympanoplasty Type I)

3

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives : The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of endoscopic tympanoplasty with those of the microscopic retro-aural approach. Materials and Methods : Data of patients who underwent tympanoplasty type I, performed by a single surgeon, at the Pusan National University Hospital between April 2011 and June 2019 were investigated retrospectively. The outcomes were analyzed in terms of the graft success rate, operating time, hospital stay duration, hearing gain with pure tone audiometry (PTA), and preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG). Results : Of the 388 ears, 199 (51%) underwent endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET), and 189 (49%) underwent microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) with a retro-aural approach. ET resulted in a graft success rate of 92.5%, whereas MT led to a graft success rate of 96.3% (p=0.158). The mean gain of ABG was 5.79±8.93 in the ET group and 6.90±8.11 in the MT group, respectively (p=0.423). The median surgical time was 54 min in the ET group and 94 min in the MT group. The operation time was shorter in the ET group than in the MT group (p<0.001). Further, the hospitalization period was also shorter in the ET group (3 days) than in the MT group (7 days) (p<0.001). Conclusions : ET is an alternative to MT as it has a comparable graft success rate and improved hearing. In addition, ET is cosmetic owing to no incision, with a shorter operation and hospital stay duration.

Abstract

Background and Objectives : The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of endoscopic tympanoplasty with those of the microscopic retro-aural approach. Materials and Methods : Data of patients who underwent tympanoplasty type I, performed by a single surgeon, at the Pusan National University Hospital between April 2011 and June 2019 were investigated retrospectively. The outcomes were analyzed in terms of the graft success rate, operating time, hospital stay duration, hearing gain with pure tone audiometry (PTA), and preoperative and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG). Results : Of the 388 ears, 199 (51%) underwent endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET), and 189 (49%) underwent microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) with a retro-aural approach. ET resulted in a graft success rate of 92.5%, whereas MT led to a graft success rate of 96.3% (p=0.158). The mean gain of ABG was 5.79±8.93 in the ET group and 6.90±8.11 in the MT group, respectively (p=0.423). The median surgical time was 54 min in the ET group and 94 min in the MT group. The operation time was shorter in the ET group than in the MT group (p<0.001). Further, the hospitalization period was also shorter in the ET group (3 days) than in the MT group (7 days) (p<0.001). Conclusions : ET is an alternative to MT as it has a comparable graft success rate and improved hearing. In addition, ET is cosmetic owing to no incision, with a shorter operation and hospital stay duration.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Wullstein H, "Theory and practice of tympanoplasty", Laryngoscope, 66(8), pp.1076~1093 (1956)
  2. Zollner F, "The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus", J Laryngol Otol, 69(10), pp.637~652 (1955)
  3. Jumaily M, "Butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty outcomes : a single-institution experience and literature review", Am J Otolaryngol, 39(4), pp.396~400 (2018)
  4. Mundra RK, "Tympanoplasty in subtotal perforation with graft supported by a slice of cartilage : a study with near 100 % results", Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 65(Suppl 3), pp.631~635 (2013)
  5. Rizer FM, "Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part II : the study", Laryngoscope, 107(12 Pt 2), pp.26~36 (1997)
  6. Jalali MM, "Comparison of cartilage with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty : a meta-analysis of comparative studies", Laryngoscope, 127(9), pp.2139~2148 (2017)
  7. Kim MB, "Comparison of clinical outcomes between butterfly inlay cartilage tympanoplasty and conventional underlay cartilage tympanoplasty", Auris Nasus Larynx, 46(2), pp.167~171 (2019)
  8. Mer SB, "Fiberoptic endotoscopes for examining the middle ear", Arch Otolaryngol, 85(4), pp.387~393 (1967)
  9. Ozdemir D, "Outcomes of endoscopic transcanal type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 276(12), pp.3295~3299 (2019)
  10. Preyer S, "Endoscopic ear surgery-a complement to microscopic ear surgery", HNO, 65(Suppl 1), pp.29~34 (2017)
  11. Bayram A, "How do you perform your tympanoplasty, endoscopically or microscopically?", ENT Updates, 9(2), pp.144~149 (2019)
  12. 최나연, "Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 10(1), pp.44~49 (2017), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  13. Dundar R, "Endoscopic versus microscopic approach to type 1 tympanoplasty in children", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 78(7), pp.1084~1089 (2014)
  14. Hsu YC, "A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty", J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 47(1), pp.44~ (2018)
  15. Hunter JB, "Endoscopic techniques in tympanoplasty and stapes surgery", Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 24(5), pp.388~394 (2016)
  16. Babu S, "Over-under versus medial tympanoplasty : Comparison of benefit, success, and hearing results", Laryngoscope, 129(5), pp.1206~1210 (2019)
  17. Akyigit A, "Endoscopic cartilage butterfly myringoplasty in children", Auris Nasus Larynx, 44(2), pp.152~155 (2017)
  18. Eren SB, "Endoscopic transcanal inlay myringoplasty : alternative approach for anterior perforations", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 153(5), pp.891~893 (2015)
  19. Manna S, "Endoscopic versus microscopic middle ear surgery : a meta-analysis of outcomes following tympanoplasty and stapes surgery", Otol Neurotol, 40(8), pp.983~993 (2019)
  20. Tarabichi M, "Endoscopic middle ear surgery", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 108(1), pp.39~46 (1999)
  21. Tseng CC, "Comparison of the efficacy of endoscopic tympanoplasty and microscopic tympanoplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Laryngoscope, 127(8), pp.1890~1896 (2017)
  22. Ghaffar S, "Incorporating the endoscope into middle ear surgery", Ear Nose Throat J, 85(9), pp.593~596 (2006)
  23. Nassif N, "Tympanic membrane perforation in children: Endoscopic type I tympanoplasty, a newly technique, is it worthwhile?", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 79(11), pp.1860~1864 (2015)
  24. 이상연, "Can Endoscopic Tympanoplasty Be a Good Alternative to Microscopic Tympanoplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 12(2), pp.145~155 (2019), 대한이비인후과학회

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty노양섭, 문일준, 박우리, 욱선현, 이정주, 정원호, 조양선, 최나연, 최지은, 홍성화대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2017 · 제10권 제1호Can Endoscopic Tympanoplasty Be a Good Alternative to Microscopic Tympanoplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis김영호, 서유주, 이도영, 이상연대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2019 · 제12권 제2호Outcomes of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty for Large Perforations: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in South Korea강우석, 공수근, 문인석, 문일준, 이일우, 이종대, 정종우, 조형호, 최성원, 최지은, 허동구대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2023 · 제16권 제2호고막외이도피판 거상 없이 시행하는 내시경적 밀어넣기 연골막 고막성형술의 효과에 대한 연구박의현, 이태훈, 임기정, 장지원, 최수정대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2025 · 제68권 제11호Microscopic versus Endoscopic Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty강현택, 김보경, 이세아, 이윤지, 이종대대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2019 · 제23권 제3호Transcanal Endoscopic Tympanoplasty for Pediatric Patients Under 15 Years of Age With Chronic Otitis Media이성수, 조형호대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2020 · 제13권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)