Residents’ Expectation of Family Medicine- Specific Training Program and Its Current State
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The family medicine residency program consists mainly of clinical rotations in other specialties and the family medicine-specifi c training. We conducted this study to investigate how family medicine residents evaluated their training program that include family-oriented medicine, clinical preventive medicine, behavioral science and research in primary care. Methods: In 2009, third-year residents of 129 training hospitals in Korea were surveyed to investigate the current state and their expectation of the residency program. The contents of questionnaires included training periods, conferences,procedures, interview techniques, outpatient and inpatient consultations, and written thesis. Results: Total 133 out of 142 residents (93.7%) responded that 3 years of training is ideal or pertinent. Residents responded that the types of conference that they need most are journal review (81%), staff lecture (73.2%), and clinical topic review (73.2%), in that order. Procedures and interview techniques that the residents want to learn most were gastroscopy (72.5%), abdominal ultrasonography (65.2%), and pain management (46.4%). Hospitals where family medicine residents do not see hospitalized patients or patients in the outpatient clinic were 7.9% and 6.5%, respectively, whereas hospitals that maintain continuous family medicine outpatient clinics were only 40.8%. Education in outpatient clinic and articlewriting seminars was done less frequently in the secondary hospitals than in the tertiary hospitals. Conclusion: Evaluation and quality improvement of family medicine training program as well as specialty rotations should be considered in order to foster better family physicians. The efforts have to be made to minimize the difference in quality of each family medicine residency program.
Abstract
Background: The family medicine residency program consists mainly of clinical rotations in other specialties and the family medicine-specifi c training. We conducted this study to investigate how family medicine residents evaluated their training program that include family-oriented medicine, clinical preventive medicine, behavioral science and research in primary care. Methods: In 2009, third-year residents of 129 training hospitals in Korea were surveyed to investigate the current state and their expectation of the residency program. The contents of questionnaires included training periods, conferences,procedures, interview techniques, outpatient and inpatient consultations, and written thesis. Results: Total 133 out of 142 residents (93.7%) responded that 3 years of training is ideal or pertinent. Residents responded that the types of conference that they need most are journal review (81%), staff lecture (73.2%), and clinical topic review (73.2%), in that order. Procedures and interview techniques that the residents want to learn most were gastroscopy (72.5%), abdominal ultrasonography (65.2%), and pain management (46.4%). Hospitals where family medicine residents do not see hospitalized patients or patients in the outpatient clinic were 7.9% and 6.5%, respectively, whereas hospitals that maintain continuous family medicine outpatient clinics were only 40.8%. Education in outpatient clinic and articlewriting seminars was done less frequently in the secondary hospitals than in the tertiary hospitals. Conclusion: Evaluation and quality improvement of family medicine training program as well as specialty rotations should be considered in order to foster better family physicians. The efforts have to be made to minimize the difference in quality of each family medicine residency program.
참고문헌 (8)
- Goh LG, "Challenges in family medicine", Singapore Med J, 40, pp.723~725 (1999)
- Medical Education in Training Institute, "Family medicine. Vol. 3" (2006), Seoul National University Press
- Duane M, "Follow-up on family practice residents' perspectives on length and content of training", J Am Board Fam Pract, 17, pp.377~383 (2004)
- 김민정, "가정의학과 전공의의 파견 수련 평가 실태", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 28(8), pp.616~625 (2007), 대한가정의학회
- 이성희, "전국 가정의학 전공의 수련프로그램의 연구 및 학술활동 분석", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 25(11), pp.826~834 (2004), 대한가정의학회
- Lee JK, "Training of family medicine residency pointed of educational professor", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 23(4), pp.S390~S392 (2002)
- Lee SH, "New paradigm of residency programs and goal of training of family medicine", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 23(11), pp.S136~S146 (2002)
- 백유진, "전국 가정의학 전공의 프로그램 중 수련이 어려운 과목", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 28(5), pp.367~374 (2007), 대한가정의학회
