Defining Essential Topics and Procedures for Korean Family Medicine Residency Training
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: This study aims to create a comprehensive list of essential topics and procedural skills for family medicine residency training in Korea.Methods: Three e-mailed surveys were conducted. The first and second surveys were sent to all board-certified family physicians in the Korean Academy of Family Medicine (KAFM) database via e-mail. Participants were asked to rate each of the topics (117 in survey 1, 36 in survey 2) and procedures (65 in survey 1, 19 in survey 2) based on how necessary it was to teach it and personal experience of utilizing it in clinical practice. Agreement rates of the re-sponses were calculated and then sent to the 32 KAFM board members in survey 3. Opinions on potential cut-off points to divide the items into three categories and the minimum achievement requirements needed to graduate for each category were solicited.Results: Of 6,588 physicians, 256 responded to the first survey (3.89% response rate), 209 out of 6,669 to the second survey (3.13%), and 100% responded to the third survey. The final list included 153 topics and 81 procedures, which were organized into three categories: mandatory, recommended, and optional (112/38/3, 27/33/21). For each cat-egory of topics and procedures, the minimum requirement for 3-year residency training was set at 90%/60%/30% and 80%/60%/30%, respectively.Conclusion: This national survey was the first investigation to define essential topics and procedures for residency training in Korean family medicine. The lists obtained represent the opinions of Korean family physicians and are expected to aid in the improvement of family medicine training programs in the new competency-based curricu-lum.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to create a comprehensive list of essential topics and procedural skills for family medicine residency training in Korea.Methods: Three e-mailed surveys were conducted. The first and second surveys were sent to all board-certified family physicians in the Korean Academy of Family Medicine (KAFM) database via e-mail. Participants were asked to rate each of the topics (117 in survey 1, 36 in survey 2) and procedures (65 in survey 1, 19 in survey 2) based on how necessary it was to teach it and personal experience of utilizing it in clinical practice. Agreement rates of the re-sponses were calculated and then sent to the 32 KAFM board members in survey 3. Opinions on potential cut-off points to divide the items into three categories and the minimum achievement requirements needed to graduate for each category were solicited.Results: Of 6,588 physicians, 256 responded to the first survey (3.89% response rate), 209 out of 6,669 to the second survey (3.13%), and 100% responded to the third survey. The final list included 153 topics and 81 procedures, which were organized into three categories: mandatory, recommended, and optional (112/38/3, 27/33/21). For each cat-egory of topics and procedures, the minimum requirement for 3-year residency training was set at 90%/60%/30% and 80%/60%/30%, respectively.Conclusion: This national survey was the first investigation to define essential topics and procedures for residency training in Korean family medicine. The lists obtained represent the opinions of Korean family physicians and are expected to aid in the improvement of family medicine training programs in the new competency-based curricu-lum.
참고문헌 (13)
- Allen T, "Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine: dimensions of competence and priority topics for assess ment", Can Fam Physician, 57, pp.e331~e340 (2011)
- Baglia J, "Generating de velopmentally appropriate competency assessment at a family medi cine residency", Fam Med, 43, pp.90~98 (2011)
- Tandeter H, "A ‘minimal core curriculum’ for family medicine in undergraduate medical education : a European Delphi survey among EURACT repre sentatives", Eur J Gen Pract, 17, pp.217~220 (2011)
- Shaughnessy AF, "Entrustable professional activities in family medicine", J Grad Med Educ, 5, pp.112~118 (2013)
- Schultz K, "The application of entrustable profes sional activities to inform competency decisions in a family medicine residency program", Acad Med, 90, pp.888~897 (2015)
- Michels NRM, "Educational training requirements for general practice", family medicine specialty training: recommendations for trainees, trainers and training institu tions, 2018, pp.29, 322~326
- Wetmore SJ, "Defining core procedure skills for Canadian family medicine training", Can Fam Physician, 51, pp.1364~1365 (2005)
- Tenore JL, "A national survey of procedural skill requirements in family practice residency programs", Fam Med, 33, pp.28~38 (2001)
- Nothnagle M, "Required procedural training in family medicine residency : a consen sus statement", Fam Med, 40, pp.248~252 (2008)
- Kelly BF, "Advanced pro cedural training in family medicine : a group consensus statement", Fam Med, 41, pp.398~404 (2009)
- Riley B, "The condensed curriculum guide : for GP training and the new MRCGP" (2007), Royal College of General Prac titioners
- Smith MA, "The future of procedural training in family practice residency programs : look before you LEEP", Fam Med, 27, pp.535~538 (1995)
- Wickstrom GC, "Confidence of academic general internists and family physicians to teach ambulatory procedures", J Gen Intern Med, 15, pp.353~360 (2000)