사회적 책임의식 함양을 위한 ENACT 모형 기반 기초설계 교과목의 비대면 수업 운영 사례
A Case Study of an ENACT Model-based Engineering Design Online Course for Fostering Social Responsibility of Engineers
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to introduce a case study of a basic engineering design course using the ENACT model for fostering social responsibility of engineers, and to investigate the educational effects of the course. Since the ENACT model was designed to encourage STEM college students to pursue responsible problem solving based on their understanding of socioscientific issues, we assumed that it would be beneficial for engineering students to foster their social responsibility as well as their understanding of science/engineering-related issues. A total of 49 engineering students who enrolled in the course participated in the study. Data included students’ course artifacts, reflection papers, and responses to survey questionnaires. Results indicated that the students became more aware of nature of science and technology after the program, and began to solve the problems while considering the views of multiple stakeholders. They highly valued the experience of communicating with others as engaging in the civic activities. They also expressed high satisfaction and feeling of achievement on the course learning. We expect the ENACT model to be an effective teaching guideline that fosters the social responsibility of engineering students and furthermore, engineering ethics.
Abstract
This study aimed to introduce a case study of a basic engineering design course using the ENACT model for fostering social responsibility of engineers, and to investigate the educational effects of the course. Since the ENACT model was designed to encourage STEM college students to pursue responsible problem solving based on their understanding of socioscientific issues, we assumed that it would be beneficial for engineering students to foster their social responsibility as well as their understanding of science/engineering-related issues. A total of 49 engineering students who enrolled in the course participated in the study. Data included students’ course artifacts, reflection papers, and responses to survey questionnaires. Results indicated that the students became more aware of nature of science and technology after the program, and began to solve the problems while considering the views of multiple stakeholders. They highly valued the experience of communicating with others as engaging in the civic activities. They also expressed high satisfaction and feeling of achievement on the course learning. We expect the ENACT model to be an effective teaching guideline that fosters the social responsibility of engineering students and furthermore, engineering ethics.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김가형, "지역사회연계 미세먼지 교육프로그램이 중학생들의 이슈에 대한 이해와 시민으로서의 인성과 가치관 함양에 미치는 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(6), pp.911~920 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 김가형, "블록체인을 활용한 적정기술에 대한 청소년 과학캠프 참여를 통한 이공계 대학(원)생과 과학기술자의 교육경험 탐색", 교과교육학연구, 23(3), pp.251~263 (2019), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
- 김태훈, "전문가 인식 조사에 의한 공학 설계 능력의 정의 및 하위 영역과 요소 도출", 공학교육연구, 18(3), pp.24~32 (2015), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 김태훈, "공학설계능력의 평가 요소 구명", 공학교육연구, 8(3), pp.49~56 (2005)
- 박기문, "공과대학생들의 학습성과(PO)에 대한 교육요구도 사례 연구", 공학교육연구, 14(3), pp.38~44 (2011), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 박수정, "온라인 수업에서 팀 학습 어떻게 할까" (2021), 학지사
- 설경란, "대학생 자원봉사자들의 자원봉사활동 향후 지속성 예측에 관한 연구 : 서울·경인지역 장애인복지관 대상자를 중심으로", 석사, 사회복지학, pp.2002
- 안윤정, "4차 산업혁명에 대한 대학생 인식과 진로교육의 방향모색", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(18), pp.329~351 (2017), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- 유양석, "4차 산업혁명의 사회적 문제에 대한 대학생의 인식과 준비 여부", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 19(3), pp.566~575 (2019), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 이정은, "공학역량에 대한 산업체의 요구분석", 공학교육연구, 22(3), pp.3~10 (2019), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 이현옥, "공과대학 학생을 위한 과학기술관련 사회·윤리 쟁점기반 수업이인성과 가치관에 미치는 효과 탐색", 공학교육연구, 23(3), pp.3~12 (2020), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 이현주, "이공계 대학생의 사회적 책임감 함양을 위한 ENACT 모형의 개발과 교육적 함의", 공학교육연구, 23(6), pp.3~16 (2020), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 진성희, "공학설계와 지역사회봉사활동을 통합한 서비스러닝 교육프로그램 운영 사례 및 효과", 공학교육연구, 21(4), pp.35~45 (2018), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 최현수, "대학생 자원봉사활동 지속 결정 요인에 관한 연구 : 공주지역 대학생을 중심으로", 석사, 사회복지학, pp.2007
- 한경희, "공학교육과 과학기술학(STS)의 학제적 협력 방안 탐색", 공학교육연구, 17(2), pp.50~58 (2014), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 한경희, "리빙랩 기반 공학설계교육의 경험과 평가 : 학생들은 언제, 어떻게 배우는가?", 공학교육연구, 21(4), pp.10~19 (2018), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 한경희, "공학 윤리 교육: 현황과 쟁점, 그리고 전략", 공학교육연구, 12(1), pp.31~41 (2009), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 허지숙, "공학 융합역량에 대한 산업체와 대학생의 인식 비교분석", 공학교육연구, 23(4), pp.3~13 (2020), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 홍연숙, "대학생의 자원봉사활동 지속 결정요인에 관한 연구", 석사, 사회복지, pp.2001
- 황영미, "기후변화 영화를 활용한 융합교육 모형연구: 다큐멘터리 <불편한 진실>을 중심으로", 공학교육연구, 19(5), pp.57~64 (2016), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- Bielefeldt, A. R., "Social responsibility (", pp.41~60 (2018), IntechOpen
- Canney, N. E., "Changes in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students over time", Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), pp.1535~1551 (2016)
- Christensen, C., "Risk and school science education", Studies in Science Education, 45(2), pp.205~223 (2009)
- Corley, E. A., "Scientists’ethical obligations and social responsibility for nanotechnology research", Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), pp.111~132 (2016)
- Glenn, J. C., "Futurizing teaching vs futures course", Social Science Record, 9(3), pp.26~29 (1972)
- Hughes, T. P., "The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology", pp.45~74 (2012), MIT Press
- Mehalik M. M., "What constitutes good design? A review of empirical studies of design processes", International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), pp.519~532 (2006)
- Mejlgaard, N., "Teaching responsible research and innovation : A phronetic perspective", Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), pp.597~615 (2019)
- Sjostrom, J., "Humanizing chemistry education : From simple contextualization to multifaceted problematization", Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), pp.1125~1131 (2014)
- Volti, R., "Society and technological change" (2009), Worth Publishers
- Waight, N., "Nature of technology : Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms", International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), pp.2875~2905 (2012)
- Wyndham, J. M., "Social responsibility : A preliminary inquiry into the perspectives of scientists, engineers and health professionals" (2015), American Association for the Advancement of Science
