본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Model Analysis of IFRS Glocalization

이노우에 사다코
한국국제회계학회 (Korea International Accounting Association)|2020.02|국제회계연구 (Korea International Accounting Review)|제89호|pp. 209-229|DOI 10.21073/kiar.2020..89.011

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

세계화GlobalizationGlocalizationIFRS글로벌화International Sociology국제사회학

초록

Currently, nearly 160 jurisdictions apply the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), including voluntary applications. However, the phenomenon of diverging from IFRS, namely, the return to local standards, is observed in both the European Union (EU) and the United States (U.S.). That is, accounting standards' globalization is progressing in a way where global and local standards blend. How can these dual phenomena related to IFRS application be interpreted, and how will the globalization of accounting standards evolve in the future? Such a question is similar to the debate over the concept of globalization in international sociology. This study attempts to comprehensively interpret the dual conflicting phenomena associated with the application of IFRS by taking advantage of the globalization discussion in international sociology. Firstly, this study discusses R. Robertson, G. Ritzer, and V. Roudometof, who theoretically deal with the concepts of globalization and glocalization; then, we derive an analytical model based on the discussed theories. Next, the EU and the U.S. are analyzed as examples of these dual conflicting phenomena. The EU has assumed glocalization standards since its inception, though its interest has been gradually shifting to local standards/practices. EU countries will partially adopt IFRS but will continue to maintain local practices. Therefore, their accounting standards will become increasingly heterogeneous. On the other hand, because the U.S. does not make clear the relationship between U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and IFRS, the results vary. When the relationship is mutually exclusive, and the U.S. GAAP improvement is valued, a so－called localization of accounting standards will occur. Conversely, if promoting the introduction of IFRS is emphasized, the U.S. GAAP will disappear. When the relationship is mutual penetration, the result will be similar to that in the EU case. If the priority of U.S. GAAP improvement increases, U.S. accounting standards will move to heterogeneity－oriented glocalization. If enhancing convergence to IFRS is a top priority, then homogenization－oriented glocalization will follow. In the future, the glocalization of accounting standards will diversify. This study will help to develop the globalization of accounting standards in the future and to consider the role that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) should play in the future.

Abstract

Currently, nearly 160 jurisdictions apply the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), including voluntary applications. However, the phenomenon of diverging from IFRS, namely, the return to local standards, is observed in both the European Union (EU) and the United States (U.S.). That is, accounting standards' globalization is progressing in a way where global and local standards blend. How can these dual phenomena related to IFRS application be interpreted, and how will the globalization of accounting standards evolve in the future? Such a question is similar to the debate over the concept of globalization in international sociology. This study attempts to comprehensively interpret the dual conflicting phenomena associated with the application of IFRS by taking advantage of the globalization discussion in international sociology. Firstly, this study discusses R. Robertson, G. Ritzer, and V. Roudometof, who theoretically deal with the concepts of globalization and glocalization; then, we derive an analytical model based on the discussed theories. Next, the EU and the U.S. are analyzed as examples of these dual conflicting phenomena. The EU has assumed glocalization standards since its inception, though its interest has been gradually shifting to local standards/practices. EU countries will partially adopt IFRS but will continue to maintain local practices. Therefore, their accounting standards will become increasingly heterogeneous. On the other hand, because the U.S. does not make clear the relationship between U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and IFRS, the results vary. When the relationship is mutually exclusive, and the U.S. GAAP improvement is valued, a so－called localization of accounting standards will occur. Conversely, if promoting the introduction of IFRS is emphasized, the U.S. GAAP will disappear. When the relationship is mutual penetration, the result will be similar to that in the EU case. If the priority of U.S. GAAP improvement increases, U.S. accounting standards will move to heterogeneity－oriented glocalization. If enhancing convergence to IFRS is a top priority, then homogenization－oriented glocalization will follow. In the future, the glocalization of accounting standards will diversify. This study will help to develop the globalization of accounting standards in the future and to consider the role that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) should play in the future.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. "EU 1999. Communication from the Commission of 11.05.1999, Implementing the Framework for Financial Markets: Action plan", COM, 1~29 (1999)
  2. "EU 2000. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, EU Financial Reporting Strategy: the way forward", COM, 1~12 (2000)
  3. "EU 2002. Regulation (EC) No 1606", 2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards, 2002, pp.1~4
  4. "EU 2008a. European Parliament Report on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the Governance of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (2006", 2248 (INI)) of 5. 2. 2008, 2008, pp.1~23
  5. "EU 2008b. Regulation (EC) No.297", 2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No.1606, OJL 97, pp.2008 (2002), 62~63
  6. "EU 2013. Mission to reinforce the EU’s contribution to the development of international accounting standards, Should IFRS standards be more “European”?", the report by Philippe Maystadt, 1~35 (2013)
  7. "EU 2016. The Basis of the Endorsement Procedure for IFRS Accounting Standards", Economic and monetary affairs, European Parliament, 1~8 (2016)
  8. "European Union (EU) 1995. Communication from the Commission of 14. 11. 1995. Accounting Harmonization: A New Strategy vis－a－vis International Harmonization", COM, 1~14 (1995)
  9. "Financial Accounting Foundation, Financial Accounting Standards Board, and Governmental Accounting Standards Board 2015", Strategic Plan, April, FAF, FASB, and GASB, ~ (2015)
  10. "Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) 2002. Memorandum of Understanding －“The Norwalk Agreement", ~ (2002)
  11. Hosoya, Ryuhei, "Glocalization as Globalization: Towards a Meme based theory of cyclical evolution", Journal of Glocal Studies (Center for Glocal Studies, Seijo University), 4, pp.1~21 (2017)
  12. "IFRS Foundation 2018. Use of IFRS Standards around the world, IFRS Foundation", ~ (2018)
  13. Inami, Toru, "The legal basis on the application of international accounting standards in the EU", Kaikei, 174(4), pp.36~48 (2008)
  14. Inami, Toru, "The adoption of IFRS in the EU in accordance with the concept of “Kapitalmarktorientierung”", Doshisha Shogaku (The Doshisha Business Review), 66(5), pp.321~332 (2015)
  15. Inoue, Sadako, "An International Sociological Study on the Diversity of the IFRS introduction", Sangyo Keiri, 78(3), pp.62~73 (2018)
  16. "International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation 2010. IFRS Foundation Constitution", IFRS Foundation, ~ (2010)
  17. Ono, Yukio, "The new work plan of the IASB and issues for the accounting profession in Japan", Bulletin of Japanese Association for International Accounting Studies, 2017(1․2), pp.11~21 (2018)
  18. Radhakrishnan, Smitha, "Routledge International Handbook of Globalization Studies", pp.23~41 (2010), Routledge
  19. Ritzer, George, "The Globalization of Nothing" (2004), Pine Forge Press, An Imprint of Sage Publications
  20. Robertson, Roland, "Bring Modernization Back In", Contemporary Sociology, 17(6), pp.752~754 (1988)
  21. Robertson, Roland, "Globalization: Social Theory And Global Culture" (1992), Sage Publication
  22. Robertson, Roland, "Global Modernities", pp.25~44 (1995), Sage Publications
  23. Robertson, Roland, "Handbook of Social Theory", pp.458~471 (2001), Sage Publications
  24. Robertson, Roland, "Encyclopedia Global Modernities", pp.402~410 (2007), Routledge
  25. Roudometof, Victor, "Glocalization: A Critical Introduction" (2016), Routledge
  26. Schnurr, Jame, , Remarks before the 2014 AICPA National Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments (2014)
  27. Schnurr, James, , Remarks at the 34th Annual SEC and Financial Reporting Institute Conference (2015)
  28. "SEC 2008b. Release Nos. 338982; 3458960; File No. S72708, Roadmap for the Potential Use of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance With International Financial Reporting Standards by U.S. Issuers", Federal Register, ~ (2008)
  29. "SEC 2010. SEC Progress Report, Work Plan for the Consideration of Incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the Financial Reporting System for U.S. Issuers", ~ (2010)
  30. "SEC 2011. SEC Staff Paper, Work Plan for the Consideration of Incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the Financial Reporting System for U.S. Issuers", ~ (2011)
  31. "SEC 2012. SEC Final Staff Report, Work Plan for the Consideration of Incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the Financial Reporting System for U.S. Issuers", ~ (2012)
  32. "Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 2008a. Release Nos. 338879; 3457026; International Series Release No. 1306; File No. S71307, Acceptance from Foreign Private Issuers of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance With International Financial Reporting Standards Without Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP; Final Rule", Federal Register, ~ (2008)
  33. Sugimoto, Tokuei, "SEC Office of the Chief Accountant and IFRS Initiative SEC political appointment and the commissioner IFRS application problems", Journal of business administration Kwansei Gakuin University, 63(3), pp.213~232 (2016)
  34. Sugimoto, Tokuei, "The Reality of International Accounting: Global Convergence of Accounting Standards and IFRS’s Adoption" (2017), Dobunkan
  35. Sugimoto, Tokuei, "Presidential Appointments of the SEC Commissioners and Incorporation IFRS into the Financial Reporting System for U.S. Issuers", Journal of business administration Kwansei Gakuin University, 66(3), pp.213~232 (2019)
  36. Sara Tulloch, "The Oxford Dictionary of New Words 1991" (1991), Oxford University Press
  37. Uesugi, Tomiyuki, "Toward the Construction of “Glocal Research”: Retargeting of Resonating Globalization and Localization", Nihon Jyomin Bunka Kiyo (Seijo University), 27, pp.43~75 (2009)
  38. Uesugi, Tomiyuki, "Notes on the Issues and Prospects of “Glocal Studies”: Focus on Local People and Things and Actions", Nihon Jyomin Bunka Kiyo (Seijo University),, 33, pp.1~27 (2018)
  39. Vizureanu, Viorel, "Some Remarks Concerning the Concept of Glocalization", Public Reason, 5(1), pp.69~86 (2013)
  40. White, M. J, "Public Statement: A U.S. Imperative: High－Quality", Globally Accepted Accounting Standards, ~ (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

A Study on the International Conflict Resolution Approach with Respect to International Financial Reporting Standards이찬민분쟁해결연구센터 · 분쟁해결연구2010 · 제8권 제3호회계보고의 국제적 수렴화가 회계의 질 향상에 미치는 영향윤소라한국국제회계학회 · 국제회계연구2011 · 제37호The Relative Value Relevance of U.S. GAAP and IFRSKriengkai Boonlert‐U‐Thai, Orapin Duangploy사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review2015 · 제20권 제1호HARMONIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF JAPANESE FIRMSII-Woon Kim, Sung-Hyoo Huh, Wikil Kwak사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review1999 · 제4권 제2호Global Convergence of Financial Standards박인섭서울시립대학교 법학연구소 · 서울법학2011 · 제19권 제2호UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND U.S. GAAPWingW. Poon사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review2001 · 제6권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

기업의 사회적 책임 활동이 경영자 보상에 미치는 영향황성준, 류수전pp. 1-21금융소득의 범위조정을 통한 이원적 소득과세의 도입 방안에 대한 연구정유석pp. 23-44경영전략과 시장경쟁이 원가행태의 비대칭성에 미치는 영향김연용pp. 45-64Effect of Co－Opted Board on Audit Fees이준엽, 이은서, 김채현pp. 65-86코넥스 신규상장기업의 상장가 할인과 감사인 특성최유원, 이민우, 문상혁pp. 87-111
원문 보기