Value and Trust in the Public Participation from the Case of Watershed Planning in US
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to introduce a model incorporating the techniques and processes with various values and trust for the public participation from the lessons of watershed planning in US. This paper carefully addresses the importance of appreciating social or group value, respecting diverse individual values, building trust and shared goal to ensure better public participation in a watershed planning process in US. Result shows the model for value and trust - a combined use of five techniques and six steps. Five techniques are consensus conference, citizen jury, scenario workshop, regulatory rule making, deliberative poll. Six steps are 1) analyze public contribution for underlying values issues, 2) identify clusters of publics, 3) write descriptions of the values for each cluster, 4) develop an alternative for each values cluster, 5) identify implications of each alternative, 6) evaluate the alternative. The use of the suggested model for value and trust to the public participation process will be a very useful approach in a practical sense, particularly, for water management plans in Korea. In addition, it will be desirable to specify how to practice public participation in a practical way by addressing the proper techniques and steps in water management plans.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to introduce a model incorporating the techniques and processes with various values and trust for the public participation from the lessons of watershed planning in US. This paper carefully addresses the importance of appreciating social or group value, respecting diverse individual values, building trust and shared goal to ensure better public participation in a watershed planning process in US. Result shows the model for value and trust - a combined use of five techniques and six steps. Five techniques are consensus conference, citizen jury, scenario workshop, regulatory rule making, deliberative poll. Six steps are 1) analyze public contribution for underlying values issues, 2) identify clusters of publics, 3) write descriptions of the values for each cluster, 4) develop an alternative for each values cluster, 5) identify implications of each alternative, 6) evaluate the alternative. The use of the suggested model for value and trust to the public participation process will be a very useful approach in a practical sense, particularly, for water management plans in Korea. In addition, it will be desirable to specify how to practice public participation in a practical way by addressing the proper techniques and steps in water management plans.
참고문헌 (23)
- Arrow,K.J., "Values and Collective Decision-Making" (1979), Published by Oxford University Press
- Blauert,J., "Spaces for Deliberation or Decision-making?: Lessons for Participation and Policy in Mexican Environmental Councils", The International Conference of the IASCP, Oaxaca (2004)
- Capra,F., "A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems; The Web of Life" (1996), An Anchor Book
- Chess, C., "Adaptive Participation in Watershed Management", Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 통권 : 3 (2000)
- Cortner, H.J., "Trends and Issues in Land and Water Resources Management - Setting the Agenda for Change", Environmental Management, 18(2) (1994)
- Creighton,J.L., "Executive Seminar in Water resources Planning", Executive Seminar in Water resources Planning (1976), US Army Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Virginia
- Forester,J., "Rationality, Emotional Sensitivity, and Moral Vision in Daily Planning Practice, The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes" (1999), MIT Press
- Friedmann,J., "Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action" (1987), Princeton University Press
- Griffin,C.B., "Watershed Councils: An Emerging Form of Public Participation in Natural Resource Management", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35(3) (1999)
- Habermas,J., "Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State, Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition" (1993), Princeton University Press
- Harper, T.L., "Out of the Postmodern Abyss: Preserving the Rationale for Liberal Planning", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 통권 : 14 (1995)
- "Building Trust within Community-Based Collaborative"[URL]
- Lukes,S., "The Curious Enlightenment of Professor Caritat" (1995), Verso
- Odum,E.P., "Ecology; A Bridge Between Science and Society" (1997), Sinauer Associates
- Renn, O., "Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse" (1995), Kluwer Academic Press
- Sager,T., "Deliberative Planning and Decision Making: An Impossibility Result", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 통권 : 21 (2002)
- Sen,A., "The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal", pp.128~133 (1979), Oxford University Press
- Sullivan, J., "Political Tolerance and American Democracy" (1982), Chicago Press
- Taylor,C., "The Politics of Recognition, Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition" (1993), Princeton University Press
- Webler, T., "Public Participation in Watershed Management Planning: Views on Process from People in the Field", Human Ecology Review, 9(1) (2002)
- Webler, T., "What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public", Environmental Management, 27(3) (2001)
- Wolf,S., "Comment, Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition" (1993), Princeton University Press
- Lee Y.H., "국책사업갈등예방을위한공공참여모형", 국토연구원발표자료, ~ (2003)