Debate on the Correlation Between TERRORISM and Religion: Focusing on Salafi Jihadist
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is, first, to organize the debate on the reductionism of the concept of limit-ing terrorism to non-state organizations. Second, we analyze the characteristics of culturally motivated terrorism. Third, we study the discourse on the ideological fiction and violence of Islam's Salafism. Method: In the concept of terrorism by institutions or scholars studying terrorism, they point out errors limiting the actors to non-state organizations, explain religious terrorism and political and social contexts, and try litera-ture research on logic and strategies that justify terrorism by interpreting Salafism as aggressive content. Results: The reason why the actors who commit terrorism are limited to non-state organizations is because they are limited to the interests of specific countries or organizations. Historical examples of attempts at terrorism by the state are sufficiently accumulated in other studies. The reason for the occurrence of religious terrorism is not simply to realize a society where religious ideology is realized, but social discrimination and contradictions com-bine with religious ideology, resulting in terrorism. From this point of view, Salafist terrorism can also be interpret-ed. Conclusion: Since the late 20th century, numerous terrorism has occurred mainly in Islamic society. Domestic and international disputes and system instability can provide an excuse for attacks on dissatisfied forces at any time, and incidents in which an unspecified number of people are attacked by groups armed with the name of religion will not be cut off. As so far, political oppression and military response alone are difficult to solve, so high-level complex strategies such as social reform and growth of anti-terrorism groups must be sought.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is, first, to organize the debate on the reductionism of the concept of limit-ing terrorism to non-state organizations. Second, we analyze the characteristics of culturally motivated terrorism. Third, we study the discourse on the ideological fiction and violence of Islam's Salafism. Method: In the concept of terrorism by institutions or scholars studying terrorism, they point out errors limiting the actors to non-state organizations, explain religious terrorism and political and social contexts, and try litera-ture research on logic and strategies that justify terrorism by interpreting Salafism as aggressive content. Results: The reason why the actors who commit terrorism are limited to non-state organizations is because they are limited to the interests of specific countries or organizations. Historical examples of attempts at terrorism by the state are sufficiently accumulated in other studies. The reason for the occurrence of religious terrorism is not simply to realize a society where religious ideology is realized, but social discrimination and contradictions com-bine with religious ideology, resulting in terrorism. From this point of view, Salafist terrorism can also be interpret-ed. Conclusion: Since the late 20th century, numerous terrorism has occurred mainly in Islamic society. Domestic and international disputes and system instability can provide an excuse for attacks on dissatisfied forces at any time, and incidents in which an unspecified number of people are attacked by groups armed with the name of religion will not be cut off. As so far, political oppression and military response alone are difficult to solve, so high-level complex strategies such as social reform and growth of anti-terrorism groups must be sought.
참고문헌 (26)
- 윤우석, "An Criminological Approach to Explain TERROR and Terrorism", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 6(3), pp.27~37 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Lee CH, "Threat Assessment of Terrorism and the Analysis on Anti-terrorism Policy in Korea", Korean Police Studies Review, 3(1), pp.82~110 (2004)
- Yu Byung-hu, "Theoretical Approach to Radicalization and Violent Extremism that leads to TERRORISM", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 2(2), pp.12~18 (2017), J-INSTITUTE
- Jackson R, "An Argument for Terrorism", Perspectives and on Terrorism, 2(2), pp.25~32 (2008)
- Yu Byung-hu, "Transnational Security Threat and Change of COUNTERTERRORISM Intelligence Environment", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 4(1), pp.9~14 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- Hoffman B, "Holy Terror : The Implications of Terrorism Motivated by a Religious Imperative", Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 18(4), pp.271~284 (1995)
- 홍승표, "A Study on the Influence Factors of Suicide TERRORISM", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 6(2), pp.26~41 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- 차유정, "테러발생에 영향을 미치는 국가수준의 요인: 국제 테러자료를 활용한 발달궤적모형을 중심으로", 한국테러학회보, 10(4), pp.23~53 (2017), 한국테러학회
- 양승돈, "Review of Trend Analysis of TERRORISM and KOREA's Implications", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), pp.40~47 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Tilly C, "Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists", Sociological Theory, 22(1), pp.5~13 (2004)
- Gregg HS, "Defining and Distinguishing Secular and Religious Terrorism", Perspectives on Terrorism, 8(2), pp.36~50 (2014)
- Juergensmeyer M, "Understanding the New Terrorism", Current History, 99(636), pp.158~163 (2000)
- Crenshaw M, "The Causes of Terrorism", Comparative Politics, 13(4), pp.379~399 (1981)
- Muir AM, "Terrorism and Weapons of Mass Destruction : The Case of Aum Shinrikyo", Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 22(1), pp.79~91 (1991)
- 조성택, "‘이슬람 근본주의’의 변화와 지하디스트 테러리즘에 관한 연구", 한국테러학회보, 12(2), pp.161~181 (2019), 한국테러학회
- Cho Sung-taek, "A Study on the Evolution of TERRORISM Groups in the Middle East", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 3(1), pp.11~15 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
- Mark W, "Muhammad SU, Inayah R, and Mariani Y, Salafi Violence and Sufi Tolerance?", Perspectives on Terrorism, 7(6), pp.58~78 (2013)
- Piazza JA, "Is Islamist Terrorism More Dangerous? : An Empirical Study of Group Ideology, Organization, and Goal Structure", Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(1), pp.62~88 (2009)
- Ravenscroft I, "Terrorism, Religion and Self-control : An Unexpected Connection between Conservative Religious Commitment and Terrorist Efficacy", Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(8), pp.1819~1834 (2019)
- Pollard SE, "Understanding the Islamic State’s Competitive Advantages : Remaking State and Nationhood in the Middle East and North Africa", Terrorism and Political Violence, 29(6), pp.1045~1065 (2017)
- Chalk P, "The Evolving Dynamic of Terrorism in the 1990s", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 53, pp.151~167 (1999)
- Lewis JB., "The Cambridge Comparison to Religion and Terrorism", pp.2017
- Wilkins P, "Terrorism Versus Democracy" (2006), Routledge
- Uhm HJ, "Islamism" (2015), Hankookmunhwasa
- Murata S, "Visions of Islam: Visions of Reality" (1998), Paragon House
- Tibi B., "Islamism and Islam", pp.2013