초등교사는 과학 수업에서 어떠한 딜레마를 경험하고 어떻게 대응하는가?
Which Types of Dilemmas do Elementary School Teachers Experience and How do They Cope with in Science Classes?
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we aimed to look at what dilemmas of science teaching elementary school teachers experience and how they cope with their dilemmas in everyday science classes. Three elementary school teachers participated and qualitative data such as class log, class video, and interview materials were analyzed in inductive ways. The main findings are as follows. First, the dilemmas were classified based on the four factors that make up the science class; teacher, student, learning content, environment. However the dilemmas appeared to be not only one factor involved, but the rest of the factors intertwined. Thus, it was interpreted how the main factors causing the dilemmas conflicted with other factors. Second, the types of teachers’ coping strategies to the dilemmas could be largely divided into ‘give-up’, ‘stick to’ and ‘modified’. In some cases, teachers gave up on what they valued and did not take active action (‘give-up’), teachers chose what they valued and made decisions to actively realize it (‘stick to’), and in others, conflicts were adjusted by introducing new methods or elements to their classes (‘modified’). Based on these results, we discussed that the teacher’s dilemmas could facilitate the teacher’s learning or professional development.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to look at what dilemmas of science teaching elementary school teachers experience and how they cope with their dilemmas in everyday science classes. Three elementary school teachers participated and qualitative data such as class log, class video, and interview materials were analyzed in inductive ways. The main findings are as follows. First, the dilemmas were classified based on the four factors that make up the science class; teacher, student, learning content, environment. However the dilemmas appeared to be not only one factor involved, but the rest of the factors intertwined. Thus, it was interpreted how the main factors causing the dilemmas conflicted with other factors. Second, the types of teachers’ coping strategies to the dilemmas could be largely divided into ‘give-up’, ‘stick to’ and ‘modified’. In some cases, teachers gave up on what they valued and did not take active action (‘give-up’), teachers chose what they valued and made decisions to actively realize it (‘stick to’), and in others, conflicts were adjusted by introducing new methods or elements to their classes (‘modified’). Based on these results, we discussed that the teacher’s dilemmas could facilitate the teacher’s learning or professional development.
참고문헌 (22)
- Brickhouse, N. W., "What counts as successful instruction? An account of teacher’s self account", Science Education, 77(2), pp.115~129 (1993)
- Capitelli, S., "Dilemmas in facilitating a teacher inquiry group focused on English language learners: Is there a place for an authoritative voice?", Studying Teacher Education, 11(3), pp.246~254 (2015)
- 조수진, "초등교사가 지리수업에서 겪는 딜레마와 대응 양상", 한국지리환경교육학회지, 24(4), pp.41~54 (2016), 한국지리환경교육학회[DOI]
- Corbin, J., "Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory" (2014), Sage Publications
- Creswell, J. W., "Qualitative inquiry and research design : Choosing among five approaches" (2005), Sage
- Elliott, J., "Field methods in the study of education", pp.235~262 (1985), Falmer Press
- Huberman, M., "The professional life cycle of teachers", Teachers College Record, 91(1), pp.31~57 (1989)
- 강기원, "수업 갈등과 대응 전략 : 초등 사회과 5학년 네 교사의 수업 딜레마", 초등교육연구, 16(2), pp.185~210 (2003), 한국초등교육학회
- 김희경, "교육실습에서 예비과학교사들이 경험하는 딜레마의 유형과 대처 방법", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(4), pp.657~668 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 김주영, "초등교사의 국어수업 딜레마에 대한 사례연구", 국어교육학연구, (42), pp.313~345 (2011), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- Kim, Y. C., "Qualitative research methods I" (2006), 문음사
- Lampert, M., "How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice", Harvard Educational Review, 55, pp.178~194 (1985)
- 이종봉, "한 과학 교사가 뉴턴 제1법칙을 가르치면서 경험하는 딜레마: 객관주의와 구성주의의 이분법적 사고", 교육과학연구, 43(2), pp.53~73 (2012), 교육과학연구소[DOI]
- Minstry of Education, "Elementary science teachers’guide 5-2" (2020), VisangKyoyook
- Popper-Giveon, A., "Educator versus subject matter teacher : The conflict between two subidentities in becoming a teacher", Teacher and Teaching : Theory and Practice, 23(5), pp.532~548 (2017)
- Schön, D. A., "The reflective practitioner : How professionals think in action" (1983), Basic Books
- 송현종, "초등학교 자기장 수업에서 한 교사가 경험한 딜레마에 관한 고찰", 초등과학교육, 32(1), pp.95~103 (2013), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 서근원, "교사의 딜레마와 수업의 의미", 아시아교육연구, 6(2), pp.1~40 (2005), 교육연구소
- 여상인, "개인 변인에 따른 초등교사의 초등과학수업 실행전문성 분석", 초등과학교육, 32(4), pp.535~544 (2013), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Yoon, K. Y., "The relationship between the developmental stage and the instructional professionalism of elementary school teachers", Journal of Elementary Educational Studies, 14(2), pp.59~76 (2007)
- Yoon, H. -G., "An use of dilemma episodes in science teacher education", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(2), pp.98~110 (2005)
- 윤혜경, "과학 실험 실습 교육에서 초등 교사가 느끼는 딜레마", 초등과학교육, 27(2), pp.102~116 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회