본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등학교 과학 탐구 수업 실행의 저해 요인에 대한 교사들의 인식 분석

Analysis of Elementary Teachers' Views on Barriers in Implementing Inquiry-based Instructions

김효남|양일호|조현준|한인경
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2008.12|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제28권 제8호|pp. 901-921

0

조회

0

다운로드

59

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

inquiryelementary teacherbarriers to inquiryinquiry-based experience
주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary teachers' views on the barriers in implementing inquiry-based instruction in science education. For this, semi-structured in-depth interviews were performed with 22 elementary school teachers who have served for more than five years in the Gyeonggi province. The interview questions were developed through triangulation of Seidman's phase to achieve reliability in the interview data, then interview questions were modified and completed through an analytic induction method in pre-interviews. In-depth interviews were performed individually and all the interviews were recorded. The data of teachers' views on the barriers were categorized and analyzed into external and internal factors of teachers. The study found that the external factors referred by teachers included the following; the lack of a unit time, lack of materials and equipments, too many students in a class, problems in science curriculum management, difficulty in the assessment of students' inquiry activities, the students' learning, lack of opportunities for teaching inquiry activities, harmfulness of accidents, and so on. Internal factors included the following; lack of preparation for inquiry activities, lack of self-confidence, lack of patience, and so on. The various barriers presented and their causes were analyzed in detail, and possible efforts in activating inquiry activities in elementary science education were suggested.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary teachers' views on the barriers in implementing inquiry-based instruction in science education. For this, semi-structured in-depth interviews were performed with 22 elementary school teachers who have served for more than five years in the Gyeonggi province. The interview questions were developed through triangulation of Seidman's phase to achieve reliability in the interview data, then interview questions were modified and completed through an analytic induction method in pre-interviews. In-depth interviews were performed individually and all the interviews were recorded. The data of teachers' views on the barriers were categorized and analyzed into external and internal factors of teachers. The study found that the external factors referred by teachers included the following; the lack of a unit time, lack of materials and equipments, too many students in a class, problems in science curriculum management, difficulty in the assessment of students' inquiry activities, the students' learning, lack of opportunities for teaching inquiry activities, harmfulness of accidents, and so on. Internal factors included the following; lack of preparation for inquiry activities, lack of self-confidence, lack of patience, and so on. The various barriers presented and their causes were analyzed in detail, and possible efforts in activating inquiry activities in elementary science education were suggested.

참고문헌 (69)

  1. 김정애, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 3, 4학년 과학 교과서의 체제와 내용에 대한 인식 조사", 초등과학교육, 22(1), pp.37~50 (2003), 한국초등과학교육학회
  2. 김찬진, "사설학원 없는 교육환경 조성", 경제교 육연구, 8(1), pp.33~49 (2002)
  3. 노석구, "제7차 과학과 교육과정에 관한 초등교사의 인식", 초등과학교육, 21(2), pp.213~226 (2002), 한국초등과학교육학회
  4. 박정희, "탐구 학습에 관한 중등 과학 교사들의 인식", 한국지구과학회지, 25(8), pp.731~738 (2004), 한국지구과학회
  5. 박현주, "중학생의 학원 과학교육과 학교 과학교육에 대한 인식 조사", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), pp.309~319 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  6. 송경혜, "초등학교 고학년 학생의 과학 탐구능력 측정을 위한 평가 도구 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1245~1255 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  7. 신현옥, "초등 과학 포트폴리오 평가와 다른 과학 평가 방법 간의 상관관계 분석", 초등과학교육, 24(3), pp.301~309 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
  8. 양일호, "초등과학교육에서 실험활동의 목적에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 6(1), pp.235~252 (2006), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  9. 제7차 교육과정 개정에 따른 교과 교육과정 개발 체제에 관한 연구, "이돈희", 한국교육개발원, 12~21, pp.연구 보고 CR 97-36 (1997)
  10. 이명제, "과학 교육과정 개혁 연구의 쟁점들", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.916~929 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  11. 이봉우, "외국 과학교육과정의 탐구기준 비교 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(7), pp.873~884 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
  12. 이양락, "교육과정 개발 체제 및 총론과 과학과 교육과정의 연계성 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), pp.468~480 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  13. 이현욱, "중고등학교 과학 교사의 탐구 수업 환경 요인에 관한 연구", 한국과 학교육학회지, 18(3), pp.443~450 (1998)
  14. 임채성, "초등학교 ‘ö과학’교과서와 ‘ö실험관찰’ö 생물영역의 탐구요구수준 분석", 2002년 한국생물교육학회 하계 학술발표대회 초록집 (2002), 한국생물교육학회
  15. 정은영, "초등학교 과학과 실험 및 관찰 수업 사례에서 나타난 수업의 문제점 : 도시 지역의 수업 사례를 중심으로", 초등과학교육, 23(4), pp.287~286 (2004), 한국초등과학교육학회
  16. 한기애, "제7차 초등학교 과학과 교사용 지도서의 활용 실태 분석", 초등과학교육, 22(1), pp.51~64 (2003), 한국초등과학교육학회
  17. 홍미영, "우리나라 중학생들의 과학적 탐구 및 과학의 본성 영역에서의 국제 성취도 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(2), pp.336~344 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
  18. 홍미영, "초등학교 과학 수업에서의 실험실 안전 교육 내용 분석", 교육과정평가연구, 7(2), pp.267~283 (2004), 한국교육과정평가원
  19. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Inquiry in science education: International perspectives", Science Education, 88(3), pp.397~419 (2004)
  20. Adams, P.E., "Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teacher", Science Education, 81(1), pp.29~50 (1997)
  21. Akerson. V.L., "How do elementary teachers compensate for incomplete science content knowledge", Research in Science Education, 35(2), pp.245~268 (2005)
  22. Akerson, V.L., "The influence of young children's ideas in science on teaching practice", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), pp.363~385 (2000)
  23. Anderson, R.D., "Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), pp.1~12 (2002)
  24. Anderson, R.D., "The Ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), pp.3~16 (2001)
  25. Baxter, L.A., "The basics of communication research", pp.2004, Wadsworth
  26. Beck, J., "An exploratory study of teachers' beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classrooms", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), pp.323~343 (2000)
  27. Bradley, A., "Zeroing in on teachers: Quality counts '99", Education Week, 18(17), pp.46~52 (1999)
  28. Brown, P.L., "College science teachers' views of classroom inquiry", Science Education, 90(5), pp.784~802 (2006)
  29. Bryan, L.A., "Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher's belief system about science teaching and learning", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), pp.835~868 (2003)
  30. Bybee, R.W., "Scientific inquiry and science teaching", pp.1~14 (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  31. Costenson, K., "Why isn't inquiry used in more classrooms", The American Biology Teacher, 48(3), pp.150~158 (1986)
  32. Davis, K.S., "Change is hard: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices", Science Education, 87(1), pp.3~30 (2003)
  33. Dickinson, V.L., "How to succeed in physics without really crying", Science and Children, 33(8), pp.37~38 (1996)
  34. Furtak, E.M., "The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching", Science Education, 90(3), pp.453~467 (2006)
  35. Gallagher, J., "Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science", Science Education, 75(1), pp.121~133 (1991)
  36. Hassard, J., "The art of teaching science: Inquiry and innovation in middle school and high school" (2005), Oxford University Press
  37. Hogan, K., "Teachers as inquiry learners", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(1), pp.1~25 (2000)
  38. Ibrahim, A.I., "Design and initial validation of an instrument for measuring teacher beliefs and experiences related to inquiry teaching and learning and scientific inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation" (2003), The Ohio State University
  39. Inverness Research Associates, "Critical elements for the systemic reform of elementary education in urban districts(Reform: Supporting Reform Report. (pp. Ⅲ-21- 22). Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http:", reports, pp.reports_proj.html.pdf.[DOI]
  40. Jarrett, O.S., "Playfulness: A motivatior in elementary science teacher preparation", School Science and Mathematics, 98(4), pp.181~187 (1998)
  41. Krajcik, J., "Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms", pp.283~315 (2000), AAAS Publication
  42. Kuhn, D., "The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning", Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), pp.495~523 (2000)
  43. Luera, G.R., "Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), pp.241~258 (2005)
  44. Mao, S., "Impacts of an inquiry teaching method on earth science students' learning outcomes and attitudes at the secondary school level", Proceedings of the National Science Council Part D: Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 8(3), pp.93~101 (1998)
  45. Miles, M.B., "Qualitative data analysis" (1994), Sage Publications
  46. Minichiello, V., "In-depth interviewing: Principals, techniques, analysis" (1995), Longman
  47. National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy of Science Press
  48. National Research Council, "Inquiry and the national science education standards" (2000), National Academy of Science Press
  49. Plourde, L.A., "The influence of student teaching on preservice elementary teachers' science selfefficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs", Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(4), pp.245~253 (2002)
  50. Rankin, L., "Lessons learned: Addressing common misconceptions about inquiry by Lynn Rankin. In foundations, a monograph for professionals in science, mathematics, and technology education" (2000), The National Science Foundation
  51. Reiff, R., "If inquiry is so great, why isn't everyone doing it", Paper presented at the annual international conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (2002)
  52. Roehrig, G.H., "Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons", International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), pp.3~24 (2004)
  53. Rop, C.F., "The meaning of student inquiry questions: A teacher's beliefs and responses", International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), pp.717~736 (2002)
  54. Seidman, I., "Interviewing as qualitative research" (1998), Teachers College Press
  55. Shapiro, B., "A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “ôface of science that does not yet know”ô", Science Education, 80(5), pp.535~560 (1996)
  56. Smolleck, L.D., "The development and validation of an instrument to measure preservice teachers' self-efficacy in regard to the teaching of science as inquiry", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(2), pp.137~163 (2006)
  57. Stevens, C., "Elementary preservice teachers knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics", School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), pp.2~9 (1996)
  58. Thompson, S.L., "of a framework to measure science teachers' inquiry perceptions and practices", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (2003)
  59. Tobin, K., "Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum", Science Education, 80(2), pp.223~241 (1996)
  60. Tosun, T., "The beliefs of preservice elementary teachers toward science and science teaching", School Science and Mathematics, 100(7), pp.374~379 (2000)
  61. Trautmann, N., "What makes inquiry so hard?(And why is it worth it?)", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (2004)
  62. Uno, G.E., "Learning about learning through teaching about inquiry" (1997), Saunders College Publishing
  63. Van Driel, J.H., "Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), pp.147~158 (2001)
  64. Veermans, M., "Patterns of guidance in inquiry learning", Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(2), pp.179~194 (2005)
  65. Wellington, J.J., "Practical work in school : Time for a re-appraisal", pp.3~15 (1998), Routledge
  66. Wenglinsky, H., "How teaching matters: Bringing the Classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.", ~ (2000)
  67. White, R.T., "The link between the laboratory and teaching", International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), pp.761~774 (1996)
  68. Windschitl, M., "Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experience reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice", Science Teacher Education, 87(1), pp.112~143 (2003)
  69. Yung, B.H.W., "Three views of fairness in a school-based assessment scheme of practical work in biology", International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), pp.985~1005 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

초등학교 과학과 자유탐구 활동에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움 분석김효남, 신현화한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2010 · 제29권 제3호초등과학 수업에서 실험 활동에 대한 교사들의 내적 요인 조사양일호, 이소리, 이윤경, 임재근한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2010 · 제29권 제1호초등학교 교사들의 과학적 탐구 및 지도 방법에 관한 신념 연구이상균대한지구과학교육학회 · 대한지구과학교육학회지2012 · 제5권 제2호과학 실험 수업에 대한 초등학생들의 인식 분석손정주, 신애경, 양일호, 정재훈, 조현준한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2008 · 제27권 제2호초등학교 교사의 탐구에 대한 신념과 과학과 수행평가의 실제고민석, 김은애, 양일호, 허진미대한지구과학교육학회 · 대한지구과학교육학회지2013 · 제6권 제2호초점집단 면담을 통한 초등교사의 과학 체험학습 운영에서 겪는 어려움 분석강헌태, 권난주, 권혁재, 성혜진, 신영준, 전상일과학교육연구소 · 과학교육연구지2018 · 제42권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

연소 개념 학습에서 변칙 사례에 의한 인지 갈등 및 상황 흥미가 개념 변화 과정에 미치는 영향강석진, 최숙영, 노태희pp. 779-785귀추 추리 전략을 통한 과학영재를 위한 창의적 교수-학습 프로그램의 제안오준영, 강용희, 김상수pp. 786-795과학영재의 물리개념 이해에 관한 사고모형이영미, 김성원pp. 796-813초등학교 과학수업에서 과학동시를 활용하는 전략의 개발과 적용권난주, 정신애pp. 814-822과학 영재아 부모들의 부모교육에 대한 인식민보경, 김성원pp. 823-831
원문 보기