본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가맹계약 종료후의 경업금지의무

Franchisee's duty to not engage in competitive business after franchise agreement termination

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Franchise business transaction is a continuous business relationship in which the franchisor supports and trains the franchisee and receives franchise fee for payment in order to sell their products(goods) and services effectively. There is possibility of growth for both the franchisor and the franchisee through this relationship because the franchisor is provided with funds and workforce that had been lacking and the franchisee gets to use the franchise brand image and is able to learn business know-how. Franchise business transaction showed rapid growth in a short period of time and holds a significant portion in the market within United States, where franchising was first introduced, and in Korea as well. Such circumstances are due to the fact that franchising is highly advantageous in forming nationwide distribution network with relatively low cost and short time. The franchise agreement that lays the foundation of franchise business transaction is a continuous contract based on trust between the franchisor and the franchisee and the franchisor supplies the franchisee with their inner information including trade secrets and know-how. Therefore, the franchisee's misuse of confidential information or the act of doing same or similar business with that of the franchisor fundamentally destroys the trust between the franchisor and the franchisee. Generally, provisions about the franchisee's duty not to engage in competitive business or duty of confidentiality are provided to prevent the franchisee from engaging in competitive business or divulging trade secrets in the course of agreeing on the franchise agreement. However, imposing the duty not to engage in competitive business restricts the franchisee's freedom to choose an occupation or freedom of running a business. Furthermore, there is a possibility that the duty may impede fair trade. The franchisor and the franchisee often face conflict of interest owing to such limitations following the duty. This paper deals with the duty not to engage in competitive business after the franchise agreement termination in accordance with situations mentioned above. After examining the significance of the duty, the legal system and court cases regarding franchising in the United States and the judgement structure of the duty will be considered.

Abstract

Franchise business transaction is a continuous business relationship in which the franchisor supports and trains the franchisee and receives franchise fee for payment in order to sell their products(goods) and services effectively. There is possibility of growth for both the franchisor and the franchisee through this relationship because the franchisor is provided with funds and workforce that had been lacking and the franchisee gets to use the franchise brand image and is able to learn business know-how. Franchise business transaction showed rapid growth in a short period of time and holds a significant portion in the market within United States, where franchising was first introduced, and in Korea as well. Such circumstances are due to the fact that franchising is highly advantageous in forming nationwide distribution network with relatively low cost and short time. The franchise agreement that lays the foundation of franchise business transaction is a continuous contract based on trust between the franchisor and the franchisee and the franchisor supplies the franchisee with their inner information including trade secrets and know-how. Therefore, the franchisee's misuse of confidential information or the act of doing same or similar business with that of the franchisor fundamentally destroys the trust between the franchisor and the franchisee. Generally, provisions about the franchisee's duty not to engage in competitive business or duty of confidentiality are provided to prevent the franchisee from engaging in competitive business or divulging trade secrets in the course of agreeing on the franchise agreement. However, imposing the duty not to engage in competitive business restricts the franchisee's freedom to choose an occupation or freedom of running a business. Furthermore, there is a possibility that the duty may impede fair trade. The franchisor and the franchisee often face conflict of interest owing to such limitations following the duty. This paper deals with the duty not to engage in competitive business after the franchise agreement termination in accordance with situations mentioned above. After examining the significance of the duty, the legal system and court cases regarding franchising in the United States and the judgement structure of the duty will be considered.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 강병열, "가맹사업거래에 관한 법적 연구 : 가맹점사업자의 보호제도를 중심으로", 박사, 상법, pp.2004
  2. 구재군, "프랜차이즈 계약에 관한 연구", 박사, 민법, pp.2000
  3. 박정기, "계약종료후의 부수의무 ― 독일에 있어서 계약의 여후효이론과 관련하여 ―", 부산수산대학교 인문ㆍ사회과학논문집, 50, pp.59~ (1994)
  4. 송인방, "가맹점 창업자 보호에 관한 법적 검토 -부당한 위약금에 대한 규제를 중심으로-", 법학연구, (50), pp.137~163 (2013), 한국법학회
  5. 염규석, "동북아 경제중심 국가에 따른 프랜차이즈 (가맹사업) 법제 정비 방향", 경영법률, 23(1), pp.65~93 (2012), 한국경영법률학회
  6. 이달휴, "근로자의 경업금지의무와 계약", 노동법학, (34), pp.33~62 (2010), 한국노동법학회
  7. 장재현, "계약종료후의 계약의 효력 ― 여후효, 계약법의 현대적 과제", pp.263~264 (2007), 경북대학교 출판부
  8. 최영홍, "가맹계약론" (2003), 프랜차이즈시스템연구소
  9. 최영홍, "경업금지특약의 유효요건 - 미국 가맹계약을 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 27(1), pp.123~154 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  10. 최영홍, "가맹계약의 해지에 대한 규제와 그 한계", 비교사법, 14(2), pp.253~284 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
  11. Peter J. Klarfeld, "Covenants Against Competition in Franchise Agreements" (2003), American Bar Association
  12. Robert W. Emerson, "Franchise Contract Clauses and the Franchisor's Duty of Care Toward Its Franchisees", N.C.L. Rev, 72, pp.905~ (1994)
  13. Robert W. Emerson, "Franchising Covenants Against Competition", Iowa L. Rev, 80, pp.1049~ (1995)
  14. Ted P. Pearce, "The Enforcements of Post-Termination Remedies in the Franchise Contract", Okla. City U.L. Rev, 24, pp.81~ (1999)
  15. Benjamin A. Levin, "Who Owns Goodwill at The Franchised Location?", Franchise L. J, 18, pp.85~ (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)