Comparison of different cementing techniques for cement penetration under tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the differences in cement penetration between cementing techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated knee undergone TKA at our hospital for both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) evaluations. Cementing was performed with hand mixing and hand packing (HM group) and with vacuum mixing and cement gun use (VM group). We measured the area under the tibial baseplate (sclerotic and non-sclerotic sides) and compared the mean and maximum depths of cement penetration at each area. Results: Of the 44 knees evaluated, 20 and 24 knees were in the HM and VM groups, respectively. At the center of the sclerotic side, the mean penetration depths (2.0 ± 0.7 and 2.5 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.02) and the maximum penetration depths (4.0 ± 0.9 and 5.0 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.02) were significantly deeper in the VM group than in the HM group. The correlation between preoperative Hounsfield unit (HU) values and mean penetration were r = –0.617 (p < 0.01) and –0.373 (p = 0.01) in the HM and VM groups, respectively. Conclusion: The cementing technique of vacuum mixing and using a cement gun allowed for deeper cement penetration compared to the hand mixing and hand packing technique, even in bone sclerotic sites.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the differences in cement penetration between cementing techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated knee undergone TKA at our hospital for both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) evaluations. Cementing was performed with hand mixing and hand packing (HM group) and with vacuum mixing and cement gun use (VM group). We measured the area under the tibial baseplate (sclerotic and non-sclerotic sides) and compared the mean and maximum depths of cement penetration at each area. Results: Of the 44 knees evaluated, 20 and 24 knees were in the HM and VM groups, respectively. At the center of the sclerotic side, the mean penetration depths (2.0 ± 0.7 and 2.5 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.02) and the maximum penetration depths (4.0 ± 0.9 and 5.0 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.02) were significantly deeper in the VM group than in the HM group. The correlation between preoperative Hounsfield unit (HU) values and mean penetration were r = –0.617 (p < 0.01) and –0.373 (p = 0.01) in the HM and VM groups, respectively. Conclusion: The cementing technique of vacuum mixing and using a cement gun allowed for deeper cement penetration compared to the hand mixing and hand packing technique, even in bone sclerotic sites.
참고문헌 (25)
- Nagira K, "Total knee arthroplasty in the past three decades : trends in patient characteristics and implant survivorship", Mod Rheumatol, 32, pp.432~437 (2022)
- Pietrzak J, "Have the frequency of and reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty changed since 2000? Comparison of two cohorts from the same hospital : 255 cases(2013–2016)and 68 cases(1991–1998)", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 105, pp.639~645 (2019)
- Kurtz S, "Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, pp.780~785 (2007)
- "American joint replacement registry annual report" (2021)[URL]
- Nivbrant NO, "Cementless versus cemented tibial fixation in posterior stabilized total knee replacement : a randomized trial", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 102, pp.1075~1082 (2020)
- Verburg H, "Reliability of two different measuring techniques with computer tomography for penetration and distribution of cement in the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 21, pp.374~ (2020)
- DenOtter TD, "Hounsfield unit. StatPearls" (2023), StatPearls Publishing
- Bolus D, "Effective use of the Hounsfield unit in the age of variable energy CT", Abdom Radiol, 42, pp.766~771 (2017)
- Lee DH, "Comparative study of lumbar bone mineral content using DXA and CT Hounsfield unit values in chest CT", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 24, pp.94~ (2023)
- Kim MW, "Assessing bone mineral density in weight-bearing regions of the body through texture analysis of abdomen and pelvis CT Hounsfield unit", Diagnostics, 13, pp.2968~ (2023)
- Refsum AM, "Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty : a scoping review", Acta Orthop, 90, pp.582~589 (2019)
- Ahn JH, "The effect of multiple drilling on a sclerotic proximal tibia during total knee arthroplasty", Int Orthop, 39, pp.1077~1083 (2015)
- Dempster DW, "Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry : a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee", J Bone Miner Res, 28, pp.2~17 (2013)
- Nagira K, "Histological scoring system for subchondral bone changes in murine models of joint aging and osteoarthritis", Sci Rep, 10, pp.10077~ (2020)
- Sasaki R, "Pressurized carbon dioxide lavage reduces the incidence of a radiolucent line around the tibial component two years after total knee arthroplasty", J Orthop Surg Res, 17, pp.349~ (2022)
- Vanlommel J, "Cementing the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty : which technique is the best?", J Arthroplasty, 26, pp.492~496 (2011)
- Hampton CB, "Aseptic loosening at the tibia in total knee arthroplasty: a function of cement mantle quality?", J Arthroplasty, 35, pp.S190~S196 (2020)
- Schlegel UJ, "Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components", Int Orthop, 35, pp.1165~1169 (2011)
- Gapinski ZA, "The effect of tourniquet use and sterile carbon dioxide gas bone preparation on cement penetration in primary total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 34, pp.1634~1639 (2019)
- Cacciola G, "Does negative pressure intrusion cementing technique improve the cement penetration under the tibial component? A comparative retrospective study", J Orthop, 19, pp.72~75 (2020)
- Lutz MJ, "The effect of cement gun and cement syringe use on the tibial cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.461~467 (2009)
- Han HS, "Cementing technique affects the rate of femoral component loosening after high flexion total knee arthroplasty", Knee, 24, pp.1435~1441 (2017)
- Billi F, "Techniques for improving the initial strength of the tibial tray-cement interface bond", Bone Joint J, 101-B(1_Supple_A), pp.53~58 (2019)
- Schlegel UJ, "An in vitro comparison of tibial tray cementation using gun pressurization or pulsed lavage", Int Orthop, 38, pp.967~971 (2014)
- van de Groes SA, "Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty", Knee, 20, pp.186~190 (2013)