본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Bone remodeling and implant migration of uncemented femoral and cemented asymmetrical tibial components in total knee arthroplasty - DXA and RSA evaluation with 2-year follow up

Yilmaz Müjgan|Holm Christina Enciso|Lind Thomas|Flivik Gunnar|Odgaard Anders|Petersen Michael Mørk
대한슬관절학회 (Korean Knee Society)|2021.12|Knee Surgery and Related Research|제33권 |pp. 25-25|DOI 10.1186/s43019-021-00111-5

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Aseptic loosening is one of the major reasons for late revision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of aseptic loosening can be detected using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), whereby micromovements (migration) can be measured, and thus RSA is recommended in the phased introduction of orthopedic implants. Decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by dual-energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA), is related to the breaking strength of the bone, which is measured concurrently by RSA. The aim of the study was to evaluate bone remodeling and implant migration with cemented asymmetrical tibial and uncemented femoral components after TKA with a follow up period of 2 years.This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 29 patients (number of female/male patients 17/12, mean age 65.2 years), received a hybrid Persona® TKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) consisting of a cemented tibial, an all-polyethylene patella, and uncemented trabecular metal femoral components. Follow up: preoperative, 1 week, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, and double examinations for RSA and DXA were performed at 12 months. RSA results were presented as maximal total point of motion (MTPM) and segmental motion (translation and rotation), and DXA results were presented as changes in BMD in different regions of interest (ROI).MTPM at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 0.65 mm, 0.84 mm, 0.92 mm, and 0.96 mm for the femoral component and 0.54 mm, 0.60 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.68 mm, respectively, for the tibial component. The highest MTPM occurred within the first 3 months. Afterwards most of the curves flattened and stabilized. Between 12 and 24 months after surgery, 16% of femoral components had migrated by more than 0.10 mm and 15% of tibial components had migrated by more than 0.2 mm. Percentage change in BMD in each ROI for distal femur was as follows: ROI I 26.7%, ROI II 9.2% and ROI III 3.3%. BMD and at the proximal tibia: ROI I 8.2%, ROI II 8.6% and ROI III 7.0% after 2 years compared with 1 week postoperative results. There was no significant correlation between maximal percentwise change in BMD and MTPM after 2 years.Migration patterns and changes in BMD related to femoral components after TKA in our study correspond well with previous studies; we observed marginally greater migration with the tibial component.

Abstract

Aseptic loosening is one of the major reasons for late revision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of aseptic loosening can be detected using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), whereby micromovements (migration) can be measured, and thus RSA is recommended in the phased introduction of orthopedic implants. Decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by dual-energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA), is related to the breaking strength of the bone, which is measured concurrently by RSA. The aim of the study was to evaluate bone remodeling and implant migration with cemented asymmetrical tibial and uncemented femoral components after TKA with a follow up period of 2 years.This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 29 patients (number of female/male patients 17/12, mean age 65.2 years), received a hybrid Persona® TKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) consisting of a cemented tibial, an all-polyethylene patella, and uncemented trabecular metal femoral components. Follow up: preoperative, 1 week, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, and double examinations for RSA and DXA were performed at 12 months. RSA results were presented as maximal total point of motion (MTPM) and segmental motion (translation and rotation), and DXA results were presented as changes in BMD in different regions of interest (ROI).MTPM at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 0.65 mm, 0.84 mm, 0.92 mm, and 0.96 mm for the femoral component and 0.54 mm, 0.60 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.68 mm, respectively, for the tibial component. The highest MTPM occurred within the first 3 months. Afterwards most of the curves flattened and stabilized. Between 12 and 24 months after surgery, 16% of femoral components had migrated by more than 0.10 mm and 15% of tibial components had migrated by more than 0.2 mm. Percentage change in BMD in each ROI for distal femur was as follows: ROI I 26.7%, ROI II 9.2% and ROI III 3.3%. BMD and at the proximal tibia: ROI I 8.2%, ROI II 8.6% and ROI III 7.0% after 2 years compared with 1 week postoperative results. There was no significant correlation between maximal percentwise change in BMD and MTPM after 2 years.Migration patterns and changes in BMD related to femoral components after TKA in our study correspond well with previous studies; we observed marginally greater migration with the tibial component.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Gøthesen O, "Survival rates and causes of revision in cemented primary total knee replacement: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994–2009", Bone Joint J, 95-b(5), pp.636~642 (2013)
  2. Robertsson O, "The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997 : an update with special emphasis on 41, 223knees operated on in 1988-1997", Acta Orthop Scand, 72(5), pp.503~513 (2001)[DOI]
  3. Gandhi R, "Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement : a meta-analysis", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91(7), pp.889~895 (2009)
  4. Malchau H, "Introducing new technology: a stepwise algorithm", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(3), pp.285~ (2000)
  5. Nelissen RG, "RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93(Suppl 3), pp.62~65 (2011)[DOI]
  6. Ryd L, "Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77(3), pp.377~383 (1995)
  7. Henricson A, "Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 27(4), pp.1251~1258 (2019)[DOI]
  8. Selvik G, "Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system", Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 232, pp.1~51 (1989)
  9. Hurschler C, "Comparison of the model-based and marker-based roentgen stereophotogrammetry methods in a typical clinical setting", J Arthroplast, 24(4), pp.594~606 (2009)[DOI]
  10. Trozzi C, "Precision assessment of model-based RSA for a total knee prosthesis in a biplanar set-up", Knee, 15(5), pp.396~402 (2008)[DOI]
  11. Glüer CC, "Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dualenergy radiography", Radiology, 174(1), pp.223~228 (1990)[DOI]
  12. Mazess RB, "Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)", Ann Chir Gynaecol, 77(5–6), pp.197~203 (1988)
  13. Hvid I, "Remodeling of the tibial plateau after knee replacement. CT bone densitometry", Acta Orthop Scand, 59(5), pp.567~573 (1988)[DOI]
  14. Karbowski A, "Periprosthetic bone remodelling after total knee arthroplasty: early assessment by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 119(5–6), pp.324~326 (1999)[DOI]
  15. Levitz CL, "Long-term changes in bone mineral density following total knee replacement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (321), pp.68~72 (1995)
  16. Petersen MM, "Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 25 knees", Acta Orthop Scand, 66(6), pp.513~516 (1995)[DOI]
  17. Regnér LR, "Bone mineral and migratory patterns in uncemented total knee arthroplasties : a randomized 5-year follow-up study of 38 knees", Acta Orthop Scand, 70(6), pp.603~608 (1999)[DOI]
  18. Petersen MM, "Decreased bone density of the distal femur after uncemented knee arthroplasty. A 1-year follow-up of 29 knees", Acta Orthop Scand, 67(4), pp.339~344 (1996)[DOI]
  19. Hansson T, "Nachemson A(1980)The bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 5(1), pp.46~55 (1976)[DOI]
  20. Hvid I, "Bone mineral assay : its relation to the mechanical strength of cancellous bone", Eng Med, 14(2), pp.79~83 (1985)[DOI]
  21. Petersen MM, "The relation between trabecular bone strength and bone mineral density assessed by dual photon and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in the proximal tibia", Calcif Tissue Int, 59(4), pp.311~314 (1996)[DOI]
  22. Valstar ER, "Modelbased Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants", J Biomech, 34(6), pp.715~722 (2001)[DOI]
  23. Kaptein BL, "Clinical validation of model-based RSA for a total knee prosthesis", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 464, pp.205~209 (2007)[DOI]
  24. Valstar ER, "Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry(RSA)of implants", Acta Orthop, 76(4), pp.563~572 (2005)[DOI]
  25. Insall JN, "Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (248), pp.13~14 (1989)
  26. Dawson J, "Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(1), pp.63~69 (1998)[DOI]
  27. Park JW, "Simultaneous cemented and cementless total knee replacement in the same patients : a prospective comparison of long-term outcomes using an identical design of NexGen prosthesis", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 93(11), pp.1479~1486 (2011)
  28. Pijls BG, "Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision : a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21, 000 knee arthroplasties", Acta Orthop, 83(6), pp.614~624 (2012)[DOI]
  29. Pijls BG, "RSA migration of total knee replacements", Acta Orthop, 89(3), pp.320~328 (2018)[DOI]
  30. Gao F, "Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years : a prospective randomised controlled RSA study", Knee, 16(3), pp.200~206 (2009)[DOI]
  31. Nilsson KG, "Femoral component migration in total knee arthroplasty : randomized study comparing cemented and uncemented fixation of the Miller-Galante I design", J Orthop Res, 13(3), pp.347~356 (1995)[DOI]
  32. van Ooij B, "What is the role of cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty? The two-year results of a randomized RSA controlled trial", Bone Joint J, 103-b(1), pp.98~104 (2021)
  33. Laende EK, "Predictive value of short-term migration in determining long-term stable fixation in cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties", Bone Joint J, 101-b(7_Supple_C), pp.55~60 (2019)
  34. Laende EK, "Equivalent 2-year stabilization of uncemented tibial component migration despite higher early migration compared with cemented fixation : an RSA study on 360 total knee arthroplasties", Acta Orthop, 90(2), pp.172~178 (2019)[DOI]
  35. Abu-Rajab RB, "Peri-prosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88(5), pp.606~613 (2006)
  36. Andersen MR, "bone remodeling of the distal femur after uncemented total knee arthroplasty-a 2-year prospective DXA study", J Clin Densitom, 21(2), pp.236~243 (2018)[DOI]
  37. Hernandez-Vaquero D, "Influence of the tibial stem design on bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty : a prospective seven-year follow-up study", Int Orthop, 32(1), pp.47~51 (2008)[DOI]
  38. Järvenpää J, "Changes in bone mineral density of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty : a 7-year DEXA follow-up comparing results between obese and nonobese patients", Knee, 21(1), pp.232~235 (2014)[DOI]
  39. Jaroma A, "Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty", Acta Orthop, 87(3), pp.268~273 (2016)[DOI]
  40. DiGioia AM, "Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. A literature review and treatment algorithm", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (271), pp.135~142 (1991)
  41. Herrera DA, "Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty : systematic review of 415 cases(1981-2006)", Acta Orthop, 79(1), pp.22~27 (2008)[DOI]
  42. Rorabeck CH, "Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty", Orthop Clin North Am, 30(2), pp.265~277 (1999)[DOI]
  43. Strømsøe K, "The relation between mechanical properties and bone mineral of condylar cancellous bone of the femur", Eur J Exp Musculoskel Res, 3, pp.17~24 (1992)
  44. Minoda Y, "Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92(3), pp.700~706 (2010)[DOI]
  45. Soininvaara TA, "Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69patients", Acta Orthop Scand, 75(5), pp.600~605 (2004)[DOI]
  46. Rathsach Andersen M, "Bone remodeling of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty : secondary endpoints analyzed from a randomized trial comparing monoblock and modular tibia trays-2 year follow-up of 53 cases", Acta Orthop, 90(5), pp.479~483 (2019)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of different cementing techniques for cement penetration under tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective observational studyHaruhisa Kanaya, Hideki Nagashima, Ikuta Hayashi, Keita Nagira, Koji Ishida, Makoto Enokida, Yu Okuno대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2024 · 제36권 Cement Mantle Thickness at the Bone Cement Interface in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of PS150 RP and LPS­-Flex Knee Implants이 송, 고동오, 김경태, 김진우, 이성민, 이재일대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2017 · 제29권 제2호Bone Mineral Density Changes After Total Knee Replacement in Women Over the Age of 65원예연, 한명훈대한골대사학회 · 대한골대사학회지2013 · 제20권 제2호Full Cementation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Constrained Condylar Knee Prosthesis with an Average 7-Year Follow-up권기태, 김도훈, 이운상, 한규영대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2017 · 제29권 제4호Tibiofemoral articulation and axial tibial rotation of the knee after a cruciate retaining total knee arthroplastyChaochao Zhou, Guoan Li, Hany Bedair, Jia Yu, Sophia Li, Timothy Foster대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2024 · 제36권 A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of Press Fit Condylar Rotating-Platform High-Flexion and Low Contact Stress Mobile Bearing Prosthesis in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short term Results이범구, 이용석, Ji Hoon Kwak, Nam Ki Kim, Shin Woo Nam대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2012 · 제24권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (46건)

A systematic review comparing the results of early vs delayed ligament surgeries in single anterior cruciate ligament and multiligament knee injuries박용범, Lee Han-Jun, Pujol Nicolas, Han Sang-Jin, Kim Seong Hwan, Kim Dong-Hyunpp. 1-1Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplastyChoi Sang Min, Mittal Anurag, Meshram Prashant, Kim Woo Hyun, Kim Tae Kyunpp. 2-2Outcomes of one-stage reconstruction for chronic multiligament injuries of kneeGoyal Tarun, Paul Souvik, Banerjee Sushovan, Das Lakshmanapp. 3-3Change of joint-line convergence angle should be considered for accurate alignment correction in high tibial osteotomy심재앙, Na Young Gon, Lee Beom Koo, Choi Ji Uk, Lee Byung Hoonpp. 4-4Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological studyJabes Nicolás, Infante Carlos, Ferrer Gonzalo, Barahona Maximiliano, Reyes Nicolás O., Iñiguez Magaly, Duboy Jaime, Negrín Robertopp. 5-5
원문 보기