본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中国传统复仇制度与现代法治的矛盾与平衡 - 以张扣扣复仇杀人案为引入 -

Contradiction and balance between traditional revenge system and modern rule of law in China - explained by the Case of Zhang Koukou

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

中国传统的仁义道德于礼法体系举足轻重,影响深远直至当今社会。在现代法律制度中,存在某些法律规定或司法实践与传统道德严重冲突的情境,近年发生的著名的张扣扣案便是典型。本文从该案切入,着眼于中国传统复仇观念及其制度规则,探究传统复仇制度与现代法治之间所产生的矛盾。中国传统复仇制度得到儒家思想的有力支撑,主要由经书规范与法律规制构成,具有一套详细繁琐的制度规范,尽可能实现对复仇的限制与合理化。儒家经典奠定了传统复仇观念,经书对复仇行为的前提、对象、主体进行限制性要求,且在复仇结果上要求以命偿命。从经书规范中超脱出来,逐渐形成一些关于复仇的法律规制。国家法虽大体呈现出禁止复仇的规则状态,但在儒家复仇观念支配下仍要进行个案把握与平衡,复仇成为传统中国的礼法冲突问题。与传统复仇理念相关,在法制体系中“义绝”离婚制度、“杀人移乡”制度、杀人私和的禁止、复仇处理权的限制性规范都属相关的预防性、迁就性的制度规范。中国传统复仇与现代法治存在矛盾,报复刑与报应说的法律观念在现代刑法理论中重新审视,复仇强烈情感也在法律对复仇的绝对限制中被抑制,而归根结底是传统人治进于现代法治产生的矛盾。这些传统复仇与现代法治矛盾是历史演进、古今转型的问题,应当进行平衡。首先是法律与伦理的平衡,立法上应区别亲伦情感复仇的情形与一般伤害杀人行为,司法上也应针对复仇情节予以相应的情境化审视,注重在个案判决中实现仇怨化解的公正。其次是复仇与宽恕的平衡,制度设计上回应复仇行为的合理性,综合运用恰当方式最大限度地弥补被害者亲属所受到的伤害,以减少复仇案件的发生。建立起合理、公正的法制与对待仇恨犯罪时的宽容,推进法治教育养成民众之间的宽恕,使之在自身及亲属权益遭受侵害时积极寻求合法合理的方式解决。最后,还应构建共同行为规则,舒缓公权力机构与社会公众的隔阂状态,通过引导公众、走向公众,公检法机构主动建设,搭建良好友善的与社会公众沟通交流的桥梁。正视中国自身的特殊问题与本土资源,将法治化进程中传统复仇制度的阻力化为助力,使国家的大传统与民间小传统趋于和谐,可为日后类似复仇等一系列情法难题的解决提供借鉴,建构现代法治与传统文化互有照应的共生图景。

Abstract

The Chinese traditional humanity, justice and morality are very important to Li-Fa system and still have great influence on today’s society. In modern legal system, there are some circumstances that some legal regulations or judicial practice seriously conflicts with traditional morality, the recently well-known case of Zhang Koukou is a typical case. This paper takes Zhang Koukou case as an example, aiming at Chinese traditional concept of revenge and its system and rule to explore the contradiction arising from tradition revenge system and the present-day rule of law. The Chinese traditional revenge system was strongly supported by Confucianism and it was composed of Confucian classics regulations and legal rules and had a set of specific and tedious regulations to make the revenge reasonable. Confucian classics established the tradition concept of revenge, which restricted the premise, the target, and the subject of the revenge and required the revenge result should be life for life. Separating from the Confucian classics, the legal rules and regulations relating to revenge were gradually formed. The law of the country was generally in a status to prohibit the revenge, but under the domination of Confucian concept of revenge the specific case must be balanced, and the revenge became a conflict between Li and Fa. In relation to traditional concept of revenge, the divorce system of “Yi Jue”, the rule that “if one murdered a people, once he was pardoned, he should move to another place”, the prohibition of private settlement on murder case, the regulations of restriction of revenge disposition, were all in the legal system belonged to preventive and compromised system regulations. The Chinese traditional revenge conflicts with the modern rule of law, the legal concept of revenge punishment and retribution theory are reexamined in the theory of modern criminal law theory, the strong emotions of revenge are controlled by the absolute restriction conducted by law to revenge, which can be attributed to the conflict between the traditional rule of man and the modern rule of law. All these conflicts between traditional revenge and modern rule of law are the problems from historical evolution and the transformation from ancient to modern, it should be balanced. Firstly, it should balance the law and the morals, in the legislation, the revenge conducted by relatives and the common assault and murder behavior should be distinguished, judicially the revenge circumstances should be given the corresponding consideration, and the attention should be paid to specific case that its judgment could resolve the hatred and achieve the justice. Secondly, it should balance the revenge and forgiveness, the design of system should give response to the rationality of revenge behavior, to comprehensively use the proper way to maximize the compensation to the family of the victim for the hurt they suffered so that to reduce the revenge cases. The reasonable and justice legal regulations and the forgiveness to the hatred should be established, the legal education should be promoted and the forgiveness of the masses should be trained, which would lead one to actively pursue lawful and reasonable way to solve problem if the rights and interests of his relatives were harmed. Lastly, the common code of conduct should be established to relieve the intense and estranged state between the public authority and the masses, by the way of leading the masses, moving towards the masses, the organizations of public security, the procuratorate and the court forwardly pushing forward, the communication bridge connecting the public authority and the masses can be built. Face our Chinese special problems and make use of our local resources, the obstruction coming from traditional revenge system can be converted helpful in the process of rule of law, which will make country’s great tradition in harmony with folk little tradition and provide reference for the possible similar revenge problems in the future. The prospect of the modern rule of law and the traditional culture mutually reflect each other will be expected.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 霍存福, "中国人法律观念的文化解说" (2005), 吉林人民出版社
  2. 吕思勉, "吕思勉读史札记" (1982), 上海古籍出版社
  3. 瞿同祖, "中国法律与中国社会" (1981), 中华书局
  4. 杨鸿烈, "中国法律思想史下册" (1987), 中国台湾商务印书馆
  5. 黄源盛, "中国法史导论" (2014), 广西师范大学出版社
  6. 张鹭, "案中隐性社会结构对司法裁判的影响及其调和——以张扣扣案为素材的实证分析", 甘肃政法学院学报, (2), pp.52~ (2020)
  7. 高明, "复仇与法律——兼评张扣扣案", 哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报, (2), pp.56~ (2020)
  8. 蒋海松, "张扣扣除夕复仇案需彻底反思", 人民之友, (Z1), pp.61~ (2018)
  9. 肖群忠, "论中华传统美德的当代地位与作用——兼论传统美德与社会主义道德的关系", 中国特色社会主义研究, (1), pp.63~ (2021)
  10. 岳淑珍, "伍子胥列传的复仇意识及其内涵", 河南大学学报(社会科学版), (6), pp.32~ (2002)
  11. 赵秉志, "中国古代死刑观念论要", 南都学坛(人文社会科学学报), (1), pp.93~ (2008)
  12. 张玉光, "儒家孝义思想对传统中国国家司法主义的影响——以“复仇”制度为论域的思考", 西南政法大学学报, (5), pp.23~ (2004)
  13. 王文华, "法外复仇”传统与“仇恨犯罪”的抗制——以中国传统复仇文化为视角", 法学论坛, (6), pp.56~58 (2011)
  14. 苏力, "复仇与法律—以《赵氏孤儿》为例", 法学研究, (1), pp.59~61 (2005)
  15. 蒋楠楠, "法律与伦理之间:传统中国复仇行为的正当性及限度", 法学评论, (4), pp.72~ (2018)
  16. 王勇, "超越复仇: 公众舆论、 法院与死刑的司法控制", 吉林大学社会科学学报, (4), pp.73~76 (2015)
  17. 梁根林, "公众认同、 政治抉择与死刑控制", 法学研究, (4), pp.24~ (2004)
  18. "张扣扣案公诉意见书:检方否认其杀人动机是报仇"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)