본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

문헌고찰을 통한 물리적 도구와 가상도구의 사용이 과학 개념학습에 미치는 시사점

Implications of Using Physical and Virtual Tools in Learning Science Concepts from a Literature Review

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

물리적 도구와 가상도구가 가진 서로 다른 도구적 특성은 사용자의 지식획득과 개념 이해에 있어 각기 다른 기제로 작용하여 학습에 영향을 미친다고 알려져 왔다. 본 개관연구는 문헌고찰을 통해 물리적 도구와 가상도구의 사용을 통한 학습과정을 도구가 부여하는 행동유도성의 관점과 인지적 개입의 깊이에 따른 관점에서 정리하였다. 또한 이를 바탕으로 기존에 수행된 물리적 도구와 가상도구의 사용을 통한 학습수행 정도를 비교한 연구의 결과들을 재해석하였다. 비록 물리적 도구와 가상도구의 사용에 있어 각기 다른 행동유도성이 관여되긴 하지만 실제 학습에 영향을 미치는 요인은 가상도구를 사용하느냐 혹은 물리적 도구를 사용하느냐가 아니라, 도구가 제공하는 새롭고 부가적인 정보의 양과 학습자가 도구를 이용한 다양한 학습활동을 통해 개념을 이해하는 과정에서 발생하는 인지적 개입의 깊이에 달려 있음을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 교사들이 물리적 및 가상도구를 사용하여 학생들의 개념 이해를 돕기 위한 학습 시 행동유도성과 인지적 개입의 관점에서 수업 계획을 세울 때 고려해야 할 시사점을 제시하였다.

Abstract

It has been known that the tool characteristics embedded in physical tools and virtual tools act with different underlying mechanisms in a user's knowledge acquisition and conceptual understanding. This overview study examines the learning process through the use of physical and virtual tools from the perspective of conceptual frameworks, affordability that tools present, and the depth of cognitive engagement that occurs in the process of learning concepts through various learning activities. Based on the conceptual frameworks, the results of previous comparative studies were reinterpreted. It was found that what mattered for learning is the amount of new information that a tool provides and the different level of cognitive engagement that students use through various learning activities. Finally, the implications to be considered when teachers use physical and virtual tools to help students better understand various concepts are discussed.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. Akpan, I. J., "A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of virtual reality, 3D visualization and 2D visual interactive simulation : An exploratory meta-analysis", Simulation, 95(2), pp.145~170 (2019)
  2. Anderson, J. R., "Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. Broadway" (2020), Worth Publishers
  3. Bara, F., "The visuo-haptic and haptic exploration of letters increases the kindergarten-children’s understanding of the alphabetic principle", Cognitive Development, 19(3), pp.433~449 (2004)
  4. Baxter, G. P., "Using computer simulations to assess hands-on science learning", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, pp.21~27 (1995)
  5. Borghi, A. M., "Object concepts and action : Extracting affordances from objects parts", Acta Psychologica, 115(1), pp.69~96 (2004)
  6. Borghi, A. M., "Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances", Brain Research, 1253, pp.117~128 (2009)
  7. Braun, M. W., "Improved learning efficiency and increased student collaboration through use of virtual microscopy in the teaching of human pathology", Anatomical Sciences Education, 1(6), pp.240~246 (2008)
  8. Brinson, J. R., "Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional(virtual and remote)versus traditional(hands-on)laboratories : A review of the empirical research", Computers & Education, 87, pp.218~237 (2015)
  9. Bub, D. N., "Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words", Cognition, 106, pp.27~58 (2008)
  10. Buxbaum, L. J., "Ideomotor aApraxia : A call to action", Neurocase, 7, pp.445~448 (2001)
  11. Chen, S., "A comparison of students’ approaches to inquiry, conceptual learning, and attitudes in simulation-based and microcomputer based laboratories", Science Education, 98(5), pp.905~935 (2014)
  12. Chi, M. T. H., "Why students learn more from dialogue than monologue videos : Analyses of peer interactions", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26, pp.10~50 (2017)
  13. Chi, M. T. H., "The ICAP framework : Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes", Educational Psychologist, 49, pp.219~243 (2014)
  14. Choi, O., "A study on the effects of the virtual lab and the real experimental activity in the lesson of ‘Digestion’ of the 7th grade students", Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 8(3), pp.437~451 (2004)
  15. Clark, R. E., "Media will never influence learning", Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, pp.21~29 (1994)
  16. Collier, L., "Optical versus virtual : teaching assistant perceptions of the use of virtual microscopy in an undergraduate human anatomy course", Anatomical Sciences Education, 5, pp.10~19 (2012)
  17. Corter, J. E., "Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories", Computers & Education, 57, pp.2054~2067 (2011)
  18. Darrah, M., "Are virtual labs as effective as hands-on labs for undergraduate physics?. A comparative study at two major universities", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, pp.803~814 (2014)
  19. Ekwueme, C. O., "The impact of hands-on-approach on student academic performance in basic science and mathematics", Higher Education Studies, 5(6), pp.47~51 (2015)
  20. Finkelstein, N., "When learning about the real world is better done virtually : A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment", Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 1(1), pp.010103~ (2005)
  21. Flowers, L. O., "Investigating the effectiveness of virtual laboratories in an undergraduate biology course", The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 7, pp.110~116 (2011)
  22. Garner, L. C., "Field trips and their effect on student achievement and attitudes : A comparison of physical versus virtual field trips to the Indian River Lagoon", Journal of College Science Teaching, 34, pp.14~17 (2005)
  23. Gibson, J. J., "Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology", pp.67~82 (1977), Erlbaum
  24. Glenberg, A. M., "Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI", Instructional Science, 39, pp.27~39 (2011)
  25. Han, I., "Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics", Computers & Education, 57, pp.2281~2290 (2011)
  26. Hawkins, I., "Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry?", Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, pp.516~523 (2013)
  27. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., "Focusing on function : Thinking below the surface of complex natural systems", Science Scope, 31, pp.27~35 (2008)
  28. Jaakkola, T., "Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, pp.271~283 (2008)
  29. Jackson, S., "Making system dynamics modeling accessible to pre-college science students", Interactive Learning Environments, 4, pp.233~257 (1996)
  30. Jones, M. G., "Haptic augmentation of science instruction : Does touch matter", Science Education, 90(1), pp.111~123 (2005)
  31. 강명희, "웹 기반 과학실험 시뮬레이션의 학습성과에 대한 학습몰입과 인지적실재감의 예측력 규명", 교육정보미디어연구, 17(1), pp.39~61 (2011), 한국교육정보미디어학회
  32. Kang, S., "Not affordance, but engagement: Benefits from using a learning tool", World Education Research Association Focal Meeting & American Educational Research Association Annual Conference (2022)
  33. 김성기, "시뮬레이션 기반 과학 탐구 프로그램의 개발 및 현장 적용 가능성 탐색", 현장과학교육, 15(5), pp.423~436 (2021), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
  34. 김현정, "우리나라 과학 수업에서 이루어지는 교수법에 대한 인식 – PISA 2015 설문을 중심으로", 현장과학교육, 15(1), pp.26~36 (2021), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
  35. Klahr, D., "Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children", Journal of Science Teaching, 44, pp.183~203 (2006)
  36. Koedinger, K. R., "Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it", Science, 342, pp.935~937 (2013)
  37. Lalley, J. P., "A comparison of V-Frog© to physical frog dissection", International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), pp.189~200 (2010)
  38. Lang, J., "Comparative study of hands-on and remote physics labs for first year university level physics students", Transformative Dialogue : Teaching and Learning Journal, 6, pp.1~15 (2012)
  39. 이수아, "초등 교사들이 과학 수업에서 겪는 어려움 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.97~107 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
  40. Ma, J., "Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories : A comparative literature review", ACM Computing Survey, 38, pp.1~24 (2006)
  41. Marshall, P., "Tangibles in the balance: a discovery learning task with physical or graphical materials", TEI '10 Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, pp.153~160 (2010)
  42. Moyer-Packenham, P., "A study comparing virtual manipulatives with other instructional treatments in third-and fourth-grade classrooms", The Journal of Education, 193, pp.25~39 (2013)
  43. Myneni, L. S., "An interactive and intelligent learning system for physics education", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6, pp.228~239 (2013)
  44. National Research Council., "America's lab report : Investigations in high school science" (2006), National Academies Press
  45. "National NSTA Conference" (2013)[URL]
  46. Olympiou, G., "Blending physical and virtual manipulatives : an effort to improve students' conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation", Science Education, 96, pp.21~47 (2012)
  47. Osiurak F., "Tool use and affordance : Manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches", Psychological Review, 123, pp.534~568 (2016)
  48. 박은우, "2009개정 고등학교 과학교과서의 탐구활동 분석 -차세대 과학기준(NGSS)의 과학실천 요소 중심으로-", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(8), pp.419~438 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  49. Pellicano, A., "Affordances, adaptive tool use and grounded cognition", Frontiers in Psychology, 2, pp.53~ (2011)
  50. Pouw, W., "An embedded and embodied cognition review of instructional manipulatives", Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), pp.1~22 (2014)
  51. Predavec, M., "Evaluation of E-Rat, a computer-based rat dissection, in terms of student learning outcomes", Journal of Biological Education, 35, pp.75~80 (2001)
  52. Pyatt, K., "Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs : Attitudes, performance and access", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, pp.133~147 (2012)
  53. Ronen, M., "Simulation – a bridge between theory and reality : the case of electric circuits", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, pp.14~26 (2000)
  54. Sadler, P. M., "Visualization and representation of physical systems : Wavemaker as an aid to conceptualizing wave phenomena", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, pp.197~209 (1999)
  55. 심재호, "과학교사 전문성과 실험 연수에 대한 중등 과학 교사의 인식", 생물교육, 34(1), pp.27~37 (2006), 한국생물교육학회
  56. Snir, J., "Conceptually enhanced simulations : A computer tool for science teaching", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, pp.373~388 (1993)
  57. Stoll, C. R. T., "The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews", Research synthesis methods, 10(4), pp.539~545 (2019)
  58. Virk, S., "Digital games as multirepresentational environments for science learning : Implications for theory, research, and design", Educational Psychologist, 50, pp.284~312 (2015)
  59. Weinstein, Y., "Teaching the science of learning", Cognitive Research : Principles and Implication, 3, pp.2~ (2018)
  60. Wiebe, E. N., "Haptic feedback and students’ learning about levers : Unraveling the effect of simulated touch", Computers & Education, 53(3), pp.667~676 (2009)
  61. Williams, R. L., "Haptics-Augmented Simple-Machine Educational Tools", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, pp.1~12 (2003)
  62. Winn, W., "Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, pp.25~42 (2006)
  63. Yu, S., "Effects of chemistry inquiry learning program using cyber laboratories and video materials", Master’s, pp.2007
  64. Zacharia, Z. C., "Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation : an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, pp.120~132 (2007)
  65. Zacharia, Z., "The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students’ conceptual understanding of physics", American Journal of Physics, 71, pp.618~629 (2003)
  66. Zacharia, Z., "Is physicality an important aspect of learning through science experimentation among kindergarten students?", Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, pp.447~457 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)