본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Predicting Fractures Using Vertebral 18F-NaF Uptake in Prostate Cancer Patients

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정형외과학

초록

Background: Patients with prostate cancer tend to be at heightened risk for fracture due to bone metastases and treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy. Bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard for determining fracture risk in this population. However, BMD often fails to predict many osteoporotic fractures. Patients with prostate cancer also undergo 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to monitor metastases. The purpose of this study was to assess whether bone deposition, assessed by 18F-NaF uptake in 18F-NaF PET/CT, could predict incident fractures better than DXA- or CT-derived BMD in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: This study included 105 males with prostate cancer who had undergone full body 18F-NaF PET/CT. Standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax) and CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU), a correlate of BMD, were recorded for each vertebral body. The average SUVmean, SUVmax, and HU were calculated for cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral areas. The t-test was used to assess significant differences between fracture and no-fracture groups. Results: The SUVmean and SUVmax values for the thoracic area were lower in the fracture group than in the no-fracture group. There was no significant difference in cervical, thoracic, lumbar or sacral HU between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our study reports that lower PET-derived non-metastatic bone deposition in the thoracic spine is correlated with incidence of fractures in patients with prostate cancer. CT-derived HU, a correlate of DXA-derived BMD, was not predictive of fracture risk. 18F-NaF PET/CT may provide important insight into bone quality and fracture risk.

Abstract

Background: Patients with prostate cancer tend to be at heightened risk for fracture due to bone metastases and treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy. Bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard for determining fracture risk in this population. However, BMD often fails to predict many osteoporotic fractures. Patients with prostate cancer also undergo 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to monitor metastases. The purpose of this study was to assess whether bone deposition, assessed by 18F-NaF uptake in 18F-NaF PET/CT, could predict incident fractures better than DXA- or CT-derived BMD in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: This study included 105 males with prostate cancer who had undergone full body 18F-NaF PET/CT. Standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax) and CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU), a correlate of BMD, were recorded for each vertebral body. The average SUVmean, SUVmax, and HU were calculated for cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral areas. The t-test was used to assess significant differences between fracture and no-fracture groups. Results: The SUVmean and SUVmax values for the thoracic area were lower in the fracture group than in the no-fracture group. There was no significant difference in cervical, thoracic, lumbar or sacral HU between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our study reports that lower PET-derived non-metastatic bone deposition in the thoracic spine is correlated with incidence of fractures in patients with prostate cancer. CT-derived HU, a correlate of DXA-derived BMD, was not predictive of fracture risk. 18F-NaF PET/CT may provide important insight into bone quality and fracture risk.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Chang CH, "Lumbar bone mineral density in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases", Endocr Res, 29, pp.177~182 (2003)[DOI]
  2. Coleman RE, "Bone metastases", Nat Rev Dis Primers, 6, pp.83~ (2020)[DOI]
  3. Hussain A, "Bone health effects of androgen-deprivation therapy and androgen receptor inhibitors in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer", Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 24, pp.290~300 (2021)[DOI]
  4. Tuck SP, "Prostate cancer and fracture : Identifying at-risk groups", J Clin Densitom, 20, pp.196~197 (2017)[DOI]
  5. Wallander M, "Patients with prostate cancer and androgen deprivation therapy have increased risk of fractures-a study from the fractures and fall injuries in the elderly cohort(FRAILCO)", Osteoporos Int, 30, pp.115~125 (2019)[DOI]
  6. Rizzoli R, "Cancer-associated bone disease", Osteoporos Int, 24, pp.2929~2953 (2013)[DOI]
  7. Zhang J, "Computerized tomography(CT)updates and challenges in diagnosis of bone metastases during prostate cancer", Curr Med Imaging, 16, pp.565~571 (2020)[DOI]
  8. Hardcastle N, "NaF PET", CT for response assessment of prostate cancer bone metastases treated with single fraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy, 2019, pp.14, 164~
  9. Erik M. Velez, "Treatment Response Assessment of Skeletal Metastases in Prostate Cancer with 18F-NaF PET", CT, 2019, pp.53(4), 247~252[DOI]
  10. Kyriakopoulos CE, "Exploring spatial-temporal changes in(18)F-sodium fluoride PET", CT and circulating tumor cells in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide, 2020, pp.38, 3662~3671
  11. Weisman AJ, "Quantification of bone flare on(18)F-NaF PET", CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, 2019, pp.22, 324~330
  12. -fluoride PET for monitoring bone remodeling in patients with orthopedic conditions treated with a Taylor spatial frame, "Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging", 2017, 441~448, https:
  13. Lundblad H, "Can Na(18)F PET", CT bone scans help when deciding if early intervention is needed in patients being treated with a TSF attached to the tibia : insights from 41 patients, 2021, pp.31, 349~364
  14. Lundblad H, "Can spatiotemporal fluoride ((18)F(-)) uptake be used to assess bone formation in the tibia? A longitudinal study using PET", CT, 2017, pp.475, 1486~1498
  15. sodium fluoride PET, "CT", Quant Imaging Med Surg, 8, pp.47~59 (2018)[DOI]
  16. Rhodes S, "Assessment of femoral neck bone metabolism using(18)F-sodium fluoride PET", CT imaging, 2020, pp.136, 115351~
  17. Rajapakse CS, "Influence of bone lesion location on femoral bone strength assessed by MRI-based finite-element modeling", Bone, 122, pp.209~217 (2019)[DOI]
  18. Oldan JD, "(18)F sodium fluoride PET", CT in patients with prostate cancer: quantification of normal tissues, benign degenerative lesions, and malignant lesions, 2016, pp.15, 102~108
  19. Siddique M, "The precision and sensitivity of(18)F-fluoride PET for measuring regional bone metabolism : a comparison of quantification methods", J Nucl Med, 52, pp.1748~1755 (2011)[DOI]
  20. Brenner W, "Comparison of different quantitative approaches to 18F-fluoride PET scans", J Nucl Med, 45, pp.1493~1500 (2004)
  21. Puri T, "Comparison of six quantitative methods for the measurement of bone turnover at the hip and lumbar spine using 18F-fluoride PET-CT", Nucl Med Commun, 33, pp.597~606 (2012)[DOI]
  22. Schreiber JJ, "Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength : a tool for osteoporosis management", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, pp.1057~1063 (2011)[DOI]
  23. Gausden EB, "Opportunistic use of CT imaging for osteoporosis screening and bone density assessment : a qualitative systematic review", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 99, pp.1580~1590 (2017)[DOI]
  24. Sungjoon Lee, "Correlation between Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Hounsfield Units Measured by Diagnostic CT in Lumbar Spine", 대한신경외과학회지, 54(5), pp.384~389 (2013), 대한신경외과학회
  25. Romme EA, "Bone attenuation on routine chest CT correlates with bone mineral density on DXA in patients with COPD", J Bone Miner Res, 27, pp.2338~2343 (2012)[DOI]
  26. Shahinian VB, "Risk of fracture after androgen deprivation for prostate cancer", N Engl J Med, 352, pp.154~164 (2005)[DOI]
  27. Soares CBG, "Pathological fracture after radiotherapy : systematic review of literature", Rev Assoc Med Bras(1992), 65, pp.902~908 (2019)[DOI]
  28. Patel U, "Clinical profile of acute vertebral compression fractures in osteoporosis", Br J Rheumatol, 30, pp.418~421 (1991)[DOI]
  29. Amelot A, "Approaching spinal metastases spread profile", Surg Oncol, 31, pp.61~66 (2019)[DOI]
  30. Wang C, "Study on the distribution features of bone metastases in prostate cancer", Nucl Med Commun, 33, pp.379~383 (2012)[DOI]
  31. Tzolos E, "(18)F-sodium fluoride((18)F-NaF)for imaging microcalcification activity in the cardiovascular system", Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 40, pp.1620~1626 (2020)[DOI]
  32. Sorci O, "(18)F-sodium fluoride PET", CT provides prognostic clarity compared to calcium and Framingham risk scoring when addressing whole-heart arterial calcification, 2020, pp.47, 1678~1687

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)