플랫폼제공자 P2P 보험모델의 법적 성격에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Legal Nature of Platform Provider P2P Insurance Model
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
인슈어테크의 발전과 함께 해외에서 P2P 보험이 확산하고 있다. P2P 보험이란 소비자 스스로 위험단체를 구성하고 자체적으로 위험을 부담하되, 보험기간 만료시 지급보험금을 제외한 잔액이 남는 경우 소비자에게 환급하는 제도로 정의할 수 있다. P2P 보험의 유형에는 보험중개업자 모델, 보험회사 모델, 플랫폼제공자 모델이 있으며, 특히 보험회사가 개입하지 않고 위험단체 내부적으로 위험을 전면적으로 분담하는 플랫폼제공자 모델을 중심으로 보험원리 측면의 개념요소 구비 여부를 검토할 필요가 있다. 보험 개념에 관한 기능적 접근방식에 의하면 실질적인 위험의 전가･분산이 있다면 보험성을 갖춘 것으로 보고, 또한 판례에 의하면 엄격한 대수의 법칙 적용은 보험제도의 필수 요소는 아니다. 이러한 점을 고려하면 플랫폼제공자 모델의 보험성은 부인되지 않는다. P2P 보험의 보험성을 전제로 계속 검토하면, 상호부조라는 배경, 공동체적 자치주의, 잉여금의 재분배, 비영리성 등을 고려할 때 상호보험과 유사하다. 따라서 동 모델의 P2P 보험은 상호보험 또는 그에 준한 계약으로서, 상법 제664조에 의해 그 성질에 반하지 않는 범위에서 상법 보험편이 준용될 수 있다. 본 연구는 P2P 보험이라는 새로운 경제적 현상의 법률적 성격을 규명하고자 하였다. 그런데 IT 기술의 극단적 발전으로 현대적 보험제도가 오히려 보험의 원시형태인 상호보험의 모습으로 회귀하는 역설적 의미는 시사하는 바가 크다. 한편, P2P 보험 유형에 따라 전통적 법리를 그대로 적용하기 어려운 문제가 발생할 수 있는데, 향후 국내 도입의 구체화와 함께 다양한 법적 쟁점들에 대한 검토가 계속 수반되어야 할 것이다.
Abstract
P2P insurance is an insurance system in which consumers(peer to peer) form an insurance group on their own and bear the risk of a certain amount of loss, but when the insurance period expires, the balance excluding insurance payments is refunded by the consumer’s designation. Although it has not yet been fully introduced in Korea, it is developing into various types in overseas, such as an intermediary model, an insurer model, and a platform provider model. Even though their appearances are different, if the common concept elements are extracted, the organization of risk groups led by insurance consumers, the absence of risk transfer to insurance companies, autonomy of the operation of risk groups, and insurance premiums are refunded when insurance expires. In order to introduce P2P insurance as a new insurance system, it is problematic how it can be covered under the existing insurance law. In particular, it is necessary to review whether it conforms to the definition of insurance and conceptual elements in terms of insurance principles. In this regard, discussions were conducted focusing on the platform provider model, which is the most advanced form of allocating risks internally to members of risk groups without any external insurers intervening. According to the functional approach to the concept of insurance, even if there is no insurance company like the P2P insurance of the platform provider model, if a certain size of subscribers is gathered and the function of actual risk transfer/distribution is performed, it is considered to have the essence of insurance. In addition, since the court does not view the calculation of premiums according to the law of large numbers strictly as an indispensable element of insurance, even if P2P insurance is based on a small risk group, the nature of insurance should not be denied because of its size. As such, the P2P insurance of the platform provider model has the nature of insurance in terms of insurance principle, and it has a similarity to the traditional mutual insurance in consideration of the background of mutual aid, communal autonomy, redistribution of surplus, and non-profit. Therefore, the platform provider model of the P2P insurance is mutual insurance or a contract equivalent thereto, and according to Article 664 of the Commercial Act, the provisions of the Commercial Act insurance section can be applied mutatis mutandis. This study attempted to clarify the legal nature of a new economic phenomenon called P2P insurance, a new insurance system that was still before its introduction in South Korea. However, the paradoxical meaning of the modern insurance system returning to the form of mutual insurance, which is the root form of insurance due to the 4th industrial revolution and extreme development of IT technology, needs to be considered at this time. The three types of P2P insurance differ in detail, but in a large framework, the role of the existing insurer is reduced and the role of policyholders increases. Therefore, there is a problem that the traditional legal principles on insurance cannot be applied consistently, and a review of various legal issues should be accompanied with the concrete introduction in the future.
참고문헌 (71)
- 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
- 김은경, "보험계약법" (2016), 보험연수원
- 김홍기, "상법강의" (2020), 박영사
- 박세민, "보험법" (2017), 박영사
- 양승규, "보험법" (2004), 삼지원
- 유주선, "보험법" (2018), 씨아이알
- 이기수, "보험 해상법" (2015), 박영사
- 장덕조, "보험법" (2020), 법문사
- 정동윤, "주석 상법 보험(Ⅰ)" (2015), 한국사법행정학회
- 최기원, "보험법" (1998), 박영사
- 한기정, "보험법" (2017), 박영사
- P2P보험의 특징 및 활용사례, "김규동", 보험연구원, ~, pp.KiRi Report , 442호 (2018)
- 김동훈, "상호보험에 관한 일고찰", 외법논집, 3 (1996), 한국외대 법학연구소
- 김성태, "보험개념의 구성요소", 보험학회지, 37 (1991), 한국보험학회
- 김인현, "韓國과 美國의 船主責任相互保險에서의 直接請求權에 대한 比較法的 硏究― 선지급규정을 중심으로 ―", 한국해법학회지, 28(1), pp.7~42 (2006), 한국해법학회
- 김화중, "인슈어테크와 법적 쟁점 – P2P 보험의 출현과 제도적 시사점을 중심으로-", Yonsei Global Business Law Review, 11(2) (2019), 연세대 글로벌 비즈니스와 법센터
- 인슈어테크 혁명: 현황 점검 및 과제 고찰, "박소정", 보험연구원, ~, pp.보험연구원 연구보고서 권호 17-11
- 박영준, "P&I 보험의 법적 성질", 보험법연구, 7(1) (2013), 한국보험법학회
- 우성만, "해상 보험법에 관한 제문제, 下" (1991), 법원행정처
- 유주선, "보험 판매채널의 변화와 신채널 발전방안에 관한 법적 연구", 보험법연구, 14(3), pp.3~28 (2020), (사)한국보험법학회
- 이현열, "보험단체론 -보험의 본질을 중심으로-", 보험학회지, (103), pp.1~51 (2015), 한국보험학회[DOI]
- 전우현, "생명보험 주식회사와 생명보험 상호회사의 법리비교", 영남법학, 11(1) (2005), 영남대 법학연구소
- 최병규, "전동킥보드의 자동차해당여부에 대한 고찰", 재산법연구, 36(1), pp.207~230 (2019), 한국재산법학회[DOI]
- 한기정, "상호보험 공제 우체국보험의 적용법규에 대한 고찰", 보험법연구, 2(1) (2008), 한국보험법학회
- 금융위원회, "핀테크 활성화를 위한 규제혁신 추진방안", ~ (2019)
- 금융위원회, "2020년 금융산업 혁신추진계획", ~ (2020)
- 금융위원회, "보험업법 시행령 개정안 입법예고(2.5.~3.17.) -소액단기전문 보험업을 도입하고, 헬스케어 활성화 등 보험산업의 디지털 전환을 촉진하겠습니다-", ~ (2021)
- 江頭憲治郎, "⽝商取引法⽞" (2013), 弘文堂
- 吉澤卓哉, "保険の仕組み" (2006), 千倉書房
- Abraham, Kenneth S., "Cases and Materials, Insurance Law and Regulation" (2015), Foundation Press
- Birds, John, "MacGillivray on Insurance Law" (2015), Thomson Reuters
- Dreher, Meinrad, "Die Versicherung als Rechtsprodukt. Die Privatversicherung und ihre rechtliche Gestaltung" (1991), Mohr Siebeck
- Jerry, Robert H. Ⅱ, "Understanding Insurance Law" (2012), LexisNexis
- McGurk, Brendan, "Data Profiling and Insurance Law" (2019), Hart Publishing
- Wilson, Jay D. Jr, "Creating strategic value through financial technology" (2017), Wiley
- 藤原総一郎, "⽝イノベーションと法⽞勉強会提言", 規制改革推進会議・16回投資等ワー キング・グループ資料 (2018)
- 吉田和央, "InsurTech（インシュアテック）の本質と法的諸問題についての試論-保険版 Fintechの可能性-", 金融法務事情, (2061) (2017)
- 吉澤卓哉, "P2P保険の保険該当性", 保険学雑誌, (644) (2019), 日本保險學會
- 井上俊剛, "Fintech 革命が保険監督，保険業界に与える影響", 保険学雑誌, (640) (2018), 日本 保險學會
- 岡田豊基, "保険本質論の法的再検討", 神戸学院法学, 25(1995) (1995)
- 内田真穂, "保険事業におけるブロックチェーン技術の活用~発展の方向性と課題~", 保ジャパン日本興亜総研レポート, (72) (2018)
- 牛窪賢一, "インシュアテックの進展", 損保総研レポート, (124) (2018)
- 松崎良, "保険契約法における共済の位置付け", 保険学雑誌, (612) (2011), 日本保險學會
- 諸外国の保険業におけるインターネットやモバイル端末の活 用状況について, "損害保険事業総合研究所", ~ (2015)
- Banham, Russ, "peer pressure", Risk Management, 64(2) (2017)
- Clemente, Gian Paolo, "The broker model for peer‑to‑peer insurance: an analysis of its value", The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice (2020)
- Denuit, Michel, "Investing in your own and peers’ risk : The simple analytics of P2P Insurance" (2019), UCLouvain
- Denuit, Michel, "Size-biased transform and conditional mean risk sharing, with application to p2p insurance and tontines", ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 49(3) (2019), Cambridge University Press
- Gao, P., "Star: Semiring trust inference for trust-aware social recommenders", Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (2016)
- Liou, JH., "Design of a Social-Based Recommendation Mechanism for Peer-to-Peer Insurance", Business Information Systems Workshops (2019)
- Marano, Pierpaolo, "Navigating InsurTech : The digital intermediaries of insurance products and customer protection in the EU", Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 26(2) (2019)
- O'Rourke, Morgan, "My friend, my insurer", Risk Management, 64(2) (2017), Risk Management Society Publishing, Inc
- Rego, Margarida Lima, "InsurTech: A Legal and Regulatory View" (2019), Springer International Publishing
- Chang H-L and Shaw MJ. Transformation of the Transaction Cost and the Agency Cost in an Organization and the Applicability of Blockchain—A Case Study of Peer-to-Peer Insurance, "Sun R-T", Frontiers in Blockchain, ~ (2020)
- Talonen, Antti, "Systematic literature review of research on mutual insurance companies", Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management (2016), Elsevier Ltd
- "Peer-to-Peer Multi-Risk Insurance and Mutual Aid"[URL]
- "少額短期保険業者のjustInCase, P2P保険のサンドボックス認定を取得"[URL]
- Report on best practice on licensing requirements, peer to peer insurance and the principle of proportionality in an insurtech context, "EIOPA", ~
- "Enjoying a cool discussion of InsurTech carrier Lemonade, not too sweet, not too sour"[URL]
- "insPeer – France’s first P2P Insurance Service"[URL]
- "Introducing the Third Wave of Peer-to-Peer Insurance"[URL]
- "Insurance in Today’s Sharing Economy: The IDD Impact"[URL]
- Technology and innovation in the insurance sector, "OECD", ~ (2017)
- "Teambrella: A Peer to Peer Insurance System" (2016)[URL]
- "Peer to Peer Insurance Market - Forecast(2020–2025)"[URL]
- "Peer-to-peer(P2P) Insurance"[URL]
- "Peer-to-peer insurance. Presented at the Insurance and Technology Event organized by the Center for Insurance Policy and Research in New Orleans, Louisiana"[URL]
- "Mutual insurance in the 21st century: back to the future?"[URL]
- "There’s An Inherent Conflict Of Interest At The Heart Of The Insurance Business Model"[URL]
- "Top P2P Insurance. Startups"[URL]
- How technology can make insurance more inclusive, "World Bank Group", Finance, Competitiveness&Innovation Global Practice(Fintech, ~ (2018)