이윤택 <햄릿>과 <문제적 인간 연산>의 셰익스피어 각색의 상이성과 현대성
Difference & Modernity of Lee YounTaek’s Adaptation of Shakespeare’s Works in Hamlet and MunJeInGan YeonSan
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Lee YoonTaek can be regarded as the representative playwright and director of Korea in adapting Shakespeare’s works with Korean traditional style. He, in his plays and performances, has tried to restore traditional theatre by connecting Shakespeare works with Gut and traditional entertainments. Lee YounTaek has supported Oh TaeSuk’s theatrical movement of “Korean Racial Theatre” by announcing that Korean theatre should restore the ‘Koreanness’ in producing performances on the stage. This ‘Koreanness’ means the original emotion, rhythm and movement of Koreans on the theatrical performance. This means his positive attitude of agreement, inheritance and cooperation for Oh TaeSuk’s theatrical movement. Lee YounTaek has continued to experiment in adapting Shakespeare’s Hamlet in his own style of direction by means of ‘Gut.’ He introduces supernatural ‘inspiration’ of Gut in several scenes to cure madness or psychological instability, which can create the uniqueness of his theatrical world. And he tries to overcome the nihilistic result of the last scene in Shakespeare’s original works in which most of major characters should die without any vision of salvation. Instead, Lee lets Hamlet rise to heaven by tearing white textile ritually, the symbol of death, after his death as the scapegoat for the purgation of the world. The audience can feel successful exorcisement of skillful Gut by watching Hamlet’s role as a Korean shaman(Mudang) in the last scene. Lee endeavors to use his dialectical method in connecting the tradition and the modern, the Oriental and the Western, and Shakespeare and the traditional Gut. By doing so, Lee is able to produce the synthesis from the mixture of two different elements in his performance of MunJeInGan YeonSan. He inserts a lot of motifs of Shakespeare works such as Hamlet and Macbeth. Different from Hamlet, MunJeInGan YeonSan is composed of historical anecdotes of King YeonSan which reminds us of similar motifs of Hamlet and Macbeth. YeonSan, by using Guts, tries to solve his mother’s regrets by which she could not leave for the world of death. Accordingly, the audience can enjoy opposite elements simultaneously, which can create the synthesis in theatrical effects dialectically. Also, Lee describes YeonSan as extremely decadent character who searches for murder and sexuality to the limit without any vision of salvation. YeonSan’s nihilistic attitude in contrast with Hamlet’s positive one, can be said to create modernity by showing destructive ending in spite of its major structure of traditional Gut.
Abstract
Lee YoonTaek can be regarded as the representative playwright and director of Korea in adapting Shakespeare’s works with Korean traditional style. He, in his plays and performances, has tried to restore traditional theatre by connecting Shakespeare works with Gut and traditional entertainments. Lee YounTaek has supported Oh TaeSuk’s theatrical movement of “Korean Racial Theatre” by announcing that Korean theatre should restore the ‘Koreanness’ in producing performances on the stage. This ‘Koreanness’ means the original emotion, rhythm and movement of Koreans on the theatrical performance. This means his positive attitude of agreement, inheritance and cooperation for Oh TaeSuk’s theatrical movement. Lee YounTaek has continued to experiment in adapting Shakespeare’s Hamlet in his own style of direction by means of ‘Gut.’ He introduces supernatural ‘inspiration’ of Gut in several scenes to cure madness or psychological instability, which can create the uniqueness of his theatrical world. And he tries to overcome the nihilistic result of the last scene in Shakespeare’s original works in which most of major characters should die without any vision of salvation. Instead, Lee lets Hamlet rise to heaven by tearing white textile ritually, the symbol of death, after his death as the scapegoat for the purgation of the world. The audience can feel successful exorcisement of skillful Gut by watching Hamlet’s role as a Korean shaman(Mudang) in the last scene. Lee endeavors to use his dialectical method in connecting the tradition and the modern, the Oriental and the Western, and Shakespeare and the traditional Gut. By doing so, Lee is able to produce the synthesis from the mixture of two different elements in his performance of MunJeInGan YeonSan. He inserts a lot of motifs of Shakespeare works such as Hamlet and Macbeth. Different from Hamlet, MunJeInGan YeonSan is composed of historical anecdotes of King YeonSan which reminds us of similar motifs of Hamlet and Macbeth. YeonSan, by using Guts, tries to solve his mother’s regrets by which she could not leave for the world of death. Accordingly, the audience can enjoy opposite elements simultaneously, which can create the synthesis in theatrical effects dialectically. Also, Lee describes YeonSan as extremely decadent character who searches for murder and sexuality to the limit without any vision of salvation. YeonSan’s nihilistic attitude in contrast with Hamlet’s positive one, can be said to create modernity by showing destructive ending in spite of its major structure of traditional Gut.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김동욱, "글로컬화로 완성된 『햄릿』: 이윤택이 연출한 『햄릿』(1996-2005) 공연 연구", Shakespeare Review, 44(4), pp.717~752 (2008), 한국셰익스피어학회[DOI]
- 김병모, "한민족의 구성", 한민족 공동체, (창간) (1993)
- 김승미, "오태석의 연극세계", 공연과 리뷰, (봄), pp.140~147 (1996)
- 김윤희, "문학 작품에 나타난 무굿의 치료적 성격 - 김동리의 「을화」, 이윤택의 『오구, 죽음의 형식』을 중심으로", 문학과 종교, 16(3), pp.23~46 (2011), 한국문학과종교학회
- 김정숙, "이윤택의 연극-위기(crisis)의 미학과 담론성", 한국연극학, 1(48), pp.225~260 (2012), 한국연극학회[DOI]
- 박정호, "중앙일보, 2000,5.2", ~ (2000)
- 백현미, "이윤택 희곡 <문제적 인간 연산>의 감정 연구 -메타드라마적 장치의 활용 양상을 중심으로-", Journal of korean Culture, 26, pp.185~212 (2014), 한국어문학국제학술포럼
- 손신형, "햄릿과 마주보다" (2010), 도요
- 송승환, "이윤택과의 인터뷰", 연극작업 20, ~
- 양혜숙, "오태석희곡집1: 백마강 달밤에" (1999), 평민사
- 엘리아데, 마르치아, "사마니즘-고대적 접신술" (1992), 까치글방
- 오태석, "오태석 연극: 실험과 도전의 40년", pp.11~18 (2002), 연극 과 인간
- 유민영, "한국현대희곡사" (1982), 홍성사
- 이강임, "이윤택민족극의 남근중심적(phallocentric)신화 해체하기", 한국연극학, (31), pp.77~133 (2007), 한국연극학회[DOI]
- 이미원, "“한국 사실주의의 희곡의 최고봉”: <산불> 분석과 주요 공연사", 한국예술연구, (10), pp.113~140 (2014), 한국예술연구소
- 이윤택, "우리극 연구소 연극총서 2, 연극작업: "햄릿읽기"" (2001), 우리극연구소
- 이윤택, "한일연극교류의 현 지점: 우리가 극복해야 할 우 가지 시각", 연극 평론, (19)통권 : 9, pp.44~56
- 이윤택, "문제적 인간 연산" (1995), 공간미디어
- 이윤택, "공연대본전집. 5권" (2006), 연극과 인간
- 이윤택, "21 세기 연극적 코드는 셰익스피어다", 경향신문, 2005.8.14, ~ (2005)
- 이윤택, "웃다, 북치다, 죽다" (1993), 평민사
- 이윤택, "무엇이 연극적인가, 무엇이 한국적인가", 공연과 리뷰, 22, pp.65~82 (1999)
- 이현우, "굿과 한국 셰익스피어 —양정웅의 <햄릿>과 오태석의 <템페스트>를 중심으로", Shakespeare Review, 49(2), pp.249~274 (2013), 한국셰익스피어학회[DOI]
- 이혜경, "세계주의자를 꿈꾸는 ‘포스트모던적 모더니스트’ -이윤택 론", 공연 과 리뷰, (가을), pp.53~64 (1995)
- 임도현, "2009 연희단거리패 이윤택의 <햄릿>-2008 엔스-다니엘 해르초크의 <테러리스트 햄릿>과 비교하면서", Review, pp.196~203 (2009)
- 임준서, "이윤택의 공연대본 6", pp.211~227 (2006), 연극과 인간
- 서연호, "오태석 연극: 실험과 도전의 40년", pp.69~218 (2002), 연극과 인간
- 조성숙, "‘어머니’라는 이데올로기" (2002), 한울아카데미
- 조흥율, "한민족의 기원과 사마니즘" (2003), 한국학술정보
- 최상민, "오태석 희곡 <태>의 모더니즘적 글쓰기 방법 고찰", 현대문학이론연구, (29), pp.381~402 (2006), 현대문학이론학회
- 한영림, "‘All the World’s Still Shakespeare’s Stage’: Youn-Taek Lee’s Rewriting of Shakespeare", Shakespeare Review, 45(4), pp.689~709 (2009), 한국셰익스피어학회[DOI]
- Kramer BH, "Psychotherapeutic of a traditional healing ceremony", The Malaysian Main Puteri Transcultural Psyictria Research Review, 7 (1970)
- Shirokogoroff, S. M., "Social Organization of the Northern Tungus" (1930), The Commercial Press Ltd
