본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Three Lear Productions in early 2000s’ Korean Cultural Landscape

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Korea’s, cultural modernization was influenced by westernization after the Korean war. Since the 1960s, Shakespeare’s plays, with their literary and theatrical fabrics, appealed to the Korean audience more than any other plays. Accordingly, Korean directors tried to prove their theatrical imagination with productions of Shakespeare. Generally speaking, they created Shakespeare productions in two different ways. One way was by appropriating the rich Korean traditional folk culture for their productions. This phenomenon was accompanied by the national cultural agenda from the late 1970s to the 1980s to recover Korean identity through traditional folk culture. Still many directors continue to use traditional folk culture in their productions, but they intend to cultivate it primarily for the theatrical style rather than for the cultural identity. Once they turned their interest to fuse the cultures, they rediscovered folk cultures as fertile theatrical resources. These days, intercultural amalgamations frequently happen frequently to in Shakespearean productions. The other way tended to destroy the original plot and to breathe in the current Korean social reality. Korean directors did not hesitate to cut the words, transpose the scenes, and subvert the original story. After they had destroyed the original plot, they often reconstructed the current issues in the scenes such as gender, sexuality, class struggle, family relationships, and so on. In these post-modern Shakespearean productions the spectacular mise-en-scenes presented Korean social reality as a force rather than representing it. This paper will survey how Shakespeare productions have developed since the late 1970s, and will focus on three recent Lear productions which that embrace tradition, modernity and post-modernity. The National Theatre’s King Uru (2001) depended on Korean folk culture for its theatrical style. Yoon-Taek Lee’s King Lear (2004) mixed a modern theatrical style and traditional folk culture. And Theatre Group Gabyun’s Family Lear (2003) destroyed the original plot and reflected current Korean social problems of such as parent-child relationships as well as the prevalent materialism. Eventually my paper will show how Shakespearean productions are corresponding to the current cultural landscape in Korea.

Abstract

Korea’s, cultural modernization was influenced by westernization after the Korean war. Since the 1960s, Shakespeare’s plays, with their literary and theatrical fabrics, appealed to the Korean audience more than any other plays. Accordingly, Korean directors tried to prove their theatrical imagination with productions of Shakespeare. Generally speaking, they created Shakespeare productions in two different ways. One way was by appropriating the rich Korean traditional folk culture for their productions. This phenomenon was accompanied by the national cultural agenda from the late 1970s to the 1980s to recover Korean identity through traditional folk culture. Still many directors continue to use traditional folk culture in their productions, but they intend to cultivate it primarily for the theatrical style rather than for the cultural identity. Once they turned their interest to fuse the cultures, they rediscovered folk cultures as fertile theatrical resources. These days, intercultural amalgamations frequently happen frequently to in Shakespearean productions. The other way tended to destroy the original plot and to breathe in the current Korean social reality. Korean directors did not hesitate to cut the words, transpose the scenes, and subvert the original story. After they had destroyed the original plot, they often reconstructed the current issues in the scenes such as gender, sexuality, class struggle, family relationships, and so on. In these post-modern Shakespearean productions the spectacular mise-en-scenes presented Korean social reality as a force rather than representing it. This paper will survey how Shakespeare productions have developed since the late 1970s, and will focus on three recent Lear productions which that embrace tradition, modernity and post-modernity. The National Theatre’s King Uru (2001) depended on Korean folk culture for its theatrical style. Yoon-Taek Lee’s King Lear (2004) mixed a modern theatrical style and traditional folk culture. And Theatre Group Gabyun’s Family Lear (2003) destroyed the original plot and reflected current Korean social problems of such as parent-child relationships as well as the prevalent materialism. Eventually my paper will show how Shakespearean productions are corresponding to the current cultural landscape in Korea.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Barucha, Rustom, "The Politics of Cultural Practice: Thinking Through Theatre in an Age of Globalization" (2000), Wesleyan UP
  2. Bristol, Michael D, "Big-Time Shakespeare" (1996), Routledge
  3. Burger, Peter, "Theory of the Avant-Garde" (1984), Minnesota UP
  4. Carlson, Marvin, "Theatrical Performance: Illustration, Translation, Fulfillment, or Supplement?", Theatre Journal, 37(1), pp.5~11 (1985)
  5. Choi, Young-Joo, "The Aspects of Intercultural Shakespearean Production centering on ‘the Third Space’ and ‘Gloc culture’", Korean Theatre Studies, 12, pp.109~143 (2004)
  6. Dollimore, Jonathan, "Political Shakespeare", pp.2~16 (1994), Manchester UP
  7. Song-Hyun-jong, "Family Lear", Aroonggoogy, ~ (2003)
  8. Greenblatt, Stephen, "Shakespearean Negotiations" (1988), Oxford UP
  9. Geis, Deborah R, "Postmodern Theatric(k)s" (1995), Michigan UP
  10. Kim, Sook-hyun, "The Directors of Drama Center" (2005), Hyundai Meehak
  11. Kott, Jan, "Shakespeare Our Contemporary" (1965), Methun
  12. Lee Mee-Won, "Korean Theatre in Postmodern Age", pp.71~106 (1996), Modern Aesthetics
  13. Lee, Yoon-Taek, "The Existence and Role of the Korean Directors", The Korean Theatre Journal, pp.44~54 (2008)
  14. Hall, Stuart, "Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory", pp.392~403 (1994), Colubia UP
  15. Fisher-Lichete, Erika, "The Intercultural Performance Reader", pp.27~40 (1996), Routledge
  16. Gilbert, Helen, "Post-Colonial Drama: Theory, Practice, Politics" (1996), Routledge
  17. Hutcheon, Linda, "A Poetics of Postmodernism" (1988), Routledge
  18. Lee Yoon-taek, "King Lear", Heaven Theatre of National Theatre, ~ (2004)
  19. Kim Myung-gon, "King Uru", Sun Rising Theatre of National Theatre, ~ (2001)
  20. Mullany, Steven, "The Place of the Stage: License, Play, and Power in Renaissance England" (1995), Michigan Up
  21. Pavis, Patrice, "Theatre at the Crossroads of Culture" (1992), Routledge
  22. Shaked, Gershon, "The Play Out of Context: Transferring Plays from Culture to Culture", pp.7~24 (1989), Cambridge Up

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)