본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

관계 성숙 모형과 SKT사례 : 지식 파트너와 함께 춤을

Relationship Maturity Model with SKT Case : Dancing with Knowledge Partners

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

In the age where the Internet changes everything, even the earth has become flat. The boarders between nations, locations, times, and industries are not meaningful, and no single company can do the whole process well. Therefore, various types of ‘Value network’ and ‘Relation web’ emerge for moving first and learning fast. Both the relationship maturity model (RMM) proposed and the partnership management initiatives at SKT demonstrate that the concept is important, and that the final goal can be reached only through a series of critical outcome at each phase. In particular, recognizing as core infrastructures various online/offline channels, deep trust, and rich communications is an important finding for a successful relationship management. Also, related literatures suggest the following key factors to be influential in more than two phases: professionalism including expertise, similarity, channel infrastructure, trustful/trustworthy, and absorptive capacity. Based on these findings, future efforts need to be put on the research & development of related measurement and management tools. It is hoped that more dance with their partners through these efforts.

Abstract

In the age where the Internet changes everything, even the earth has become flat. The boarders between nations, locations, times, and industries are not meaningful, and no single company can do the whole process well. Therefore, various types of ‘Value network’ and ‘Relation web’ emerge for moving first and learning fast. Both the relationship maturity model (RMM) proposed and the partnership management initiatives at SKT demonstrate that the concept is important, and that the final goal can be reached only through a series of critical outcome at each phase. In particular, recognizing as core infrastructures various online/offline channels, deep trust, and rich communications is an important finding for a successful relationship management. Also, related literatures suggest the following key factors to be influential in more than two phases: professionalism including expertise, similarity, channel infrastructure, trustful/trustworthy, and absorptive capacity. Based on these findings, future efforts need to be put on the research & development of related measurement and management tools. It is hoped that more dance with their partners through these efforts.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" (1994)
  2. "Developing Knowledge- Based Client Relationships: Leadership in Professional Services" (2005), Elsevier
  3. "The Role of Relationship Quality in the Stratification of Vendors as Perceived by Customers", 26(2), pp.128~142 (1998)
  4. "Tearing up the Jack Welch Playbook" (2006), Fortune
  5. "The World is Flat: a Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, Farrar, Straus and Giroux" (2005)
  6. "Withdrawal of Team Autonomy during Concurrent Engineering", 43(9), pp.1275~1287 (1997)
  7. "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price- Perceived Risk Relationship Journal of Consumer Research" (1994)
  8. "Implications for Transaction Cost Theory Academy of Management Review" (1990)
  9. "Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics", 20(2), pp.379~403 (1995)
  10. "e-Process Edge" (2000), McGrow-Hill
  11. "Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations", 29(1), pp.59~85 (2005)
  12. "Relationships in IT Outsourcing: A Stakeholder Perspective", pp.355~384 (2000), Pinnaflex Education Resources, Cincinnati, Ohio
  13. "Wellspring of Knowledge Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation" (1995), Harvard Business School Press
  14. "Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-enabled Market Knowledge Creation", 29(1), pp.145~187 (2005)
  15. "Communication Competence in the Workplace" (1982)
  16. "The Contribution of Shared Knowledge to IS Group Performance", 21(4), pp.409~429 (1996)
  17. "End-User Training Research: Status and Models for the Future", pp.129~146 (2000), Pinnaflex Education Resources, Cincinnati, Ohio
  18. "Diffusion of Innovations" (2003), The Free Press
  19. "Business Strategy in Hypercompetitive Environments: Rethinking the Logic of IT Differentiation", pp.245~261 (2000), Pinnaflex Education Resources, Cincinnati, Ohio
  20. "Shaping Agility through Partnership", 27(2), pp.237~263 (2003)
  21. "The Internet Change Everything (ICE) Age", pp.209~220 (2000), Pinnaflex Education Resources, Cincinnati, Ohio
  22. "Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm", 17, pp.27~43 (1996)
  23. "Why should I share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice", 29(1), pp.35~57 (2005)
  24. "Managing IT Infrastructure: A Strategic Choice", pp.329~353 (2000), Pinnaflex Education Resources, Cincinnati, Ohio
  25. "Relational Governance as an Inter-organizational Strategy: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust in Economic Exchange", 16, pp.373~392 (1995)
  26. "글로벌 아웃소싱 환경에서의 IS전문가의 신뢰 연구", 17, pp.13~23 (2006), 한국외국어대학교 기업경영연구소
  27. "프로페셔널의 조건" (2001), 청림출판
  28. "가상 조직내 참여 구성원들간의 신뢰수준의 결정요인과 그 효과에 대한 연구", 32(5), pp.1349~1373 (2003)
  29. "관계형성 유지에 대한 신뢰와 만족의 매개역할에 관한 연구", 6(1), pp.1~32 (2001)
  30. "조직 구성원 신뢰의 지식공유에 대한 영향 분석", 3(1), pp.19~39 (2002)
  31. "3000여 파트너사의 경쟁력이 곧 우리의 경쟁력", (495), pp.51~53 (2006), 월간전경련

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)