Dead hand poison pill의 정당성

키워드

참고문헌 (77)

1. 임홍근, "회사법" (2000), 법문사
2. 김정수, "현대증권법원론" (2002), 박영사
3. 김화진, "M&A와 경영권" (1998), 박영사
4. 이준섭, "공개수법에 관한 고찰-개정 M&A법의 성찰", 상사법연구, 18(2) (1999), 한국상사법학회
5. 김두식, "M&A법제의 개선방안연구;유럽연합의 기업인수규제-공개매수지침을 중심으로(제19권 제3호 , 2005.9)", 상장협;기업법연구, (50) (2004), 한구상장회사협의회;한국기업법학회
6. 유영일, "주식공개매수에 관한 연구-방어행위의 적법성에 관한 미국회사법상의 논의를 중심으로", D, pp.1994
7. 정쾌영, "포이즌 필의 도입에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 기업법연구, 20(2) (2006)
8. 송종준, "유가증권공개매수에 관한 연구-그 법적 규제를 중심으로", D, pp.1990
9. "M&A 법제를 둘러싼 최근의 쟁점과 과제(M&A의 법적 과제)", 2006년 한국기업법학회 한국상사판례학회 공동학술대회 자료집 (2006)
10. "M&A에 대한 주요 방어대책", 상사법연구, 14(1) (1995)
11. 양정호, "신용장거래에서의 사기관련 한미사례 검토", 기업법연구, 19(1), pp.199~222 (2005), 한국기업법학회
12. 이욱래, "적대적 M&A에 대응한 이사의 방어행위에 대한 법적 평가", BFL, (12) (2005), 서울대 금융센터
13. 노일석, "적대적 기업매수와 회사지배이론", 상사법연구, 17(1) (1998), 한국상사법학회
14. 양만식, "적대적 M&A에 있어서의 이사의 역할(이사의 행동기준)", 기업법연구, 14 (2003), 한국기업법학회
15. 박준, "적대적 M&A의 방어와 관련한 법적 규제", 인권과 정의, pp.252~ (1997), 대한 변호사협회
16. 유재원, "세계화와 개방정책: 평가와 과제" (2005), 대외경제정책연구원
17. 대한상공회의소, "M&A 방어 환경의 국제비교와 정책 시사점", ~ (2004), 정책 건의 자료
18. 송옥렬, "포이즌 필의 도입가능성-일본에서의 논의를 중심으로", BFL, (12) (2005), 서울대학교금융법센터
19. 이홍철, "상장법인의 적대적 M&A에 대한 방어행위, 증권거래에 관한 제문제", 법원도서관
20. "글로벌 M&A 시장현황과 시사점" (2009), 김화진[URL]
21. 北泥正啓, "會社法(第4版)" (1994), 靑林書院
22. 大隅健一郞, "會社法論(上卷) (第3版)" (1991), 有斐閣
23. Neff,Daniel A, "The Impact of State Statutes and Continuing Director Rights Plans", U. Miami L. Rev, 51, pp.663~ (1997)
24. Gordon, Jeffrey N, "Just Say Never? Poison Pills, Dead hand Pills, and Shareholder-Adopted Bylaws: An Essay for Warren Buffet", Cardozo L. Rev., 19, pp.511~ (1997)
25. Lese, Shawn C, "Preventing Control from the Grave: A Proposal for Judicial Treatment of Dead Hand Provisions in Poison Pills", Colum. L. Rev., 96, pp.2175~ (1996)
26. Comment, Robert, "Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrence and Wealth Effects of Modern Anti-takeover Measures", J. Fin. Econ, 39(3) (1995)
27. Easterbrook, Frank H, "The Proper Role of a Targets Management in Responding to a Tender Offer", Harv. L. Rev., 94, pp.1161~ (1981)
28. Herzel, Leo, "Why Corporate Directors Have a Right to Resist Tender Offers", Corp. L. Rev., 3, pp.7~ (1980)
29. Lynch, Gary G, "The Legitimacy of Defensive Tactics in Tender Offers", Cornell L. Rev., 64, pp.901~ (1979)
31. Roll, Richard, "The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers", J. Bus., 59, pp.197~200 (1986)
32. Marris , Robin, "The Corporation Competition and the Invisible Hand", J. Econ. Lit, 18(32) (1980)
33. Jensen, Michael C, "The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence", J. Fin. Econ, 11(5) (1983)
34. Ryngaert, Michael, "The Effect of Poison Pill Securities on Shareholder Wealth", Fin. Econ., 20, pp.377~ (1988)
35. Steinberg, Marc I, "Securities Regulation (3d ed.)" (1998)
36. Coates, John C. IV, "Takeover Defenses in the Shadow of the Poison Pill: A Critique of the Scientific Evidence", Tex. L. Rev., 79, pp.271~ (2000)
37. Jarrell, Gregg A, "Shark Repellents and Stock Prices: The Effects of Anti-takeover Amendments Since 1980", J. Fin. Econ., 19, pp.127~ (1987)
38. Klock, Mark, "Dead hand-poison catalyst or strength-enchanting megavitamin? an analysis of the benefits of managerial protection and the detriments of judicial interference", Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 67 (2001)
39. Bruck,Connie, "The Predators' Ball", 234 (1989)
40. Shleifer,Andrei, "Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers", Corporate Takeovers, 33 (1988)
41. Rodman,Heith D, "Comment: Death Toll for the Dead Hand?: The Survivability of the Dead Hand Provision in Corporate America", Emory L. J., 48, pp.991~ (1999)
42. Dewey,Thomas E. L., "Manager's Journal: Loosening the Grip of the 'Dead Hand'", Wall St. J., 24 (1998)
43. Subramanian, Guhan, "Bargaining in the Shadow of Takeover Defenses", Yale Law Journal, 113, pp.621~ (2003)
44. Harris, Lawrence, "Fragmentation, Segmentation, and Regulation, in Global Equity Markets", Technological Competitive and Regulatory Challenges, 269 (1995)
45. Steinberg,Marc I., "Nightmare on Mainstreet: The Paramount Picture Horror Show", Del. J. Corp. L., 16(1) (1991)
46. Ji, Xueqing Linda, "Comment: A New Look at Dead Hand Provisions in Poison Pills: Are They Per Se Invalid After Toll Brothers and Quickturn?", St. Louis L.J., 44, pp.223~ (2000)
47. Lipton,Martin, "Takeover Bids in the Targets Boardroom;Note: Protecting Shareholders against Partial and Two-Tiered Takeovers: The Poison Pill Preferred", Bus. Law;Harv. L. Rev., 35, pp.101~ (1979)
48. Mitchell,Lawrence E, "A Theoretical and Practical Framework for Enforcing Corporate Constituency Statutes", Tex. L. Rev., 70(579), pp.635~36 (1992)
49. Elofson,John, "Should Dead Hand Poison Pills Be Sent to an Early Grave?", Sec. Reg. L.J., 25, pp.303~343 (1997)
50. Holmstrom,Bengt, "Equilibrium Long-Term Labor Contracts", Q.J. Econ., 23, pp.24~25 (1983)
51. Knoeber,, "Golden Parachutes, Shark Repellents, and Hostile Tender Offers", Am. Econ. Rev., 76, pp.155~ (1986)
52. Harris, Ellie G, "Anti-takeover Measures, Golden Parachutes, and Target Firm Shareholder Welfare", Rand J. Econ., 21, pp.614~ (1990)
53. Azariadis, Costas, "Implicit Contracts and Fixed Price Equilibria", Q.J. Econ, 98, pp.6~ (1983)
54. Arnott, Richard J., "Implicit Contracts, Labor Mobility, and Unemployment", Am. Econ. Rev., 78, pp.1046~ (1988)
55. Eisenberg,Melvin A, "The Conception that the Corporation is a Nexus of Contracts, and the Dual Nature of the Firm", Iowa J. Corp. L., 24, pp.819~ (1999)
56. Holdcroft, James P.Jr, "Flexibility in Determining the Role of the Board of Directors in the Age of Information", Cardozo L. Rev., 19, pp.291~ (1997)
57. DeAngelo, Harry, "Anti-takeover Charter Amendments and Stockholder Wealth", J. Fin. Econ., 11, pp.329~ (1983)
58. Linn, Scott C, ", An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of 'Anti-takeover' Amendments on Common Stock Prices", J. Fin. Econ., 11, pp.361~ (1983)
59. Bizjak , John M., "Are Shareholder Proposals ll Bark and No Bite? Evidence from Shareholder Resolutions to Rescind Poison Pills", J. Fin. Quant. Analysis, 33, pp.499~ (1988)
60. Hirschey , Mark, "Long-Term Performance and Financial Policies of Shark Repellent-Adopting Firms", Advances in Financial Economics, 155 (1995)
61. Lewkow , Victor, "The embattled poison pill", PLI, 2006, pp.1528, 599~
62. "Poison Pills and Shareholder Value 1992-1996" (2009)[URL]
63. "The Correlation between Corporate Governance and Company Performance" (2004)[URL]
64. J.P. Morgan & Co, "Poison Pills and Acquisition Premiums(Dec. 18, 1995)", ~ (1995)
65. Poison Pills, Corporate Governance Service 1998 Background Report E., "Bertsch,Kenneth A", ~ (1998)
66. Stout, Lynn A, "Type I Error, Type II Error, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act", Ariz. L. Rev., 38, pp.711~ (1996)
67. Arrow, Kenneth J, "Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing" (1970)
68. Seligman, Joel, "The Reformulation of Federal Securities Law Concerning Nonpublic Information", Geo. L. J., 73, pp.1083~1095 (1985)
69. Mitchell, Lawrence E, "Cooperation and Constraint in the Modern Corporation: An Inquiry into the Causes of Corporate Immorality", Tex. L. Rev., 73, pp.477~ (1995)
70. Romano, Roberta, "The Genius of American Corporate Law" (1993)
71. Easterbrook, Frank H, "The Economic Structure of Corporate Law" (1991)
72. Winter, Ralph K. Jr, "State Law, Shareholder Protection, and the Theory of the Corporation", J. Legal Stud., 6, pp.251~ (1977)
73. Velasco, Julian, "The enduring illegitimacy of the poison pill", J. Corp. L., 27, pp.381~ (2002)
74. Fleischer,Arthur Jr, "Takeover Defense (6th ed.)" (2002)
75. "IRRC Governance Research Service 2004 Background Report E: Poison Pills" (2004)[URL]
76. Brickley, James A, "Outside Directors and the Adoption of Poison Pills", Journal of Financial Economics, 35 (1994)
77. Cotter, James F, "Anil Shivdasani, Marc Zenner, Do Independent Directors Enhance target Shareholder Wealth During Tender Offers?", Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천