본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Syntax of ‘-eyse’ and ‘-kkeyse’ as a Subject Marker

서성기
한국생성문법학회|2022.05|생성문법연구 (Studies in Generative Grammar)|제32권 제2호|pp. 239-266|DOI 10.15860/sigg.32.2.202205.239

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

historical developmenthonorificlocativesubject markerablativestructural casepartitiveexistential verb
주제분류언어학

초록

The honorific subject marker ‘–kkeyse’ and the group subject marker ‘–eyse’ in Korean have often been considered to be the realization of structural case. In this paper, however, it is argued that based on the possibility of cooccurrence with topic markers, focus markers and delimiters, ‘–kkeyse’ and ‘–eyse’ cannot be structural case markers. Considering its semantic properties and distributions as well as its historical development, we claim that ‘–eyse’ when used as a subject marker is partitive. For the honorific subject marker ‘–kkeyse’, there are enough arguments that [Honorific] cannot be an agreement feature and hence ‘–kkeyse’ is not realization of structural case. These taken together strongly suggest that subject markers are not necessarily structural case markers and that subject markers which are not nominative carry some specific meaning.

Abstract

The honorific subject marker ‘–kkeyse’ and the group subject marker ‘–eyse’ in Korean have often been considered to be the realization of structural case. In this paper, however, it is argued that based on the possibility of cooccurrence with topic markers, focus markers and delimiters, ‘–kkeyse’ and ‘–eyse’ cannot be structural case markers. Considering its semantic properties and distributions as well as its historical development, we claim that ‘–eyse’ when used as a subject marker is partitive. For the honorific subject marker ‘–kkeyse’, there are enough arguments that [Honorific] cannot be an agreement feature and hence ‘–kkeyse’ is not realization of structural case. These taken together strongly suggest that subject markers are not necessarily structural case markers and that subject markers which are not nominative carry some specific meaning.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Aritzimuno Lopez, Borja, "Partitive Cases and Related Categories", pp.323~344 (2014), De Gruyter Mouton
  2. Barker, Chris, "Partitives, double genitives, and anti-uniqueness", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, pp.679~717 (1998)
  3. Asbury, Anna, "Towards a typology of morphological case", Nordlyd: Troms Working Papers in Linguistics, 33(1), pp.120~148 (2006)
  4. 최재웅, "Obligatory Honorification and the Honorific Feature", 생성문법연구, 14(4), pp.545~559 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
  5. 최재웅, "한국어 어미 {-시-}와 무정성", 한국어 의미학, 15, pp.273~301 (2004), 한국어의미학회
  6. "Studies in Generative Grammar", 2003, 119~142
  7. Hoop, Helen de, "Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation" (1992), Grodil
  8. 김현주, "主語 標識 {-께서}의 形成에 대하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 41(4), pp.133~159 (2013), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
  9. 김현주, "‘-이서’의 기원에 대한 일고찰", 아시아문화연구, 37, pp.61~82 (2015), 아시아문화연구소[DOI]
  10. Kim, Jong-bok, "Oblique case marking on core arguments in Korean", Studies in Language, 34(3), pp.602~635 (2010)
  11. Kim, Jong-bok, "Korean honorification: A kind of expressive meaning", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16(4), pp.303~336 (2007)
  12. 김정남, "부사격 조사 ‘-에’와 ‘-에서’의 출현 환경에 대한 대비적 고찰", 어문연구, 62, pp.49~76 (2009), 어문연구학회[DOI]
  13. Kim, Minju, "Grammaticalization in Korean: The Evolution of the Existential Verb" (2011), Saffron Books
  14. 김민국, "‘에서’ 주어의 통사와 의미", 國語學, (81), pp.145~190 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
  15. 김민국, "한국어 비주격 주어 표지의 문법화 - 존재 구문 및 탈격을 기원으로 하는 형식을 중심으로 -", 배달말, (65), pp.1~48 (2019), 배달말학회[DOI]
  16. Kiparsky, Paul, "Projecting from the Lexicon", pp.265~307 (1998), CSLI
  17. Kiparsky, Paul, "Structural case in Finnish", Lingua, 111, pp.315~376 (2001)
  18. "Ph.D.", Yonsei University, 2000
  19. "Ph.D.", Woosuk University, 1998
  20. 이정택, "이른바 주격조사 ‘－에서’에 관하여", 한말연구, (27), pp.195~212 (2010), 한말연구학회[DOI]
  21. "Journal of Korean Linguistics", 1976, 41~60
  22. Luraghi, Silvia, "Partitive Cases and Related Categories", pp.17~62 (2014), De Gruyter
  23. Martin, Samuel, "A Reference Grammar of Korean" (1992), Charles E. Tuttle
  24. Palancar, Enrique, "The Origin of Agent Markers" (2002), Akademie Verlag
  25. "Cintanhakpo", 1975, 80~108
  26. "Journal of Korean Linguistics", 1980, 1~25
  27. "The Journal of Linguistic Science", 2000, 187~208
  28. "Korean Journal of Linguistics", 1984, 155~186
  29. Seong, Ki-Cheol, "Hyenday kwuke cwuchey taywu yenkwu", Hankul, 184, pp.81~112 (1984)
  30. Serzant, Ilja, "Typology of partitives", Linguistics, 59(4), pp.881~947 (2021)
  31. Suh, Sungki, "Subjecthood of ‘eyse’-marked phrases in Korean: The possibility of partitive subject", the Korean Generative Grammar Circle, 2019
  32. 서성기, "한국어의 부분격: 주어표지 ‘-에서’", 언어학 연구, (56), pp.55~79 (2020), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
  33. 임창국, "Locative Inversion in Korean", 생성문법연구, 15(1), pp.17~27 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  34. Yoon, James Hye-Suk, "Clitic and Affix Combinations: Theoretical Perspectives", pp.239~282 (2005), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

On the categorial Status of -ey and -eyse정용길한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2008 · 제18권 제4호A Semantic Approach to the Two Locative Markers -ey and -eyse in Korean박덕수한국어문교육연구소 · 한국어문교육2019 · 제29호이른바 주격조사 ‘－에서’에 관하여이정택한말연구학회 · 한말연구2010 · 제27호한국어 주격표지, 격표지의 생략, 초점, 그리고 화제이종근사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2021 · 제29권 제4호On the Identity and Distribution of “Case Markers” in Korean채희락한국언어학회 · 언어2023 · 제48권 제2호주어를 찾아서김원호한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2014 · 제21권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

허사 ‘하-’의 세 가지 유형최기용pp. 267-329Bound Noun swu in Korean: A Reply to Park (2022)김태식pp. 331-351Notes on Yes as a Rejoinder and a Polar AnswerPhilip Yoongoo Jung, 양희선, 박범식pp. 353-376한국생성문법학회의 시작 그리고 미래–양동휘 교수님 인터뷰박명관, 김선웅, 문귀선, 정대호pp. 377-382
원문 보기