본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Study of Republic of Korea Air Force’s Military Capability Enhancement Measures in Preparation for Wartime Operational Control Transfer

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Republic of Korea and the United States have agreed to the terms of the Wartime OPCON Transfer contingent upon meeting specific conditions. The OPCON Transfer should lead to improved security of the Korean Peninsula while improving the ROK–U.S. combined defense capability. Hence, the Korea Armed Forces must exert efforts to acquire the capabilities and conditions required for the transfer. Further, “the United States’ supplementation and continuation capabilities” and “the provision and employment of extended deterrence methods and strategic assets” must be continued. The way to firmly maintain security over the Korean Peninsula is for the ROK military to possess capabilities required for the OPCON Transfer. Of these capabilities, ROKAF’s capability is crucial and the ISR+PGMs capabilities must be obtained without fail. Accurate information on military threats and the ability to strike those targets are prerequisites to winning wars. In pursuing the national security strategy task of “strengthening national defense capabilities based on the ROK–U.S. alliance,” with support from the general public, rational decisions on airpower requirements and the measurement of enemies’ airpower must be made at the national strategic level, to determine what it would take for the ROKAF to lead ROK–U.S. combined air operations. Concurrently, we need to be ready and be prepared to respond to the expansion of neighboring nations’ airpower capability.

Abstract

The Republic of Korea and the United States have agreed to the terms of the Wartime OPCON Transfer contingent upon meeting specific conditions. The OPCON Transfer should lead to improved security of the Korean Peninsula while improving the ROK–U.S. combined defense capability. Hence, the Korea Armed Forces must exert efforts to acquire the capabilities and conditions required for the transfer. Further, “the United States’ supplementation and continuation capabilities” and “the provision and employment of extended deterrence methods and strategic assets” must be continued. The way to firmly maintain security over the Korean Peninsula is for the ROK military to possess capabilities required for the OPCON Transfer. Of these capabilities, ROKAF’s capability is crucial and the ISR+PGMs capabilities must be obtained without fail. Accurate information on military threats and the ability to strike those targets are prerequisites to winning wars. In pursuing the national security strategy task of “strengthening national defense capabilities based on the ROK–U.S. alliance,” with support from the general public, rational decisions on airpower requirements and the measurement of enemies’ airpower must be made at the national strategic level, to determine what it would take for the ROKAF to lead ROK–U.S. combined air operations. Concurrently, we need to be ready and be prepared to respond to the expansion of neighboring nations’ airpower capability.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Jeon Hyun Suk, "U.S. Forces in Korea, Even If the Right to Operate", Chosun Ilbo, ~ (2018)
  2. "Korea Institute for Military Affairs Newsletter, no. 393" (2018)[URL]
  3. Park Sung-jin, "No Use of Army, Navy and Air Force, Make a Buffer Zone and No War on the Korean Peninsula", The Kyunghyang Shinmun, ~ (2018)
  4. Kang Yun-hyuk, "Establishing the Buffer Zone in the MDL from November––Banning Hostile Activities against Land, Maritime, and Air", Seoul Newspaper, ~ (2018)
  5. Lee Kyoung-Joo, "U.S. Deputy Commander of the ROK Armed Forces Sentence Speeds Up the Transfer of Pledge in the Term", Seoul Newspaper, ~ (2018)
  6. Jung Heewan, "Confirming U.S. Covenant Sergeant Kwon Ji-kyum in the Case of the Transfer of the Omnipotence––Security Anxiety Theory", Kyunghyang Newspaper, ~ (2018)
  7. "USFK Stationed in the Wartime" (2018)[URL]
  8. "Agreed to Establish the Future ROK-US CFC Which will be Commanded by Korean General" (2018)[URL]
  9. Myung Soo Yeol, "Drive Including Elite Structure Structuring and Efficient Defense Operation", Defense Daily, ~ (2018)
  10. "2019 Ministry of Defense Report" (2018)[URL]
  11. "Defense Reform 2.0" (2019)[URL]
  12. Joint Chiefs of Staff, "Military Terms Dictionary of Joint Combined Operations", Joint Chiefs of Staff, 235~391 (2010)
  13. Lee Chang-Hoon, "09 Joint IOC Verification Achievements and Directions for Development", ROK Joint Chiefs of Staff Journal, (42), pp.32~33 (2010), ROK Joint Chiefs of Staff
  14. Jang Ye-jin, "The First Verification of ROK Military Wartime OPCON", Yonhap News, ~ (2019)
  15. Paik Min-Jung, "Analytics and Implications of U.S. Expert View on Transition of Wartime OPCON", KIDA Weekly Defense Forum, (1647), pp.3~ (2016)
  16. 홍성표, "전시작전통제권 전환과 공군력 발전방향", 평화연구, 17(2), pp.188~228 (2009), 평화와 민주주의연구소
  17. Lee Sang-Heon, "Remington Commander, U.S. AF Return of the AF Command when Korea Is Ready", Hankyoreh, ~ (2009)
  18. Blue House National Security Office, "National Security Strategy of Moon Jae-in Government", Blue House, 21~32 (2018)
  19. Ministry of Defense, "2016 Defense White Paper", pp.44~ (2016), Ministry of Defense
  20. James A. Winnefeld, "Gulf War Airline Analysis", pp.189~ (2007), Hadden Morning
  21. Ministry of Defense, "2018 Defense White Paper", pp.50~ (2018), Ministry of Defense
  22. Lee Joo-Hyung, "ROK Four-Star General, Commander of the Future CFC", National Defense Daily, ~ (2019)
  23. Cho, "A Study on the Importance of U.S. Forces in Korea through National Interests:Focusing on Security Issues and Information Ability Analysis", paper presented at International Conference on Political Science 2018 Winter Conference, National Diplomatic Academy (2018)
  24. John A. Warden III, "The Air Campaign", pp.238~ (2007), Yeonkyung Munhwa

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)