공교육의 로봇교육 내실화를 위한 교사 인식 조사
Survey on Teacher's Cognition for the Improvement of Robotics Education in Public Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to improve robotics education in public education. This study was conducted with 157 secondary school teachers regardless of their gender, age and majors. The results are as follows: First, 68.2% of the respondents (81.2% of the STEM(Science, Technology,Engineering, Mathematics)-related teachers) thought that robotics education should be included in public education because it will be a very important area in the future. Second, 73.3% of respondents (89.3% of the STEM-related teachers) agreed that robotics education will be worth teaching as a regular subject. The most important reason was that they thought the robots would be an excellent tool to initiate their class participation and increase their study motivation. Third, the results from this survey showed that the technology teachers would be the best suitable instructors for robotics education. Lastly, teachers felt a great deal of burden to teach robotics although they thought robotics education was necessary. In order to implement robotics education in public school, teachers think it is necessary to take professional training. In addition, teachers should be supported with the reduction in their workload along with sufficient fundings, educational robots such as LEGO MINDSTORMS,and newly designed teaching materials.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to improve robotics education in public education. This study was conducted with 157 secondary school teachers regardless of their gender, age and majors. The results are as follows: First, 68.2% of the respondents (81.2% of the STEM(Science, Technology,Engineering, Mathematics)-related teachers) thought that robotics education should be included in public education because it will be a very important area in the future. Second, 73.3% of respondents (89.3% of the STEM-related teachers) agreed that robotics education will be worth teaching as a regular subject. The most important reason was that they thought the robots would be an excellent tool to initiate their class participation and increase their study motivation. Third, the results from this survey showed that the technology teachers would be the best suitable instructors for robotics education. Lastly, teachers felt a great deal of burden to teach robotics although they thought robotics education was necessary. In order to implement robotics education in public school, teachers think it is necessary to take professional training. In addition, teachers should be supported with the reduction in their workload along with sufficient fundings, educational robots such as LEGO MINDSTORMS,and newly designed teaching materials.
참고문헌 (9)
- 김진수, "기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색", 한국기술교육학회지, 7(3), pp.1~29 (2007), 한국기술교육학회
- R. Ronald, "Advancing the "E" in K-12 STEM Education", The Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), pp.53~64 (2010)
- 조혜경, "교육+로봇:비전과 액션플랜", 정보과학회지, 26(4), pp.55~64 (2008)
- M. Jacek, "Some Thoughts on Robotics for Education", Presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium on Robotics and Education, pp.1040~1045 (2011)
- A, Nagchaudhuri, "Middle School Students get Introduced to Fundamentals of Engineering at the UMES-NOAA Summer Camp", Proceedings of Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, pp.83~91 (2003)
- S, Shawna, "Robotics Programs Stimulate Hawaii Country Girls Interest in Engineering", Proceedings of WEPAN, 2005, 356~365
- K. W, Lau, "Creative learning in school with LEGO Programmable Robotics Products", Proceedings of 29th ASEE, 1999, 26~31
- F. G, Martin, "Design, Story-Tellin, and Robots in Irish Primary Education", Proceedings of IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics conference, pp.730~735 (2000)
- 김성애, "중학교 기술교과에서의 ＂로봇＂활용 교육 방안", 한국기술교육학회지, 6, pp.127~147 (2006), 한국기술교육학회