본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Strategic Rivalry in the Asia-Pacific Theater: A New Nuclear Arms Race?

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

While the progress to date on denuclearizing North Korea is encouraging, proclaiming the end of nuclear threats in Northeast Asia is premature. First, North Korea has lately been having second thoughts with regard to full disclosure of its nuclear holdings. Second, and more seriously, the deterioration of Russo- American relations over nuclear issues is not confined to a strictly European agenda. Issues arising out of the Bush administration’s nuclear strategy that seem to expand the parameters for first-strike use by America, the future of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, and missile defenses in Asia in the context of revivified U.S. alliances in Asia have all appeared on the agenda and could lead to negative consequences for Asian security. Two potential consequences in particular could emerge. One could be a nuclear arms race between Moscow and Washington, while another could see further movement toward the consolidation of a genuine Sino-Russian bloc in opposition to what Moscow and Beijing both see as a consolidation of such a bloc around missile defenses and the strengthening of the U.S. alliance system in Asia.

Abstract

While the progress to date on denuclearizing North Korea is encouraging, proclaiming the end of nuclear threats in Northeast Asia is premature. First, North Korea has lately been having second thoughts with regard to full disclosure of its nuclear holdings. Second, and more seriously, the deterioration of Russo- American relations over nuclear issues is not confined to a strictly European agenda. Issues arising out of the Bush administration’s nuclear strategy that seem to expand the parameters for first-strike use by America, the future of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, and missile defenses in Asia in the context of revivified U.S. alliances in Asia have all appeared on the agenda and could lead to negative consequences for Asian security. Two potential consequences in particular could emerge. One could be a nuclear arms race between Moscow and Washington, while another could see further movement toward the consolidation of a genuine Sino-Russian bloc in opposition to what Moscow and Beijing both see as a consolidation of such a bloc around missile defenses and the strengthening of the U.S. alliance system in Asia.

참고문헌 (94)

  1. Gilbert Rozman, "Security Challenges to the United States in Northeast Asia: Looking Beyond the Transformation of the Six-Party Talks, In East Asian Security: Two Views" (2007), Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College
  2. "Northeast Asian Peace and Security Network (NAPSNET)", ~ (2007)
  3. "NAPSNET, December 7, 2007", ~ (2007)
  4. "Seoul: No Progress on Nuclear Disclosure by North Korea" (2007), Deutsche Presse Agentur
  5. Jing-dong Yuan, "Beijing Keeps a Wary Eye on the Korean Peace Process", Jamestown China Brief, 7(22), pp.7~8 (2007)
  6. Matthew Lee, "Rice: U.S. Not Ready for Broad N. Korea Ties" (2007), Associated Press
  7. "Seoul Yonhap News Agency", ~ (2007)
  8. Foreign Broadcast Information Service, "Central Eurasia (hereafter FBIS SOV)", ~ (2007)
  9. Helene Cooper, "North Korea Replies to Bush with an Offer and a Condition", New York Times, ~ (2007)
  10. OSC Feature*North Korea*OSC Analysis, "Open Source Center", FBIS SOV, ~ (2007)
  11. "IAEA in Full Control of Iran’s Nuclear Program*Foreign Ministry", RIA Novosti, ~ (2007)
  12. "Russia Says Fuel for Iran NPP Insufficient for Weapon Use", RIA Novosti, ~ (2007)
  13. Alexander Lukin, "Russia’s China Card: Eyes on Washington, In Power and Security in Northeast Asia: Shifting Strategies", pp.167~193 (2007), Lynne Rienner
  14. Assertive Pragmatism: China’s Economic Rise and Its Impact on Chinese Foreign Policy, "Minxin Pei", Institut Franc¸ais des Relations Internationales, ~, pp.IFRI Proliferation Papers, no. 15 (2006)
  15. David Kerr, "The Sino-Russian Partnership and U.S. Policy Toward North Korea: From Hegemony to Concert in Northeast Asia", International Studies Quarterly, 49(3), pp.411~437 (2005)
  16. Constantine C. Menges, "China: The Gathering Threat" (2005), Nelson Current
  17. Stephen Blank, "Toward Alliance?: The Strategic Implications of Russo- Chinese Relations", National Security Studies Quarterly, 7(3), pp.1~30 (2001)
  18. Robert Jervis, "U.S. Grand Strategy: Mission Impossible", Naval War College Review, (Summer), pp.22~36 (1998)
  19. Richard K. Betts, "Power, Prospects, and Priorities: Choices for Strategic Change", Naval War College Review, (Winter), pp.9~22 (1997)
  20. "Intelligence Challenges Through 2015"[URL]
  21. "The Relevance of Central Asia" (2005)[URL]
  22. Lyle Goldstein, "China, Japan and the Scramble for Siberia", Survival, 48(1), pp.175~176 (2006)
  23. John J. Tkacik, Jr, "How the PLA Sees North Korea, In Shaping China’s Security Environment: The Role of the People’s Liberation Army", pp.160~163 (2006), Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College
  24. "Moscow, ITAR-TASS (in Russian), FBIS SOV, February 29, 2004", ~ (2004)
  25. "The Nightmare Comes to Pass", The Economist, ~ (2006)
  26. James Brian McNabb, "The Unanticipated Utility of U.S. Security Structures: Avoiding Cold War II in Central Asia", Comparative Strategy, 25(4), pp.307~327 (2006)
  27. What North Korea Really Wants, "Robert Carlin", Northeast Asian Peace and Security Network (NAPSNET), ~ (2007)
  28. Charles L. Pritchard, "Failed Diplomacy: The Tragic Story of How North Korea Got the Bomb", pp.112~ (2007), Brookings Institution Press
  29. North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War World, "Samuel S. Kim", Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, ~ (2007)
  30. "Yonhap News Agency, May 25, 2005", ~ (2005)
  31. Gordon Fairclough, "South Korean Aid to North Increases Tensions with U.S.", Wall Street Journal, pp.1~ (2005)
  32. Military Thought 2, , conference at the Academy of Military Sciences in Moscow (2007)
  33. M.A. Gareev, "Russia’s New Military Doctrine: Structure and Substance", 1~14
  34. Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation (Plans for a Report), "Y.N. Baluyevsky", 15~22
  35. A.S. Rukshin, "Doctrinal Views on Employment and Organizational Development of the Armed Forces of Russia", 23~30
  36. Yaroslav Cheslavovich Romanchuk, "When Silence Is a Weakness", Moscow, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, ~ (2007)
  37. "Federal’nomu Sobraniiu Rossiiskoi Federatsii, April 26, 2007", ~ (2007)
  38. "Interview with General Yuri Baluyevsky, First Deputy Defense Minister and Chief of the Russian Federation Armed Forces General Staff", Rossiyskaya Gazeta, ~ (2007)
  39. , Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security (2007)
  40. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Capabilities, , Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, 11~12 (2006)
  41. "U.S. Report Warns of Russian Nuclear Threat"[URL]
  42. Vice Prime Minister Sergey Ivanov, Governors, and Twenty Thousand Soldiers, "Igor Plugtarev", ~ (2006)
  43. Nuclear Superiority: The New Triad and the Evolution of Nuclear Strategy, "David S. McDonough", ~, pp.Adelphi Paper, no. 383 (2006)
  44. Keir A. Lieber, "The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy", Foreign Affairs, 85(2), pp.42~54 (2006)
  45. Keir A. Lieber, "The End of MAD?: The Nuclear Dimensions of U.S. Primacy", International Security, 20(4), pp.7~44 (2006)
  46. George Bunn, "U.S. Nuclear Policy: Confronting Today’s Threats, Foreword" (2006), Brookings Institution Press
  47. David Blair, "How to Defeat the United States: The Operational Effects of the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, In Fighting Proliferation: New Concepts for the Nineties", pp.75~88 (1996), University Press
  48. David McDonough, "The U.S. Nuclear Shift to the Pacific", RUSI Journal, pp.64~68 (2006)
  49. Vladimir Dvorkin, "The Russian Debate on the Nonproliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Delivery Vehicles No. 4", pp.9~ (2004), Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University
  50. Guy Dinmore, "Russia Confronted Rumsfeld with Threat to Quit Key Nuclear Treaty", Financial Times, pp.1~ (2005)
  51. "Scrapping Medium-Range Ballistic Missiles a Mistake*Ivanov-1", RIA Novosti (2007)
  52. Guy Dinmore, "Russia Confronted Rumsfeld with Threat to Quit Key Nuclear Treaty", Financial Times, 1~ (2005)
  53. Alexei Arbatov, "An Unnecessary and Dangerous Step", Nezavisismoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, (7) (2007)
  54. Martin Sieff, "Russia Rattles Missile Treaty", UPI (2006)
  55. Maksim Agarkov, "New Threat", Ekspert, ~ (2007)
  56. "Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty Newsline", ~ (2007)
  57. Nikolai Sokov, "Second Thoughts About a First Strike", Nonproliferation Review, 14(1), pp.141~ (2007)
  58. A Russian Chronology: October-December 2005, "Mark Smith", Conflict Studies Research Centre, 13~ (2006)
  59. "U.S. Defense Chief Sees Problems in Russian Withdrawal from INF", ITAR-TASS, ~ (2007)
  60. Alexei Arbatov, "An Unnecessary and Dangerous Step, In Beyond Nuclear Deterrence: Transforming the U.S.-Russian Equation" (2006), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  61. George Bunn, "Nuclear Weapons Policy, Confronting Today’s Threats" (2006), Brookings Institution Press
  62. Stephen Blank, "Undeterred: The Return of Nuclear War", Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 1(2), pp.55~63 (2000)
  63. Jonathan Pollack, "U.S. Strategies in Asia: A Revisionist Hegemon, In Power and Security in Northeast Asia: Shifting Strategies", pp.86~87 (2007), Lynne Rienner
  64. "Japan Intercepts Missile in Milestone Test", Reuters, ~ (2007)
  65. "China Unmoved by Japan Missile Interception", Reuters, ~ (2007)
  66. Kristian Atland, "Introduction, Adoption and Implementation of Russia’s ‘Northern Strategic Bastion’ Concept, 1992-1999", Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 10(4), pp.499~528 (2007)
  67. Minxin Pei, "China’s Hedged Acquiescence, In Power and Security in Northeast Asia: Shifting Strategies", pp.115~ (2007), Lynne Rienner
  68. China’s Nuclear Forces: Operations, Training, Doctrine, Command, Control, and Campaign Planning, "Larry M. Wortzel", Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, ~ (2007)
  69. Esook Yoon, "A View from Asia, Vladimir Putin’s Korean Opportunity: Russian Interests in the North Korean Nuclear Crises", Comparative Strategy, 24(3), pp.188~ (2005)
  70. Alexander Ignatov, "Russia in the Asia-Pacific, In Russia and America in the Asia- Pacific", pp.9~11 (2007), AsiaPacific Center for Security Studies
  71. Glenn C. Buchan, "Future Roles of U.S. Nuclear Forces: Implications for U.S. Strategy", pp.15~ (2000), Rand Corporation
  72. U.S.-Russia Relations: Awaiting the G-8, "Joseph Ferguson", Comparative Connections, ~ (2006)
  73. Azar Gat, "The Return of Authoritarian Great Powers", Foreign Affairs, 85(4) (2007)
  74. Charles L. Glaser, "Counterforce Revisited: Assessing the Nuclear Posture Review’s New Missions", International Security, 30(2), pp.84~126 (2005)
  75. Senator Carl Levin (D-Michigan), "Toward a More Responsible Nuclear Nonproliferation Strategy", Arms Control Today January-February, 9~14 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)