Investigation of Floss Preference by Types and Future Use Intention according to Floss Experience
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The use of dental floss along with a toothbrush is a well-known oral hygiene product that effectively removes dental plaque and reduces the risk of dental caries and periodontal disease. Despite the fact that various types of floss are being used, flossing methods based on the thread type are being taught. In addition, personal preference according to the floss types has not been investigated. In this study, individual preferences according to the floss types were investigated by experiencing various types of dental floss to both floss users and non-users. In addition, the change in intention to use dental floss in the future after flossing experience of non-users was investigated.Methods: General public participated in the individual interview survey (n=419). Subjects responded to the questionnaire after using all of the thread type, Y-type, and C-type floss. All statistics were expressed frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and the chi-squared test was used to determine the statistical significance of associations between the variables.Results: As a result of the analysis, the preference of C-type floss was highest in both floss users and non-users. The biggest reason for not using dental floss was not knowing the necessity of flossing (36.4%). In addition, both floss users and non-users responded that C-type floss was suitable for flossing in the anterior and posterior regions. The change in the positive future intention to use dental floss after flossing experience of non-users was statistically significantly associated with age.Conclusion: This result suggests that there is a need to provide education on how to use dental floss in various forms. Based on this, it will be possible to lead a change in individual's attitude for future oral health through active and continuous flossing experience.
Abstract
Background: The use of dental floss along with a toothbrush is a well-known oral hygiene product that effectively removes dental plaque and reduces the risk of dental caries and periodontal disease. Despite the fact that various types of floss are being used, flossing methods based on the thread type are being taught. In addition, personal preference according to the floss types has not been investigated. In this study, individual preferences according to the floss types were investigated by experiencing various types of dental floss to both floss users and non-users. In addition, the change in intention to use dental floss in the future after flossing experience of non-users was investigated.Methods: General public participated in the individual interview survey (n=419). Subjects responded to the questionnaire after using all of the thread type, Y-type, and C-type floss. All statistics were expressed frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and the chi-squared test was used to determine the statistical significance of associations between the variables.Results: As a result of the analysis, the preference of C-type floss was highest in both floss users and non-users. The biggest reason for not using dental floss was not knowing the necessity of flossing (36.4%). In addition, both floss users and non-users responded that C-type floss was suitable for flossing in the anterior and posterior regions. The change in the positive future intention to use dental floss after flossing experience of non-users was statistically significantly associated with age.Conclusion: This result suggests that there is a need to provide education on how to use dental floss in various forms. Based on this, it will be possible to lead a change in individual's attitude for future oral health through active and continuous flossing experience.
참고문헌 (16)
- "Frequent disease statistics 2021"[URL]
- 윤현서, "성인의 구강위생용품에 관한 지식수준과 사용태도 조사", 치위생과학회지, 9(3), pp.339~344 (2009), 한국치위생과학회
- Fleisher KE, "Sentinel lymph node mapping of oral and pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma- result of a prospective study", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61(Suppl 8), pp.60A~61A (2003)[DOI]
- Zimmer S, "Clinical efficacy of flossing versus use of antimicrobial rinses", J Periodontol, 77, pp.1380~1385 (2006)[DOI]
- Arora V, "Efficacy of dental floss and chlorhexidine mouth rinse as an adjunct to toothbrushing in removing plaque and gingival inflammation- a three way cross over trial", J Clin Diagn Res, 8, pp.ZC01~ZC04 (2014)[DOI]
- Kiger RD, "A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes", J Clin Periodontol, 18, pp.681~684 (1991)[DOI]
- Kleber CJ, "Duration and pattern of toothbrushing in children using a gel or paste dentifrice", J Am Dent Assoc, 103, pp.723~726 (1981)[DOI]
- Cumming BR, "Consistency of plaque distribution in individuals without special home care instruction", J Periodontal Res, 8, pp.94~100 (1973)[DOI]
- Bruun C, "A new in vitro method for testing the interproximal cleaning potential of toothbrushing", J Clin Dent, 9, pp.11~15 (1998)
- Axelsson P, "Needs-related plaque control measures based on risk prediction", Proceedings of the European Workshop on mechanical plague control, pp.190~247 (1998), Quintessence Publishing
- Goyal CR, "Evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of a water flosser compared to string floss in adults after a single use", J Clin Dent, 24, pp.37~42 (2013)
- Arora V, "Efficacy of dental floss and chlorhexidine mouth rinse as an adjunct to toothbrushing in removing plaque and gingival inflammation- a three way cross over trial", J Clin Diagn Res, 8, pp.ZC01~ZC04 (2014)[DOI]
- "Philips Sonicare:2017 Korea oral health and brushing habits survey report"[URL]
- "2016 yearbook of the Korean dentistry"[URL]
- Berchier CE, "The efficacy of dental floss in addition to a toothbrush on plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation : a systematic review", Int J Dent Hyg, 6, pp.265~279 (2008)[DOI]
- "Cochrane review reveals benefits of flossing for reducing gingivitis", J Can Dent Assoc, 78, pp.c11~ (2012)