치과의원 환자의 구강위생용품에 대한 인지도, 용도이해 및 사용실태에 관한 연구
A study on the status of recognition, understanding of the use and practical application of oral hygiene devices in dental clinics patients
2
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : This study was to examine the recognition and understanding of the use, application of oral hygiene supplies among dental clinic patients in a bid to stress the necessity of education on the right awareness and use of oral hygiene supplies, to provide information on the development of educational programs and ultimately to help promote the oral health of people in general. Methods : The subjects in this study were 314 patients who visited dental clinics in North Jeolla Province in June 2009. Results : 1. Out of oral hygiene supplies, the largest number of the patients investigated(74.6%) were best cognizant of dental floss, and the greatest group(77.7%) had the right understanding of the use of toothpick. Currently, the oral hygiene supplies that were most widely in use were toothpicks( 43.2%). 2. As to the relationship of awareness and understanding of the use, application of oral hygiene supplies to subjective oral health status, 50.0 percent of the patients who understood the use of toothpick found themselves to be in good health, and the gaps between them and the others were statistically significant. Among those who were aware of dental floss, the largest group(51.4%) considered themselves to be in good shape, and in the event of those who understood the use of dental floss, the greatest group(49.2%) deemed themselves to be in good health. Out of those who understood the use of mouse rinse, the largest group(53.7%) thought they were in good health(p<0.05). 3. Recognition of interdental brush, understanding of its use and whether to use it currently or not were identified as parents to use oral hygiene supplies recommended by dental clinics(p<0.05). 4. Recognition of interdental brush, understanding of its use and whether to use it currently or not were identified as patients to use oral hygiene supplies recommended by dental clinics(p<0.05). 5. The largest group of those who didn't put dental floss to use didn't use it for other reasons unspecified in the questionnaire, and the second greatest group of them didn't use it since it was so onerous to do that. There were statistically significant differences in the reason why they didn't use the oral hygiene supplies(p<0.05). 6. Awareness of dental floss and interdental brush, understanding of the use of the two and whether to use the two at present or not made statistically significant differences to whether they were likely to use the oral hygiene supplies in the future. And whether they were likely to use the oral hygiene supplies in the future was statistically significantly different according to awareness of mouse rinse and understanding of the use of it as well(p<0.05). Conclusions : Dental hygienists have to provide patients with various data of oral hygiene devices through oral health education and then only patients caring in dental clinics can choose the appropriate devices to claim for their own disease.
Abstract
Objectives : This study was to examine the recognition and understanding of the use, application of oral hygiene supplies among dental clinic patients in a bid to stress the necessity of education on the right awareness and use of oral hygiene supplies, to provide information on the development of educational programs and ultimately to help promote the oral health of people in general. Methods : The subjects in this study were 314 patients who visited dental clinics in North Jeolla Province in June 2009. Results : 1. Out of oral hygiene supplies, the largest number of the patients investigated(74.6%) were best cognizant of dental floss, and the greatest group(77.7%) had the right understanding of the use of toothpick. Currently, the oral hygiene supplies that were most widely in use were toothpicks( 43.2%). 2. As to the relationship of awareness and understanding of the use, application of oral hygiene supplies to subjective oral health status, 50.0 percent of the patients who understood the use of toothpick found themselves to be in good health, and the gaps between them and the others were statistically significant. Among those who were aware of dental floss, the largest group(51.4%) considered themselves to be in good shape, and in the event of those who understood the use of dental floss, the greatest group(49.2%) deemed themselves to be in good health. Out of those who understood the use of mouse rinse, the largest group(53.7%) thought they were in good health(p<0.05). 3. Recognition of interdental brush, understanding of its use and whether to use it currently or not were identified as parents to use oral hygiene supplies recommended by dental clinics(p<0.05). 4. Recognition of interdental brush, understanding of its use and whether to use it currently or not were identified as patients to use oral hygiene supplies recommended by dental clinics(p<0.05). 5. The largest group of those who didn't put dental floss to use didn't use it for other reasons unspecified in the questionnaire, and the second greatest group of them didn't use it since it was so onerous to do that. There were statistically significant differences in the reason why they didn't use the oral hygiene supplies(p<0.05). 6. Awareness of dental floss and interdental brush, understanding of the use of the two and whether to use the two at present or not made statistically significant differences to whether they were likely to use the oral hygiene supplies in the future. And whether they were likely to use the oral hygiene supplies in the future was statistically significantly different according to awareness of mouse rinse and understanding of the use of it as well(p<0.05). Conclusions : Dental hygienists have to provide patients with various data of oral hygiene devices through oral health education and then only patients caring in dental clinics can choose the appropriate devices to claim for their own disease.
참고문헌 (19)
- 정미경, "고정성 치열교정 장치 장착치아에 대한 치간 칫솔의 치면세균막 제거 효과 연구", 대한구강보건학회지, 31(4), pp.602~610 (2007), 대한구강보건학회
- 이영혜, "서울특별시 가정구강보건실태에 관한 조사연구", 대한구강보건학회지, 24(3), pp.239~257 (2000)
- 김명은, "일부 서비스 종사자들의 구강위생보조용품의 사용실태에 관한 조사 연구", 한국치위생학회지, 8(3), pp.37~52 (2008), 한국치위생학회
- 김종배, "공중구강보건학. 재개정판", pp.29~31 (2000), 고문사
- 장경애, "일부 치과병원 흡연환자의 구강위생용품 이용도", 치위생과학회지, 8(1), pp.7~12 (2008), 한국치위생과학회
- 양수정, "잇솔질 및 혓솔질의 구취감소 효과에 관한 연구", 대한구강보건학회지, 17(2), pp.268~278 (1993)
- 배광학, "NaF CPC 녹차추출액및 솔잎추출물을 배합한 구강양치액의 치주질환예방효과와 구취감소효과 및 치아우식 증예방효과에 관한 연구", 대한구강보건학회지, 25(1), pp.51~59 (2001)
- Hassell TM, "Tissue and cells of the Periodontium", Periodontol 2000, 3, pp.9~38 (1993)
- Heins PJ, "A histologic study of the width and nature of inter-radicular space in human adult pre-molars and molar", J Dent Res, 65, pp.948~951 (1986)
- 서은주, "한국인의 구강위생용품 사용실태에 관한 조사연구", 대한구강보건학회지, 27(2), pp.177~194 (2003), 대한구강보건학회
- 심형순, "치간잇솔의 두부형태에 따른 치면세균막 제거효과", 대한구강보건학회지, 29(3), pp.360~367 (2005), 대한구강보건학회
- 이천희, "미세진동 자극을 이용한 구강물리요법의 치면세균막 제거 및 치은염 완화 효과에 대한 연구", 대한구강보건학회지, 32(1), pp.96~104 (2008), 대한구강보건학회
- 윤신종, "전동칫솔의 구강청결 효과에 관한 임상적 조사연구", 대한구강보건학회지, 17(2), pp.356~369 (1993)
- 김종배, "구강환경관리용품의 선택에 관한 조사연구", 대한구강보건학회지, 14, pp.493~504 (1992)
- 박홍련, "D중공업 근로자의 구강위생용품 사용실태 조사", 치위생과학회지, 6(2), pp.93~99 (2006)
- 구경미, "구강보건교육학. 제2판", pp.115~116 (2008), 고문사
- 김수경, "치과병·의원 내원환자의 구강위생용품에 대한 인지도 및 사용실태에 관한 연구", 치위생과학회지, 2(2), pp.95~103 (2002)
- 김영남, "한국 성인의 주관적 구강건강인식과 객관적 구강건강상태와의 관련성", 대한구강보건학회지, 29(3), pp.250~260 (2005), 대한구강보건학회
- 김혜영, "단문항 자기평가에 의한 주관적 구강건강인식에 영향을 미치는 요인", 대한구강보건학회지, 29(4), pp.496~505 (2005), 대한구강보건학회
