본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

친자관계의 결정에 관한 법적 쟁점 분석

The Analysis of Legal Issues on the Determination of Parentage

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In recent years, interest in legal parentage has been gradually increasing. One of the reasons is that the parts that were accepted without any problems beforehand are being developed in various aspects with the change of reality of the times. In this paper, we summarize the main contents of legal issues that are particularly important in terms of the determination of parentage. 1. Although not expressly provided for in Article 844 of the Civil Code, only children who are subject to presumption of paternity should be regarded as a child born in wedlock. Domestic practice and many theories have classified ‘a child born within 200 days from the date of marriage’ as a child born in wedlock, but the theory of interpretation that this child is the object of affiliation as a child born out of wedlock is the most natural. 2. With regard to affiliation with the Judicial Permission, there are issues that are not easy to solve in various aspects, such as when they come into effect, their legal meaning, and the scope of their application. 3. On the one hand, there can be no basis for total denial of affiliation of mother under Article 855 (1) of the Civil Code, but on the other hand, if a mother intends to report birth, it is required to attach a birth certificate which is a written proof of childbirth, and if a mother intends to affiliate his/her child, it is not advisable that the mother-child relationship be recognized without such a proof. 4. The trial procedure for the establishment of the mother-child relationship of a child born out of wedlock shall be regarded as possible only by the claim for affiliation against mother under Article 863, 865 of the Civil Code. However, if we admit that the establishment of the mother-child relationship is based on pregnancy and delivery, we can consider improving the system in the direction of accepting a confirmation claim of parentage existence as in current practice. 5. If with regard to a child born out of wedlock who gave birth between a father and a woman other than the wife, a father reports birth as a child born in wedlock between a father and the wife, and then there is given a confirmation judgment of parentage non-existence between the child and the mother, it is said that such a report of birth has become invalid as a result, and therefore, the validity of the affiliation on the birth report cannot be recognized.

Abstract

In recent years, interest in legal parentage has been gradually increasing. One of the reasons is that the parts that were accepted without any problems beforehand are being developed in various aspects with the change of reality of the times. In this paper, we summarize the main contents of legal issues that are particularly important in terms of the determination of parentage. 1. Although not expressly provided for in Article 844 of the Civil Code, only children who are subject to presumption of paternity should be regarded as a child born in wedlock. Domestic practice and many theories have classified ‘a child born within 200 days from the date of marriage’ as a child born in wedlock, but the theory of interpretation that this child is the object of affiliation as a child born out of wedlock is the most natural. 2. With regard to affiliation with the Judicial Permission, there are issues that are not easy to solve in various aspects, such as when they come into effect, their legal meaning, and the scope of their application. 3. On the one hand, there can be no basis for total denial of affiliation of mother under Article 855 (1) of the Civil Code, but on the other hand, if a mother intends to report birth, it is required to attach a birth certificate which is a written proof of childbirth, and if a mother intends to affiliate his/her child, it is not advisable that the mother-child relationship be recognized without such a proof. 4. The trial procedure for the establishment of the mother-child relationship of a child born out of wedlock shall be regarded as possible only by the claim for affiliation against mother under Article 863, 865 of the Civil Code. However, if we admit that the establishment of the mother-child relationship is based on pregnancy and delivery, we can consider improving the system in the direction of accepting a confirmation claim of parentage existence as in current practice. 5. If with regard to a child born out of wedlock who gave birth between a father and a woman other than the wife, a father reports birth as a child born in wedlock between a father and the wife, and then there is given a confirmation judgment of parentage non-existence between the child and the mother, it is said that such a report of birth has become invalid as a result, and therefore, the validity of the affiliation on the birth report cannot be recognized.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 권재문, "親生子關係의 決定基準" (2011), 景仁文化社
  2. 김상용, "친생추정에 관한 2017년 개정민법 규정의 문제점", 法學論文集, 42(1), pp.165~198 (2018), 법학연구원[DOI]
  3. 김성숙, "인지제도 정비를 위한 검토", 가족법연구, 16(1), pp.5~207 (2002), 한국가족법학회
  4. 金容旭, "母의 認知", 司法行政, 248 (1981), 韓國司法行政學會
  5. "司法行政", 1986, ~, pp.韓國司法行政學會
  6. 金疇洙, "親族·相續法" (2002), 法文社
  7. 金疇洙, (2016), 韓國司法行政學會
  8. 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2018), 法文社
  9. 김형배, "민법학강의" (2016), 신조사
  10. 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013), 박영사
  11. 박정기, "친족상속법" (2013), 도서출판 탑북스
  12. 송덕수, "친족상속법" (2018), 박영사
  13. 신영호, "가족법강의" (2018), 세창출판사
  14. 梁壽山, "親族·相續法" (1998), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
  15. 오병철, "과학적 부성(paternity) 도입을 통한 친자법의 개혁 -혼인 중의 자녀와 혼인 외의 자녀의 구분 철폐를 위하여-", 저스티스, 166, pp.166~208 (2018), 한국법학원[DOI]
  16. 윤진수, "친생추정에 관한 민법개정안", 가족법연구, 31(1), pp.1~26 (2017), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
  17. 윤진수, "친족상속법 강의" (2018), 박영사
  18. 2013년 개정 민법 해설, "윤진수", 법무부, ~ (2013)
  19. 이경희, "가족법" (2017), 法元社
  20. 이경희, "親生否認制度와 血緣眞實主義", 考試界, 50(11) (2006), 국가고시학회
  21. 이은정, "가족제도의 변호와 친자법 개정의 필요성", 법학논고, (33), pp.377~404 (2010), 법학연구원[DOI]
  22. 이은희, "부부공동입양―대법원 2001. 5. 24. 선고 2000므1493 판결", Juris forum, (2) (2001), 충북대학교
  23. 이준영, "임의인지에 의한 부자관계의 확정", 한양법학, (29), pp.605~630 (2010), 한양법학회
  24. 李濟正, "親子關係確認訴訟의 審理上 主要 論點", 裁判資料; 家庭法院事件의 諸問題, 101 (2003), 법원도서관
  25. 李和淑, "親生子推定과 親生否認의 訴", 司法行政, (376), pp.76~ (1992), 韓國司法行政學會
  26. 池元林, "民法講義" (2019), 弘文士
  27. 최문기, "친족·상속법" (2014), 세종출판사
  28. 최진섭, "입양에 관한 판례의 쟁점 분석", 법학연구, 21(3), pp.193~224 (2011), 법학연구원
  29. 윤진수, "주해친족법 제1권" (2015), 박영사
  30. 古山茂夫, "親族法注解" (1923), 酒井書店
  31. 高野竹三郞, "嫡出子をめぐる諸問題", 早稻田法學, 69(2) (1993), 早稻田大學法學會
  32. 山畠正男, "推定を受けない嫡出子に関する覚書 (五)", 判例評論, 203 (1976), 判例時報社
  33. 水野紀子, "認知無効について: 血緣上の親子關係と法律上の親子關係の不一致", 法學, 64(1) (2000), 東北帝國大學法學會
  34. 我妻榮, "親族法" (1961), 有斐閣
  35. 我妻榮, "親族法·相續法(法律學体系 コンメンタール 篇)" (1956), 日本評論社
  36. 奥田義人, "民法親族法論" (1898), 有斐閣
  37. 二宮周平, "家族法" (1999), 新世社
  38. 鈴木禄弥, "親族法講義" (1990), 創文社
  39. 鈴木禄弥, "木人事法" (1980), 有斐閣
  40. 仁井田益太郞, "親族法相續法論" (1915), 有斐閣
  41. 中川善之助, "新訂親族法" (1965), 靑林書院
  42. 中川善之助, "新版注釋民法(23) 親族(3)" (2011), 有斐閣
  43. 田村五郞, "家族法大系 Ⅳ" (1960), 有斐閣
  44. 和田于一, "親子法論" (1927), 大同書院

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)