본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등영어교육에서 창의·인성교육에 대한 인식변화 종적연구

A longitudinal study of perception change of the Creativity and Character education in elementary English education

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate the results of Creativity and Character (CnC) education as an English education policy in Korean primary schools for the last 3 years. The article also investigates whether or not the CnC education policy has been successful in terms of in-service teachers’ and students’ perception change. The study examines differences and similarities between the survey results of 2015 and 2018. The results establish the improvement of teachers’ perception of the necessity of CnC education and the belief in the feasibility of CnC education in primary school English classes. It also demonstrates that teachers elected ‘role play’ as the most utilized activity for creativity education in English classes, followed by ‘brainstorming,’ ‘association techniques,’ ‘project-based activities,’ ‘mind-map activities,’ and ‘problem-solving activities.’ For the implementation of character education, teachers used both ‘role play’ and ‘cooperative learning activities’ as the most utilized activities in English classes, followed by ‘games for teamwork,’ and ‘cultural activities.’ Based on the results, suggestions for further studies are provided.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the results of Creativity and Character (CnC) education as an English education policy in Korean primary schools for the last 3 years. The article also investigates whether or not the CnC education policy has been successful in terms of in-service teachers’ and students’ perception change. The study examines differences and similarities between the survey results of 2015 and 2018. The results establish the improvement of teachers’ perception of the necessity of CnC education and the belief in the feasibility of CnC education in primary school English classes. It also demonstrates that teachers elected ‘role play’ as the most utilized activity for creativity education in English classes, followed by ‘brainstorming,’ ‘association techniques,’ ‘project-based activities,’ ‘mind-map activities,’ and ‘problem-solving activities.’ For the implementation of character education, teachers used both ‘role play’ and ‘cooperative learning activities’ as the most utilized activities in English classes, followed by ‘games for teamwork,’ and ‘cultural activities.’ Based on the results, suggestions for further studies are provided.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 강선보, "21세기 인성교육의 방향설정을 위한 이론적 기초 연구", 교육문제연구, (30), pp.1~38 (2008), 교육문제연구소
  2. 강후동, "초등영어교육에서의 창의성·인성교육 현황분석", 초등영어교육, 18(3), pp.5~29 (2012), 한국초등영어교육학회
  3. 강후동, "초등영어교육을 위한 창의성·인성교육 효과 분석에 관한 연구", 초등영어교육, 18(1), pp.173~196 (2012), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
  4. 교육과학기술부, "2009 개정교육과정: 초·중등학교교육과정총론", 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2009-41호, ~ (2009)
  5. 창의와 배려의 조화를 통한 인재육성 창의·인성교육 기본방안, "교육과학기술부", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2009)
  6. "2011", ~
  7. "2015", ~
  8. 권영환, "초등영어교육에서 프로젝트 학습활동 개발을 통한 창의 인성교육 방안", 초등교육연구, 28, pp.105~123 (2013)
  9. 김영채, "창의적 문제해결" (1999), 교육과학사
  10. 김정신, "동화기반 낭송극 활동이 초등영어 학습자의 의사소통능력 및 창의·인성에 미치는 영향", 석사, 교육연극전공, pp.2013
  11. 김진석, "초등영어과 교육과정에서의 교수-학습 방법", 2012년 한국초등영어교육학회소식지 6월호, ~ (2012)
  12. 김혜련, "교사교육 프로그램을 통한 초등영어 창의성 교육에 대한 교사의 인식 변화", 초등영어교육, 23(4), pp.5~28 (2017), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
  13. 문용린, "창의 인성교육의 총론", 인하대학교 교육연구소 심포지움, pp.21~29 (2010)
  14. 교과교육과 창의적체험 활동을 통한 인성교육 활성화 방안, "이명준", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRC. 2011-7-1 (2011)
  15. 활동을 통한 인성교육 활성화 방안, , 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRC. 2011-7-1
  16. "2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등 영어과 교육과정의 이해", 2012년 한국초등영어교육학회소식지 6월호, ~ (2012)
  17. 이세진, "창의 ․ 인성 중심 초등영어교육에서 문화상호간 의사소통 접근법 적용에 관한 실행연구", Studies in English Education, 21(3), pp.83~114 (2016), 글로벌영어교육학회
  18. 임선하, "창의적 사고의 구조 – DESK 모형의 응용" (2001), 케이메트릭스
  19. 최준환, "인성교육의 문제점 및 창의·인성교육의 이론적 고찰", 창의력 교육연구, 9(2), pp.89~112 (2009)
  20. 한국교육과정평가원, "영어교육모델 창의경영학교 운영 매뉴얼", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (2012)
  21. Birkmaier, E., "The meaning of creativity in foreign language teaching", The Modern Language Journal, 55(6), pp.345~353 (1971)
  22. Carter, R., "Language and creativity: The art of common talk" (2004), Routledge
  23. Lubart, T. I., "Thinking and problem solving", pp.289~332 (1994), Academic Behavior
  24. Peterson, C., "Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification" (2004), Oxford University Press
  25. Sternberg, R. I., "The creative cognition approach", pp.271~302 (1995), MIT Press
  26. Taylor, C. W., "The nature of creativity", pp.99~121 (1988), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)