메리 셸리의 [최후의 인간]에 나타난 공감의 문제와 종에 대한 사유
Thought Experiment on Sympathy and Species in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Mary Shelley’s The Last Man published in 1826 tells a bleak story of the extinction of mankind by the plague from the perspective of the last man, Lionel Verney. This paper explores sympathy and mankind as a biological species in The Last Man, focusing on Verney and Adrian. As an orphan and outcast, Verney desires for human sympathy. His desire is satisfied when he is accepted into a civilized society through his friendship with Adrian. Unlike Verney, Adrian approaches sympathy in the broader context of community. He takes upon himself the task of helping others and wishes to make the earth a paradise for humans. But Adrian’s optimism for the future of mankind gets irrevocably destroyed at the outbreak of the plague. Sympathy turns out powerless against the invincible plague, although it is effective in resolving conflicts among humans. Now life is all that matters and all that everyone covets. The disaster of the plague clearly shows that humans are a biological being whose life depends on the organic mechanism of the body, not the lord of nature and other beings in it. As the continuity of mankind gets threatened, the fate of an individual human being becomes directly connected to the fate of mankind as a whole. Significantly, the plague wields its destructive power only upon humans. Nature remains fertile and abundant throughout the disaster of the plague, totally unaffected by the tragic annihilation of mankind. It leads us to think about the fact that mankind is one of many biological species in nature and to think about the puniness of mankind.
Abstract
Mary Shelley’s The Last Man published in 1826 tells a bleak story of the extinction of mankind by the plague from the perspective of the last man, Lionel Verney. This paper explores sympathy and mankind as a biological species in The Last Man, focusing on Verney and Adrian. As an orphan and outcast, Verney desires for human sympathy. His desire is satisfied when he is accepted into a civilized society through his friendship with Adrian. Unlike Verney, Adrian approaches sympathy in the broader context of community. He takes upon himself the task of helping others and wishes to make the earth a paradise for humans. But Adrian’s optimism for the future of mankind gets irrevocably destroyed at the outbreak of the plague. Sympathy turns out powerless against the invincible plague, although it is effective in resolving conflicts among humans. Now life is all that matters and all that everyone covets. The disaster of the plague clearly shows that humans are a biological being whose life depends on the organic mechanism of the body, not the lord of nature and other beings in it. As the continuity of mankind gets threatened, the fate of an individual human being becomes directly connected to the fate of mankind as a whole. Significantly, the plague wields its destructive power only upon humans. Nature remains fertile and abundant throughout the disaster of the plague, totally unaffected by the tragic annihilation of mankind. It leads us to think about the fact that mankind is one of many biological species in nature and to think about the puniness of mankind.
참고문헌 (17)
- 박미경, "메리 셸리의 『최후의 인간』에 재현된 공화주의와 전염병의 제국", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (32), pp.53~80 (2012), 영미문학연구회[DOI]
- 유선무, "메리 셸리의『최후의 인간』─역사 끝에 선 환대", 영어영문학, 58(1), pp.93~115 (2012), 한국영어영문학회[DOI]
- An, Young-ok, "‘Read Your Fall’: The Signs of Plague in The Last Man", Studies in Romanticism, 44(4), pp.581~604 (2005)
- Bailes, Melissa, "The Psychologization of Geological Catastrophe in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man", ELH, 82, pp.671~699 (2015)
- Cameron, Lauren, "Mary Shelley’s Malthusian Objection in The Last Man", Nineteenth-Century Literature, 67(2), pp.177~203 (2012)
- Chakrabarty, Dipesh, "The Climate of History: Four Theses", Critical Inquiry, 35(2), pp.197~222 (2009)
- Deren, Jennifer, "Revolting Sympathies in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man", Nineteenth-Century Literature, 72(2), pp.135~160 (2017)
- Haslanger, Andrea, "The Last Animal: Comsmopolitanism in The Last Man", European Romantic Review, 27(5), pp.659~678 (2016)
- Hoffman, A. Robin, "The Problem of Distance: Families and Land(s) in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man", Foundation, 104, pp.23~41 (2008)
- Johnson, Barbara, "A Life with Mary Shelley" (2014), Stanford UP
- Lokke, Kari E., "The Cambridge Companion to Mary shelley", pp.116~134 (2003), Cambridge UP
- Melville, Peter, "The Problem of Immunity in The Last Man", SEL, 47(4), pp.825~846 (2007)
- Paley, Morton D., "The Other Mary Shelley", pp.107~123 (1993), Oxford UP
- Ruppert, Timothy, "Time and the Sibyl in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man", Studies in the Novel, 41(2), pp.141~156 (2009)
- Shelley, Mary, "The Last Man" (1996), Broadview
- Snyder, Robert Lance, "Apocalypse and Indeterminacy in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man", Studies in Romanticism, 17(4), pp.435~452 (1978)
- Wang, Fuson, "We Must Live Elsewhere: The Social Construction of Natural Immunity in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man", European Romantic Review, 22(2), pp.235~255 (2011)