Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis with Conventional Aspiration Thrombectomy for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who had undergone a catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 74 patients (mean age 61 ± 15) that underwent a catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy. A retrieval inferior vena cava (IVC) filter was placed to protect against a pulmonary embolism in 60 patients (81%). Stenting and balloon angioplasty were performed in 37 patients (50%)under the left common iliac vein compression. Results: Sixty-seven patients (91%) showed a clinical improvement within 48 hours, but seven patients (9%) showed no improvement. Multi detector computerized tomographic venography (MDCT venography) at discharge showed no thrombus in 15 patients (20%) and partial thrombus in 52(70%). Twenty-eight patients (38%) developed post-thrombotic syndrome at 3.0 ± 4.2 months postoperatively. Six patients (8%) were admitted due to DVT recurrence at a mean of 5.6 ± 7.4 months postoperatively. Sixty-nine patients underwent follow up MDCT venography at 5.7 ± 5.6 months. fifty (72%) of these showed no thrombus, 15(22%) partial thrombus, and 4 (6%) showed obstruction. Twentyeight of 61 (46%) were asymptomatic, twentyeight (46%) had moderate improvement, and four (6%) were mildly improved by a telephone interview (81%) at 22.8 ±10.7 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy is an effective treatment for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and produces satisfactory clinical results.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who had undergone a catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 74 patients (mean age 61 ± 15) that underwent a catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy. A retrieval inferior vena cava (IVC) filter was placed to protect against a pulmonary embolism in 60 patients (81%). Stenting and balloon angioplasty were performed in 37 patients (50%)under the left common iliac vein compression. Results: Sixty-seven patients (91%) showed a clinical improvement within 48 hours, but seven patients (9%) showed no improvement. Multi detector computerized tomographic venography (MDCT venography) at discharge showed no thrombus in 15 patients (20%) and partial thrombus in 52(70%). Twenty-eight patients (38%) developed post-thrombotic syndrome at 3.0 ± 4.2 months postoperatively. Six patients (8%) were admitted due to DVT recurrence at a mean of 5.6 ± 7.4 months postoperatively. Sixty-nine patients underwent follow up MDCT venography at 5.7 ± 5.6 months. fifty (72%) of these showed no thrombus, 15(22%) partial thrombus, and 4 (6%) showed obstruction. Twentyeight of 61 (46%) were asymptomatic, twentyeight (46%) had moderate improvement, and four (6%) were mildly improved by a telephone interview (81%) at 22.8 ±10.7 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy is an effective treatment for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and produces satisfactory clinical results.
참고문헌 (16)
- Meissner MH, "Acute venous disease: venous thrombosis and venous trauma", J Vasc Surg, 46, pp.25S~53S (2007)
- Comerota AJ, "Iliofemoral venous thrombosis", J Vasc Surg, 46, pp.1065~1076 (2007)
- Comerota AJ, "Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: a strategy of thrombus removal", Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 33, pp.351~360 (2007)
- Plate G, "Long-term results of venous thrombectomy combined with a temporary arterio-venous fistula", Eur J Vasc Surg, 4, pp.483~489 (1990)
- Lin PH, "Catheter-direct thrombolysis versus pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis", Am J Surg, 192, pp.782~788 (2006)
- Nordström M, "A prospective study of the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis within a defined urban population", J Intern Med, 232, pp.155~160 (1992)
- Anderson FA Jr, "A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study", Arch Intern Med, 151, pp.933~938 (1991)
- Husmann MJ, "Stenting of common iliac vein obstructions combined with regional thrombolysis and thrombectomy in acute deep vein thrombosis", Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 34, pp.87~91 (2007)
- Kölbel T, "Extensive acute deep vein thrombosis of the iliocaval segment:midterm results of thrombolysis and stent placement", J Vasc Interv Radiol, 18, pp.243~250 (2007)
- Mewissen MW, "Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry", Radiology, 211, pp.39~49 (1999)
- Verhaeghe R, "Catheter-directed lysis of iliofemoral vein thrombosis with use of rt-PA", Eur Radiol, 7, pp.996~1001 (1997)
- Berry RE, "Free-floating deep venous thrombosis. A retrospective analysis", Ann Surg, 211, pp.719~722 (1990)
- Beyth RJ, "Long-term outcomes of deep-vein thrombosis", Arch Intern Med, 155, pp.1031~1037 (1995)
- Monreal M, "Venographic assessment of deep vein thrombosis and risk of developing post-thrombotic syndrome: a prospective study", J Intern Med, 233, pp.233~238 (1993)
- Johnson BF, "Relationship between changes in the deep venous system and the development of the postthrombotic syndrome after an acute episode of lower limb deep vein thrombosis: a one- to six-year follow-up", J Vasc Surg, 21, pp.307~312 (1995)
- Rhodes JM, "Thrombolysis for experimental deep venous thrombosis maintains valvular competence and vasoreactivity", J Vasc Surg, 31, pp.1193~1205 (2000)
