Why Biological Psychiatry Hasn’t Delivered Yet – and Why Neurology Knows
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is increasingly recognized that neuroscience has not delivered the revolutionary clinical possibilities for psychiatry that had been promised. Explanations differ, however: some proponents emphasize the divide between biopsychosocial psychiatry and mechanistic neurology. Others rely on further basic experimental neuroscience as only the most elementary level of explanation will allow us to fully understand and treat mental disorders. From a clinical-neuropsychological perspective, I shall argue that both views are mistaken. Diagnosis and treatment of neurological diseases demands a biopsychosocial perspective similar to psychiatry. Acknowledging this might help to bring both disciplines together and improve clinical outcome.
Abstract
It is increasingly recognized that neuroscience has not delivered the revolutionary clinical possibilities for psychiatry that had been promised. Explanations differ, however: some proponents emphasize the divide between biopsychosocial psychiatry and mechanistic neurology. Others rely on further basic experimental neuroscience as only the most elementary level of explanation will allow us to fully understand and treat mental disorders. From a clinical-neuropsychological perspective, I shall argue that both views are mistaken. Diagnosis and treatment of neurological diseases demands a biopsychosocial perspective similar to psychiatry. Acknowledging this might help to bring both disciplines together and improve clinical outcome.
참고문헌 (16)
- Kingdon D, "Why hasn’t neuroscience delivered for psychiatry?", BJPsych Bull, 44, pp.107~109 (2020)
- Graham G, "The Disordered Mind" (2013), Routledge
- Insel TR, "Twenty-five years of progress : The view from NIMH and NINDS", Neuron, 80, pp.561~567 (2013)
- Frisch S, "How cognitive neuroscience could be more biological—and what it might learn from clinical neuropsychology", Front Hum Neurosci, 8, pp.1~13 (2014)
- Frisch S, "The tangled knots of neuroscientific experimentation", Integr Psych Behav Sci (2021)
- Frisch S, "Are mental disorders brain diseases, and what does this mean? A clinical-neuropsychological perspective", Psychopathology, 49, pp.135~142 (2016)
- Hobson JA, "Out of Its Mind: Psychiatry in Crisis a Call for Reform" (2001), Perseus Books
- Raese J, "The pernicious effect of mind", body dualism in psychiatry, 2015, pp.18, 1~7
- Moreira-Almeida A, "The presentation of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals", Braz J Psychiatry, 40, pp.335~342 (2018)
- Ng C, "Is mind–body dualism compatible with modern psychiatry?", BJPsych Advances, pp.1~3 (2021)
- Sinclair LI, "What neuroscience has already done for us", BJPsych Bull, 44, pp.110~112 (2020)
- Witek NP, "Placebo Effects in Neurologic Disease Preface" (2020), Academic Press
- Carson AJ, "Neurological disease, emotional disorder, and disability : they are related : a study of 300 consecutive new referrals to a neurology outpatient department", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 68, pp.202~206 (2000)
- Reilly TJ, "The neurology–psychiatry divide : a thought experiment", BJPsych Bull, 39, pp.134~135 (2015)
- Engel GL, "The need for a new medical model : a challenge for biomedicine", Science, 196, pp.129~136 (1977)
- Kendler K, "What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders?", Psychol Med, 41, pp.1143~1150 (2011)