본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcomes of Modified Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy and Mastoid Obliteration Using Autologous Materials

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. The traditional canal wall down mastoidectomy (CWDM) procedure commonly has potential problems of altering the anatomy and physiology of the middle ear and mastoid. This study evaluated outcomes in patients who underwent modified canal wall down mastoidectomy (mCWDM) and mastoid obliteration using autologous materials. Methods. Our study included 76 patients with chronic otitis media, cholesteatoma, and adhesive otitis who underwent mCWDM and mastoid obliteration using autologous materials between 2010 and 2015. Postoperative hearing air-bone gap and complications were evaluated. Results. During the average follow-up of 64 months (range, 20 to 89 months), there was no recurrent or residual cholesteatoma or chronic otitis media. No patient had a cavity problem and anatomic integrity of the posterior canal wall was obtained. There was a significant improvement in hearing with respect to the postoperative air-bone gap (P<0.05). A retroauricular skin depression was a common complication of this technique. Conclusion. The present study suggests that our technique can prevent various complications of the classical CWDM technique using autologous tissues for mastoid cavity obliteration. It is also an appropriate method to obtain adequate volume for safe obliteration.

Abstract

Objectives. The traditional canal wall down mastoidectomy (CWDM) procedure commonly has potential problems of altering the anatomy and physiology of the middle ear and mastoid. This study evaluated outcomes in patients who underwent modified canal wall down mastoidectomy (mCWDM) and mastoid obliteration using autologous materials. Methods. Our study included 76 patients with chronic otitis media, cholesteatoma, and adhesive otitis who underwent mCWDM and mastoid obliteration using autologous materials between 2010 and 2015. Postoperative hearing air-bone gap and complications were evaluated. Results. During the average follow-up of 64 months (range, 20 to 89 months), there was no recurrent or residual cholesteatoma or chronic otitis media. No patient had a cavity problem and anatomic integrity of the posterior canal wall was obtained. There was a significant improvement in hearing with respect to the postoperative air-bone gap (P<0.05). A retroauricular skin depression was a common complication of this technique. Conclusion. The present study suggests that our technique can prevent various complications of the classical CWDM technique using autologous tissues for mastoid cavity obliteration. It is also an appropriate method to obtain adequate volume for safe obliteration.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Karmarkar S, "Cholesteatoma surgery : the individualized technique", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 104(8), pp.591~595 (1995)
  2. Charachon R, "Closed versus obliteration technique in cholesteatoma surgery", Am J Otol, 9(4), pp.286~292 (1988)
  3. Brown JS, "A ten year statistical follow-up of 1142 consecutive cases of cholesteatoma: the closed vs. the open technique", Laryngoscope, 92(4), pp.390~396 (1982)
  4. Palmgren O, "Long-term results of open cavity and tympanomastoid surgery of the chronic ear", Acta Otolaryngol, 88(5-6), pp.343~349 (1979)
  5. Sade J, "The marsupialized(radical)mastoid", J Laryngol Otol, 96(10), pp.869~875 (1982)
  6. Smyth GD, "Canal wall for cholesteatoma : up or down? Long-term results", Am J Otol, 6(1), pp.1~2 (1985)
  7. Palva T, "Ear surgery and mastoid air cell system", Arch Otolaryngol, 107(2), pp.71~73 (1981)
  8. Lopez Villarejo P, "The antrum exclusion technique in cholesteatoma surgery", J Laryngol Otol, 106(2), pp.120~123 (1992)
  9. Yanagihara N, "Prevention of recurrence of cholesteatoma in intact canal wall tympanoplasty", Am J Otol, 14(6), pp.590~594 (1993)
  10. Palva T, "Operative technique in mastoid obliteration", Acta Otolaryngol, 75(4), pp.289~290 (1973)
  11. Gantz BJ, "Canal wall reconstruction tympanomastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration", Laryngoscope, 115(10), pp.1734~1740 (2005)
  12. Lee WS, "Mastoid and epitympanic obliteration in canal wall up mastoidectomy for prevention of retraction pocket", Otol Neurotol, 26(6), pp.1107~1111 (2005)
  13. Black B, "Mastoidectomy elimination: obliterate, reconstruct, or ablate?", Am J Otol, 19(5), pp.551~557 (1998)
  14. Dornhoffer JL, "Surgical modification of the difficult mastoid cavity", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 120(3), pp.361~367 (1999)
  15. Roche P, "Autologous bone pate in middle ear and mastoid reconstruction", Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord), 132(4-5), pp.193~196 (2011)
  16. Grote JJ, "Results of cavity reconstruction with hydroxyapatite implants after 15 years", Am J Otol, 19(5), pp.565~568 (1998)
  17. "Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 113(3), pp.186~187 (1995)
  18. Moffat DA, "Mastoid obliteration using bone pate", Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 19(2), pp.149~157 (1994)
  19. Roberson JB Jr, "Mastoid obliteration : autogenous cranial bone pAte reconstruction", Otol Neurotol, 24(2), pp.132~140 (2003)
  20. Lee WS, "Canal wall reconstruction and mastoid obliteration in canal wall down tympanomastoidectomized patients", Acta Otolaryngol, 129(9), pp.955~961 (2009)
  21. Wiet RJ, "Canal wall reconstruction : a newer implantation technique", Laryngoscope, 103(6), pp.594~599 (1993)
  22. Ikeda M, "Canal wall down tympanoplasty with canal reconstruction for middle-ear cholesteatoma : postoperative hearing, cholesteatoma recurrence, and status of re-aeration of reconstructed middle-ear cavity", J Laryngol Otol, 117(4), pp.249~255 (2003)
  23. Linthicum FH Jr, "The fate of mastoid obliteration tissue : a histopathological study", Laryngoscope, 112(10), pp.1777~1781 (2002)
  24. Minatogawa T, "Evaluation of mastoid obliteration surgery", Am J Otol, 16(1), pp.99~103 (1995)
  25. Ridenour JS, "Complications with hydroxyapatite cement in mastoid cavity obliteration", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 139(5), pp.641~645 (2008)
  26. Cody DT, "Mastoidectomy for acquired cholesteatoma : follow-up to 20 years", Laryngoscope, 94(8), pp.1027~1030 (1984)
  27. Austin DF, "Staging in cholesteatoma surgery", J Laryngol Otol, 103(2), pp.143~148 (1989)
  28. Aarts MC, "The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in detecting a residual cholesteatoma", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 143(1), pp.12~16 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

Obliteration of Radical Cavities and Total Reconstruction Procedure Without Staging After Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy: Long-term ResultsBor-Rong Huang, Chih-Hung Wang, Shao-Cheng Liu대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2015 · 제8권 제3호Hearing Outcomes According to the Types of Mastoidectomy: A Comparison between Canal Wall Up and Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy김민범, 박주연, 이재권, 장원호, 조양선, 최지선, 추호석, 홍성화대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2010 · 제3권 제4호Usefulness of Anterior-Based Periosteal (Palva) Flap for Obliteration of Mastoid Cavity in Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy공수근, 오세준, 이석환, 이현정, 최성원대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2019 · 제30권 제2호Is Ossiculoplasty Necessary in Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy? Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Type 0 Tympanoplasty and OssiculoplastyPark Jin-A, Song Chan Il, Suh Michelle J., Yi Hee Jun대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2021 · 제25권 제2호Mastoid Obliteration with Silicone Blocks after Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy조성우, 조용범, 조형호대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2012 · 제5권 제1호Safety and Effectiveness of Bone Allografts for Mastoid Obliteration After Mastoidectomy: A Pilot Study김우진, 박성율, Heo Kyung Wook, Hong Tae Ui, Park Chanhyeon, Sim Soohyun대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2024 · 제28권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)