임상실습 평가방법으로서의 RIME 모형
The Rime Model as an Evaluation Method in the Clinical Clerkship
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
There is a need for clinical performance evaluation methods that are reliable, valid and feasible. The Uniformed Services University of Health Science (USUHS) has been used the RIME (Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator) model for 18 years in the clinical clerkship. They described the progress of students' performance during the 12-week internal medicine clerkship using the RIME framework. And formal evaluation sessions and feedback sessions that were scheduled every 3, 4 weeks through the 12-week of internal medicine clerkship significantly improved the detection rate of students with marginal fund of knowledge, compared with the global numeric rating or written comments. This method provided a rapid feedback to students on their performances during the clerkship, and it also gave faculty feedback on their evaluations. Although previous studies had some limitations in terms of study design, many studies showed that this was a reliable, valid, and feasible "real-time" clinical assessment tool. However, it is necessary to use the multiple-choice test and OSCE in addition to RIME model for overall evaluation.
참고문헌 (14)
- "외과학 임상 실습 평가방법의 변경이 실습 성적에 미치는 영향", 15, pp.221~231 (2003)
- "임상의학입문 평가를 위한 객관적임상실기시험 경험", 13, pp.289~298 (2001)
- "의학과 4학년 종합평가로서의 객관적-구조적 임상능력 평가의 경험", 10, pp.43~56 (1998)
- "객관적으로 구조화된 임상시험의 시행 경험", 10, pp.363~381 (1998)
- ". 의과대학 임상 실습 개선에 대한 연구.한국의학교육", pp.34~40 (1993)
- ". Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric rating in detecting student's progress during the inpatient portion of an Internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med" (2001)
- "The feasibility and acceptability of implementing formal evaluation sessions and using descriptive vocabulary to assess student performance on a clinical clerkship", 14(5), pp.5~10 (2002)
- "The Effectiveness of Formal Evaluation Sessions during clinical clerkships in better identifying students with marginal funds of knowledge", 72, pp.641~643 (1997)
- "Assessing How Well Three Evaluation Methods detect deficiencies in Medical Students' professionalism in two settings of an IM clerkship", 75, pp.1667~173 (2000)
- ". Subjective vs. objective evaluation of clinical clerkship. N Eng J Med", pp.1036~1037 (1980)
- ". A system for evaluating and counseling marginal students during clinical clerkship. J Med Educ", pp.353~355 (1987)
- ". Evaluation of medical students during a clinical clerkship in internal medicine. J Med Educ", o'do(hue wj), pp.55~58 (1978)
- "A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluation", 74, pp.1203~1207 (1999)
- "Investing in descriptive evaluation a vision for the future of assessment", 22, pp.478~481 (2000)