본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Different Reactions to Deviant Group Members in the Public Goods Dilemma

김보라
한국코칭심리학회 (Korean Coaching Psychological Association)|2019.12|한국심리학회지: 코칭 (Korean Journal of Coaching Psychology)|제3권 제2호|pp. 41-63

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

이익충돌social exclusionconflicts of interest사회적 배제selfishunselfishpublic goods dilemmagroup competition이기적이타적공공재 딜레마집단 경쟁

초록

There have been contradictory findings concerning our attitude toward deviant group members; some argue that pro-norm deviants are preferred to anti-norm deviants (e.g., Abrams et al., 2000); others propose that any type of deviant is negatively evaluated to be the target of expulsion (e.g., Parks & Stone, 2010). This article argues that group task conditions could cause these conflicting findings. Employing a revised intergroup public goods dilemma game, this study found that people were willing to expel a selfish member (an anti-norm deviant) even by sacrificing their own income when the deviant’s actions seriously deteriorated the group performance as well as their personal performance. By contrast, people hoped to retain an altruistic member (a pro-norm deviant) as the deviant’s behavior was beneficial to them and had a positive influence on team morale. The intention to expel a selfish member became stronger when an altruistic member being in the same group than when no altruistic person being in the group. Results suggest that conflicts of interests as a group task feature can be a critical factor to influence people’s judgment and reaction to pro-norm and anti-norm deviants.

Abstract

There have been contradictory findings concerning our attitude toward deviant group members; some argue that pro-norm deviants are preferred to anti-norm deviants (e.g., Abrams et al., 2000); others propose that any type of deviant is negatively evaluated to be the target of expulsion (e.g., Parks & Stone, 2010). This article argues that group task conditions could cause these conflicting findings. Employing a revised intergroup public goods dilemma game, this study found that people were willing to expel a selfish member (an anti-norm deviant) even by sacrificing their own income when the deviant’s actions seriously deteriorated the group performance as well as their personal performance. By contrast, people hoped to retain an altruistic member (a pro-norm deviant) as the deviant’s behavior was beneficial to them and had a positive influence on team morale. The intention to expel a selfish member became stronger when an altruistic member being in the same group than when no altruistic person being in the group. Results suggest that conflicts of interests as a group task feature can be a critical factor to influence people’s judgment and reaction to pro-norm and anti-norm deviants.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Abrams, D., "Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus : Two experiments on subjective group dynamics", Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5(2), pp.163~182 (2002)
  2. Dominic Abrams, "Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), pp.906~912 (2000), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  3. Dominic Abrams, "Older but wilier: In-group accountability and the development of subjective group dynamics.", Developmental Psychology, 43(1), pp.134~148 (2007), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  4. Asch, S. E., "Groups, leadership and men", pp.177~190 (1951), Carnegie Press
  5. Au, W. T., "Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas", pp.71~98 (2004), Cambridge University Press
  6. Donna L. Bahry, "Confusion or fairness in the field? Rejections in the ultimatum game under the strategy method", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(1), pp.37~54 (2006), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Balliet, D., "Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas : A meta-analysis", Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(4), pp.533~547 (2009)
  8. Daniel Balliet, "Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis.", Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), pp.1556~1581 (2014), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  9. Gary Bornstein, "The free-rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), pp.597~606 (1992), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  10. Gary Bornstein, "Cooperation in Intergroup and Single-Group Social Dilemmas", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(1), pp.52~67 (1994), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  11. Gary Bornstein, "The Effect of Repeated Play in the IPG and IPD Team Games", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(4), pp.690~707 (1994), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  12. Gary Bornstein, "The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: an experimental study", Games and Economic Behavior, 41(1), pp.1~25 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  13. Arnold H. Buss, "The Aggression Questionnaire.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), pp.452~459 (1992), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  14. Monika Czerwonka, "Cultural, cognitive and personality traits in risk-taking behaviour: evidence from Poland and the United States of America", Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), pp.894~908 (2019), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  15. Morton Deutsch, "A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.", The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), pp.629~636 (1955), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  16. Kathy T. Do, "But is helping you worth the risk? Defining Prosocial Risk Taking in adolescence", Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, pp.260~271 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  17. Ernst Fehr, "Altruistic punishment in humans", Nature, 415(6868), pp.137~140 (2002), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  18. Ernst Fehr, "Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment (reply)", Nature, 433(7021), pp.E1~E2 (2005), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  19. Anna Gunnthorsdottir, "Embedding social dilemmas in intergroup competition reduces free-riding", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), pp.184~199 (2006), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  20. Heike Hennig-Schmidt, "Why people reject advantageous offers—Non-monotonic strategies in ultimatum bargaining", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(2), pp.373~384 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  21. B. Herrmann, "Antisocial Punishment Across Societies", Science, 319(5868), pp.1362~1367 (2008), American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)[DOI]
  22. Kyle Irwin, "A normative explanation of antisocial punishment", Social Science Research, 42(2), pp.562~570 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  23. John, O. P., "Handbook of personality: Theory and research", pp.102~138 (1999), Guilford Press
  24. Norbert L. Kerr, "“How many bad apples does it take to spoil the whole barrel?”: Social exclusion and toleration for bad apples", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), pp.603~613 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  25. Reuben Kline, "Personality and Prosocial Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis", Political Science Research and Methods, 7(1), pp.125~142 (2019), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  26. Isaac Lipkus, "The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale", Personality and Individual Differences, 12(11), pp.1171~1178 (1991), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  27. José Marques, "The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), pp.976~988 (1998), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  28. Ronnie L. McGhee, "The Relation between Five-Factor Personality Traits and Risk-Taking Behavior in Preadolescents", Psychology, 03(08), pp.558~561 (2012), Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.[DOI]
  29. Saaid A. Mendoza, "For Members Only", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), pp.662~670 (2014), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  30. Benoît Monin, "The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), pp.76~93 (2008), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  31. Murphy, R. O., "Measuring social value orientation", Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), pp.771~781 (2011)
  32. Nigel Nicholson, "Personality and domain‐specific risk taking", Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), pp.157~176 (2006), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  33. Craig D. Parks, "The desire to expel unselfish members from the group.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), pp.303~310 (2010), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  34. Amnon Rapoport, "Intergroup competition for public goods: Effects of unequal resources and relative group size.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), pp.748~756 (1989), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  35. Stephan, W. G., "Reducing prejudice and discrimination", pp.23~45 (2000), Psychology Press
  36. Arber Tasimi, "Do-gooder derogation in children: the social costs of generosity", Frontiers in Psychology, 6 (2015), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  37. Romy van der Lee, "In or out? How the perceived morality (vs. competence) of prospective group members affects acceptance and rejection", European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), pp.748~762 (2017), Wiley[DOI]
  38. Eric van Dijk, "Promoting cooperation in social dilemmas: the use of sanctions", Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, pp.118~122 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

조합원 되기: 사회적 배제 위기와 친사회적 행동김신우, 이형철, 조준형한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2024 · 제27권 제2호도덕 판단에서 나타나는 내-외집단 차이: 위반 주체 소속집단과 위반 장소의 효과설선혜, 이승민한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2019 · 제33권 제1호I CAN stand this, but WE CAN’T: discontinuity between choices for self vs. group modulated by group competition during the ultimatum game김학진, 김혜영, 한상훈한국인지과학회 · 인지과학2016 · 제27권 제3호An Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Payoff Mechanisms on a Finitely Repeated Social Dilemma Game이진권지암남덕우경제연구원 · 시장경제연구2025 · 제54권 제1호불평등에 대한 능력주의 귀인과 집단 정체성이 공공재 게임 실험에서 협력 행동에 미치는 효과김재우, 천거양사회과학연구소 · 지역과 세계2022 · 제46권 제4호Peer Pressure with Inequity Aversion이민환, 최강식, 한재준한국경제학회 · The Korean Economic Review2018 · 제34권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)

Relationships between Job Dissatisfaction and Emotional Exhaustion among Nurses: Personality as a Moderator*이승미, 박형인pp. 1-16경력 기반 역량분석 코칭프로그램이 경력정체성과 경력계획에 미치는 효과김은정, 탁진국pp. 17-39
원문 보기