수반성 판단에서 자기해석이 조건부화와 절감효과에 미치는 영향
The Influence of Self-Construal on Conditionalization and Discounting Effect in Contingency Judgment
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
원인과 결과 간의 연결 강도에 관한 추정인 인과 추론에는 다수의 처리기제가 다른 처리 시점에 관여하며 따라서 이들 각각에 민감하게 작용하는 개인차 변인은 상이할 가능성이 크다. 특히, 조건부화와 절감 현상은 하나의 결과에 다수의 잠재 원인이 존재할 경우 특정 원인과 결과 간의 인과 강도를 추정할 때 일어나는 주요 현상에 해당한다. 본 연구에서는 맥락 민감도와 관련된 개인차 변인인 자기 해석을 조작하여 조건부화와 절감 현상에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가를 알아보았다. 그 결과 독립적 자기 조건과 상호의존적 자기 조건 간에는 조건부화 정도의 차이가 발견되지 않았다. 그러나 상호의존적 자기 조건이 더 높은 절감 현상을 보였으며 이는 조건부화와 절감 현상이 각기 다른 처리 기제임을 시사한다고 볼 수 있다.
Abstract
There are multiple process mechanism in causal reasoning, which is estimation of the causal strength between cause and result. Further, because these mechanisms operate on different time phase during causal reasoning, it is highly possible that different individual difference factors are related to individual mechanisms of causal reasoning. Especially, the phenomena of conditionalization and discounting reflect attention to multiple potential causes when people infer the relationship between cause and effect. In this study, we manipulated self-construal which is an individual difference factor that reflects context sensitivity in cognition. As results, no difference was observed in conditionalization between individuals with an independent self-construal and those with an interdependent self- construal. However, independent self-construal group was observed to be lower in discounting than the interdependent self-construal group. The results indicate that conditionalization and discounting are independent cognitive process in human causal reasoning.
참고문헌 (15)
- Wasserman, E. A., "Perception of causal relations in humans: Factors affecting judgments of response-outcome contingencies under free-operant procedures", Learning and Motivation, 14, pp.406~432 (1983)
- Kim, K., "Self-construal and the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning", Memory & Cognition, 35(6), pp.1337~1343 (2007)
- Cheng, P. W., "From covariation to causation: A causal power theory", Psychological Review, 104, pp.367~405 (1997)
- Spellman, B. A., "Acting as intuitive scientists: Contingency Judgments Are Made While Controlling for Alternative Potential Causes", Psychological Science, 7(6), pp.337~342 (1996)
- Baker, A. G., "Selective associations and causality judgments: The presence of a strong causal factor may reduce judgments of a weaker one", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, pp.414~432 (1993)
- Spellman, B. A., "How two causes are different from one: The use of (un)conditional information in Simpson’s paradox", Memory & Cognition, 29, pp.193~208 (2001)
- Markus, H., "Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation", Psychological Review, 98, pp.224~253 (1991)
- Hardin, E. E., "Factor structure of the Self-Construal Scale: Implications for the multi-dimensionality of self-construal", Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 35, pp.327~345 (2004)
- Laux, J. P., "Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias", Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(2), pp.213~218 (2010)
- Gardner, W. L., "“I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment", Psychological Science, 10, pp.321~306 (1999)
- Kuhn, M. H., "An empirical investigation of self-attitudes", American Sociological Review, 19, pp.69~76 (1954)
- Sobel, M. E., "Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models, In Sociological methodology", pp.390~312 (1982), Jossey-Bass
- 김경일, "인과추론의 개별 요소에 대한 개인차 변인의 상관 탐색 연구", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 12(4), pp.2135~2146 (2010), 한국자료분석학회
- Levine, T. R., "Self-construal scales lack validity", Human Communication Research, 29, pp.210~252 (2003)
- Allan, L. G., "A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks", Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, pp.147~149 (1980)