본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Children’s Hepatic Tumors International Collaboration-Hepatoblastoma Stratification (CHIC-HS) System for Pediatric Patients with Hepatoblastoma: A Retrospective, Hospital-Based Cohort Study in South Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: In 2017, the Children's Hepatic Tumors International Collaboration-Hepatoblastoma Stratification (CHIC-HS) system was introduced. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CHIC-HS System for the prediction of event-free survival (EFS) in Korean pediatric patients with hepatoblastoma. Materials and methods: This two-center retrospective study included consecutive Korean pediatric patients with histopathologically confirmed hepatoblastoma from March 1988 through September 2019. We compared EFS among four risk groups according to the CHIC-HS system. Discriminatory ability of CHIC-HS system was also evaluated using optimism-corrected C-statistics. Factors associated with EFS were explored using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: We included 129 patients (mean age, 2.6±3.3 years; female:male, 63:66). The 5-year EFS rates in the very low, low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, according to the CHIC-HS system were 90.0%, 82.8%, 73.5%, and 51.3%, respectively. The CHIC-HS system aligned significantly well with EFS outcomes (p=0.004). The optimism-corrected C index of CHIC-HS was 0.644 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.561 to 0.727). Age ≥ 8 (vs. age ≤ 2; hazard ratio [HR], 2.781; 95% CI, 1.187 to 6.512; p=0.018), PRE-Treatment EXTent of tumor (PRETEXT) stage IV (vs. PRETEXT I or II; HR, 2.774; 95% CI, 1.228 to 5.974; p=0.009), and presence of metastasis (HR, 2.886; 95% CI, 1.457 to 5.719; p=0.002), which are incorporated as the first three nodes in the CHIC-HS system, were independently associated with EFS. Conclusion: The CHIC-HS system aligned significantly well with EFS outcomes in Korean pediatric patients with hepatoblastoma. Age group, PRETEXT stage, and presence of metastasis were independently associated with EFS.

Abstract

Purpose: In 2017, the Children's Hepatic Tumors International Collaboration-Hepatoblastoma Stratification (CHIC-HS) system was introduced. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CHIC-HS System for the prediction of event-free survival (EFS) in Korean pediatric patients with hepatoblastoma. Materials and methods: This two-center retrospective study included consecutive Korean pediatric patients with histopathologically confirmed hepatoblastoma from March 1988 through September 2019. We compared EFS among four risk groups according to the CHIC-HS system. Discriminatory ability of CHIC-HS system was also evaluated using optimism-corrected C-statistics. Factors associated with EFS were explored using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: We included 129 patients (mean age, 2.6±3.3 years; female:male, 63:66). The 5-year EFS rates in the very low, low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, according to the CHIC-HS system were 90.0%, 82.8%, 73.5%, and 51.3%, respectively. The CHIC-HS system aligned significantly well with EFS outcomes (p=0.004). The optimism-corrected C index of CHIC-HS was 0.644 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.561 to 0.727). Age ≥ 8 (vs. age ≤ 2; hazard ratio [HR], 2.781; 95% CI, 1.187 to 6.512; p=0.018), PRE-Treatment EXTent of tumor (PRETEXT) stage IV (vs. PRETEXT I or II; HR, 2.774; 95% CI, 1.228 to 5.974; p=0.009), and presence of metastasis (HR, 2.886; 95% CI, 1.457 to 5.719; p=0.002), which are incorporated as the first three nodes in the CHIC-HS system, were independently associated with EFS. Conclusion: The CHIC-HS system aligned significantly well with EFS outcomes in Korean pediatric patients with hepatoblastoma. Age group, PRETEXT stage, and presence of metastasis were independently associated with EFS.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Ranganathan S, "Hepatoblastoma and pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma : an update", Pediatr Dev Pathol, 23, pp.79~95 (2020)
  2. Carceller A, "Surgical resection and chemotherapy improve survival rate for patients with hepatoblastoma", J Pediatr Surg, 36, pp.755~759 (2001)
  3. Czauderna P, "Hepatoblastoma state of the art : pathology, genetics, risk stratification, and chemotherapy", Curr Opin Pediatr, 26, pp.19~28 (2014)
  4. Perilongo G, "Cisplatin versus cisplatin plus doxorubicin for standard-risk hepatoblastoma", N Engl J Med, 361, pp.1662~1670 (2009)
  5. Hiyama E, "Outcome and late complications of hepatoblastomas treated using the Japanese Study Group for Pediatric Liver Tumor 2 Protocol", J Clin Oncol, 38, pp.2488~2498 (2020)
  6. Haberle B, "High dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in hepatoblastoma does not improve outcome : results of the GPOH Study HB99", Klin Padiatr, 231, pp.283~290 (2019)
  7. Meyers RL, "Hepatoblastoma state of the art : pre-treatment extent of disease, surgical resection guidelines and the role of liver transplantation", Curr Opin Pediatr, 26, pp.29~36 (2014)
  8. Perilongo G, "Hepatoblastoma clinical research : lessons learned and future challenges", Pediatr Blood Cancer, 59, pp.818~821 (2012)
  9. Meyers RL, "Risk-stratified staging in paediatric hepatoblastoma : a unified analysis from the Children’s Hepatic tumors International Collaboration", Lancet Oncol, 18, pp.122~131 (2017)
  10. von Elm E, "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology(STROBE)statement : guidelines for reporting observational studies", BMJ, 335, pp.806~808 (2007)
  11. Eisenhauer EA, "New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)", Eur J Cancer, 45, pp.228~247 (2009)
  12. Kang L, "Comparing two correlated C indices with right-censored survival outcome : a one-shot nonparametric approach", Stat Med, 34, pp.685~703 (2015)
  13. Wong MC, "The discriminatory capability of existing scores to predict advanced colorectal neoplasia : a prospective colonoscopy study of 5, 899 screening participants", Sci Rep, 6, pp.20080~ (2016)
  14. Czauderna P, "The Children’s Hepatic tumors International Collaboration(CHIC) : Novel global rare tumor database yields new prognostic factors in hepatoblastoma and becomes a research model", Eur J Cancer, 52, pp.92~101 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

Prognostic Value of POST-Treatment Extent of Tumor (POSTTEXT) System in Patients with Hepatoblastoma고경남, 김평화, 윤희망, 이진성, 정아영, 정하나, 조영아, 남궁정만대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2025 · 제57권 제4호Clinical Implication of Surgically treated Abdominoperineal Soild Tumor in the Newborn : A Single-Center Experience김해영, 변신연, 조용훈, Kyung Hee Park, Mi Hye Bae, Na Rae Lee, Soo-Hong Kim, Young Mi Han대한신생아학회 · Neonatal medicine2018 · 제25권 제1호Initial Response to Treatment was Highly Associated with the Prognosis of Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single Center Experience in Korea강형진, 김은경, 김일한, 박정아, 신희영, 안효섭대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2008 · 제40권 제3호Epidemiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Renal Tumors in Korea: A Retrospective Analysis of The Korean Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Group (KPHOG) Data국훈, 조빈, 강성한, 강형진, 고경남, 구홍회, 김성구, 김순기, 김지윤, 김혜리, 김효선, 마영은, 박경덕, 박경미, 박미림, 박병규, 박상규, 박은실, 박준은, 박현진, 백희조, 성기웅, 심예지, 양유진, 원승현, 유건희, 유경하, 유은선, 유재원, 유철주, 윤회수, 이미정, 이재민, 이재욱, 이준아, 이지원, 임연정, 임영탁, 임호준, 전인상, 정낙균, 정혜림, 최정윤, 최형수, 최희원, 한승민, 한정우, 홍경택, The Korean Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Group (KPHOG)대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2023 · 제55권 제1호Pediatric Adenocarcinoma in Korea: A Multicenter Study김기훈, 김대연, 김현영, 박진영, 신현백, 양희범, 윤중기, 이상훈, 이지원, 정성은, 정재희, 최윤미, 허태길, 호인걸, 남궁정만대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제1호Loss of Heterozygosity at Chromosome 16q Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Korean Pediatric Patients with Favorable Histology Wilms Tumor: A Report of the Korean Pediatric Hematology Oncology Group (K-PHOG)구홍회, 노오규, 류철주, 박준은, 성기웅, 유건희, 이용희, 이지원, 정선용, 최형수, 한승민, 한정우대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)

Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and the Molecular Tumor Board for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Report from KSMO and KCSG Precision Medicine Networking Group김효송, 천재경, 임선민, 윤지나, 장대영, 차용준, 강진형, 박인근, 이인희, 김한상, 홍용상, 장세진, 윤홍석, 안희경, 윤신교, 김태원, 유창훈, 김인호, 김지현, 김진원, 김지훈, 김승태, 김미소, 정재호pp. 1-9Validation of the Korean Version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 Profile V2.1 among Cancer Survivors윤정희, 임지현, 조주희, 남희수, 이만경, 복혜숙, 이상원, 김수연, 강은지, 안진석, 오동렬, 신수용, 김영하, 강단비, 심성근pp. 10-19Analysis of Cancer Patient Decision-Making and Health Service Utilization after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act in Korea김달용, Dae Seog Heo, 임채만, 유신혜, 신성준, 김도연, Min Sun Kim, 이현정, 서세영, 임지연pp. 20-29Comparison of the Data of a Next-Generation Sequencing Panel from K-MASTER Project with That of Orthogonal Methods for Detecting Targetable Genetic Alterations신상원, 임승택, 장원진, 박경화, 이종원, 강은주, 조성심, 김정선, 임태규, 김혜숙, 김유정, 이수현, 최정윤, 김주원, 조장호, 안미선, 임아름, 김영생, 박지현, 이영우, 정희준, 김열홍, 최윤지, 성재숙pp. 30-39Targeted Liquid Biopsy Using Irradiation to Facilitate the Release of Cell-Free DNA from a Spatially Aimed Tumor Tissue박지현, 안원균, 노재명, 표홍렬, 박웅양, 이호연, 김연정, 최창훈, 이태섭, 박동현pp. 40-53