Endometrial ablation and resection versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of endometrial ablation or resection (E:A/R) compared to hysterectomy for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Literature search was conducted, and randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing (E:A/R) versus hysterectomy were reviewed. The search was last updated in November 2022. Twelve RCTs with 2,028 women (hysterectomy: n=977 vs. [E:A/R]: n=1,051) were included in the analyzis. The meta-analysis revealed that the hysterectomy group showed improved patient-reported and objective bleeding symptoms more than those of the (E:A/R) group, with risk ratios of (mean difference [MD], 0.75; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.71 to 0.79) and (MD, 44.00; 95% CI, 36.09 to 51.91), respectively. Patient satisfaction was higher post-hysterectomy than (E:A/R) at 2 years of follow-up, but this effect was absent with long-term follow-up. (E:A/R) is considered an alternative to hysterectomy as a surgical management for heavy menstrual bleeding. Although both procedures are highly effective, safe, and improve the quality of life, hysterectomy is significantly superior at improving bleeding symptoms and patient satisfaction for up to 2 years. However, it is associated with longer operating and recovery times and a higher rate of postoperative complications. The initial cost of (E:A/R) is less than the cost of hysterectomy, but further surgical requirements are common; therefore, there is no difference in the cost for long-term follow-up.
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of endometrial ablation or resection (E:A/R) compared to hysterectomy for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Literature search was conducted, and randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing (E:A/R) versus hysterectomy were reviewed. The search was last updated in November 2022. Twelve RCTs with 2,028 women (hysterectomy: n=977 vs. [E:A/R]: n=1,051) were included in the analyzis. The meta-analysis revealed that the hysterectomy group showed improved patient-reported and objective bleeding symptoms more than those of the (E:A/R) group, with risk ratios of (mean difference [MD], 0.75; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.71 to 0.79) and (MD, 44.00; 95% CI, 36.09 to 51.91), respectively. Patient satisfaction was higher post-hysterectomy than (E:A/R) at 2 years of follow-up, but this effect was absent with long-term follow-up. (E:A/R) is considered an alternative to hysterectomy as a surgical management for heavy menstrual bleeding. Although both procedures are highly effective, safe, and improve the quality of life, hysterectomy is significantly superior at improving bleeding symptoms and patient satisfaction for up to 2 years. However, it is associated with longer operating and recovery times and a higher rate of postoperative complications. The initial cost of (E:A/R) is less than the cost of hysterectomy, but further surgical requirements are common; therefore, there is no difference in the cost for long-term follow-up.
참고문헌 (48)
- "Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management" (2018)[URL]
- Selvanathan S, "Quality of life after hysterectomy and uterus-sparing hysteroscopic management of abnormal uterine bleeding or heavy menstrual bleeding", J Midlife Health, 10, pp.63~69 (2019)
- "Complications: hysterectomy" (2020)[URL]
- Fergusson RJ, "Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8, pp.CD000329~ (2019)
- Roberts TE, "Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system(mirena)for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding : cost effectiveness analysis", BMJ, 342, pp.d2202~ (2011)
- Bofill Rodriguez M, "Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, pp.CD000329~ (2021)
- Higgins JP, "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions" (2019), John Wiley &Sons
- "Quasi-randomised trial" (2022)[URL]
- Liberati A, "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions : explanation and elaboration", PLoS Med, 6, pp.e1000100~ (2009)
- "RevMan version 5.3" (2014)[URL]
- "Mantel-haenszel method" (2020)[URL]
- Higgins JP, "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses", BMJ, 327, pp.557~560 (2003)
- Nikolakopoulou A, "How to interpret meta-analysis models : fixed effect and random effects meta-analyses", Evid Based Ment Health, 17, pp.64~ (2014)
- "GRADEpro GDT" (2015)[URL]
- Cooper K, "Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial", Lancet, 394, pp.1425~1436 (2019)
- Dickersin K, "Hysterectomy compared with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding : a randomized controlled trial", Obstet Gynecol, 110, pp.1279~1289 (2007)
- Jain P, "Randomized controlled trial of thermal balloon ablation versus vaginal hysterectomy for leiomyoma-induced heavy menstrual bleeding", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 135, pp.140~144 (2016)
- Lin H, "Comparison between microwave endometrial ablation and total hysterectomy", Chin Med J(Engl), 119, pp.1195~1197 (2006)
- Sesti F, "Thermal balloon ablation versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding : a randomized study", J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 37, pp.1650~1657 (2011)
- Crosignani PG, "Endometrial resection versus vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia : long-term clinical and quality-of-life outcomes", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 177, pp.95~101 (1997)
- Gannon MJ, "A randomised trial comparing endometrial resection and abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia", BMJ, 303, pp.1362~1364 (1991)
- O’Connor H, "Medical research council randomised trial of endometrial resection versus hysterectomy in management of menorrhagia", Lancet, 349, pp.897~901 (1997)
- Dwyer N, "Randomised controlled trial comparing endometrial resection with abdominal hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of menorrhagia", Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 100, pp.237~243 (1993)
- Zupi E, "Hysteroscopic endometrial resection versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding : long-term follow-up of a randomized trial", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 22, pp.841~845 (2015)
- Elmantwe A, "Bipolar endometrial resection(BER)versus non descent vaginal hysterectomy(NDVH)for leiomyoma induced heavy menstrual bleeding", EFSS, 21, pp.9~16 (2017)
- Pinion SB, "Randomised trial of hysterectomy, endometrial laser ablation, and transcervical endometrial resection for dysfunctional uterine bleeding", BMJ, 309, pp.979~983 (1994)
- Cooper K, "Outcomes following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding : retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland", BJOG, 118, pp.1171~1179 (2011)
- Middleton LJ, "Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system(Mirena)for heavy menstrual bleeding : systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients", BMJ, 341, pp.c3292~ (2010)
- Waljee J, "Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery : a systematic review", Surgery, 155, pp.799~808 (2014)
- Minalt N, "Endometrial ablation" (2022), StatPearls Publishing
- Brandsborg B, "Risk factors for chronic pain after hysterectomy : a nationwide questionnaire and database study", Anesthesiology, 106, pp.1003~1012 (2007)
- "Obstet Gynecol Sci", 2016, 141~
- Thomassee MS, "Predicting pelvic pain after endometrial ablation : which preoperative patient characteristics are associated?", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 20, pp.642~647 (2013)
- Clarke-Pearson DL, "Complications of hysterectomy", Obstet Gynecol, 121, pp.654~673 (2013)
- Matteson KA, "A systematic review comparing hysterectomy with less-invasive treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 19, pp.13~28 (2011)
- Overton C, "A national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for menstrual disorders : the MISTLETOE study. Minimally invasive surgical techniques--laser, endothermal or endorescetion", Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 104, pp.1351~1359 (1997)
- Danesh M, "The effect of hysterectomy on women’s sexual function : a narrative review", Med Arch, 69, pp.387~392 (2015)
- Garry R, "The eVALuate study : two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy", BMJ, 328, pp.129~ (2004)
- Bofill Rodriguez M, "Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1, pp.CD001501~ (2019)
- Cancelliere C, "Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness : best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews", Chiropr Man Therap, 24, pp.32~ (2016)
- Miller JD, "Cost-effectiveness of global endometrial ablation vs. hysterectomy for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding : US commercial and medicaid payer perspectives", Popul Health Manag, 18, pp.373~382 (2015)
- Sculpher MJ, "Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection : effect on health related quality of life and costs two years after surgery", Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 103, pp.142~149 (1996)
- "A randomised trial of endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: outcome at four years. Aberdeen endometrial ablation trials group", Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 106, pp.360~366 (1999)
- Cameron IM, "A cost comparison of hysterectomy and hysteroscopic surgery for the treatment of menorrhagia", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 70, pp.87~92 (1996)
- Alexander DA, "Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding : psychiatric and psychosocial aspects", BMJ, 312, pp.280~284 (1996)
- Hall JC, "Methodologic standards in surgical trials", Surgery, 119, pp.466~472 (1996)
- Nikolova D, "The cochrane hepato-biliary group as a resource example of evidencebased medicine for all", Acta Med Port, 26, pp.81~82 (2013)
- Gurusamy K, "Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery", Br J Surg, 95, pp.1088~1097 (2008)
