Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port access (SPA) and conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomies (TLH) among patients with very large uteri (500 g or more). Methods Fifty consecutive patients who received TLH for large uterine myomas and/or adenomyoses weighing 500 g or more between February 2009 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. SPA and conventional TLH were each performed in 25 patients. Surgical outcomes, including operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin change, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain, and perioperative complications, were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. All operations were completed laparoscopically with no conversion to laparotomy. Total operation time, uterus weight, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hemoglobin change did not significantly differ between the two groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for the SPA-TLH group compared to that of the conventional TLH group (median [range], 3 [2.0–6.0] vs. 4 [3–7] days; P=0.004]. There were no inter-group differences in postoperative pain at 6, 24, and 72 hours after surgery. There was only one complicated case in each group. Conclusion SPA-TLH in patients with large uteri weighing 500 g or more is as feasible as conventional TLH. SPA-TLH is associated with shorter hospital stays compared to that of conventional TLH.
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port access (SPA) and conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomies (TLH) among patients with very large uteri (500 g or more). Methods Fifty consecutive patients who received TLH for large uterine myomas and/or adenomyoses weighing 500 g or more between February 2009 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. SPA and conventional TLH were each performed in 25 patients. Surgical outcomes, including operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin change, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain, and perioperative complications, were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. All operations were completed laparoscopically with no conversion to laparotomy. Total operation time, uterus weight, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hemoglobin change did not significantly differ between the two groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for the SPA-TLH group compared to that of the conventional TLH group (median [range], 3 [2.0–6.0] vs. 4 [3–7] days; P=0.004]. There were no inter-group differences in postoperative pain at 6, 24, and 72 hours after surgery. There was only one complicated case in each group. Conclusion SPA-TLH in patients with large uteri weighing 500 g or more is as feasible as conventional TLH. SPA-TLH is associated with shorter hospital stays compared to that of conventional TLH.
참고문헌 (20)
- Kongwattanakul K., "Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy : a randomized controlled trial", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 19, pp.89~94 (2012)
- Bijen CB., "Cost effectiveness of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early stage endometrial cancer : a randomized trial", Gynecol Oncol, 121, pp.76~82 (2011)
- Canes D., "Transumbilical single-port surgery : evolution and current status", Eur Urol, 54, pp.1020~1029 (2008)
- Kaouk JH., "Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology : initial experience", Urology, 71, pp.3~6 (2008)
- Choi YS., "Singleport vs. conventional multi-port access laparoscopyassisted vaginal hysterectomy : comparison of surgical outcomes and complications", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 169, pp.366~369 (2013)
- Wheeless CR Jr., "A rapid inexpensive, and effective method of surgical sterilization by laparoscopy", J Reprod Med, 3, pp.65~69 (1969)
- Thompson B., "Outpatient sterilization by laparoscopy : a report of 666 patients", Obstet Gynecol, 38, pp.912~915 (1971)
- Pelosi MA., "Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture", N J Med, 88, pp.721~726 (1991)
- Song T., "Single port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uterus weighing exceeding 500 grams : technique and initial report", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 17, pp.456~460 (2010)
- 박성남, "SILS 포트를 이용한 단일공법 복강경하 질식자궁절제술과 삼공법 복강경하 질식자궁절제술의 비교", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 55(01), pp.22~28 (2012), 대한산부인과학회
- 이건우, "500 g 이상의 거대자궁에 대한 단일공 복강경하 자궁절제술", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 55(06), pp.392~397 (2012), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
- Song T., "Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 75, pp.16~20 (2013)
- Yim GW., "Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 203, pp.26.e1~26.e6 (2010)
- Ribeiro SC., "A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 83, pp.37~43 (2003)
- Tai HC., "Homemade transumbilical port : an alternative access for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery(LESS)", Surg Endosc, 24, pp.705~708 (2010)
- Jung YW., "A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain", Surg Endosc, 25, pp.2462~2469 (2011)
- Lee JH., "A prospective comparison of single-port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy using transumbilical GelPort access and multiport laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 158, pp.294~297 (2011)
- Choi YS., "Single-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy : our initial experiences with 100 cases", Minim Invasive Surg, 2012, pp.543627~ (2012)
- Chen YJ., "Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy : a randomized controlled trial", Obstet Gynecol, 117, pp.906~912 (2011)
- 윤애라, "Single-port access laparoscopic staging operation for a borderline ovarian tumor", Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 22(2), pp.127~130 (2011), 대한부인종양학회