본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

NORM 폐기물 매립 시 NDD 분석을 활용한 부지 내 주요 피폭인자 도출

Derivation of On-site Major Exposure Factor using NDD Analysis when Landfilling NORM Waste

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

As part of the social response to the radon bed incident in 2018, the Nuclear Safety and Security Com mission took measures to collect and dispose of all radon beds. The Waste Management Act provides landfill dispos al as one of the disposal methods for natural radioactive product waste, which is one of the NORM wastes. WhenNORM wastes are landfilled, workers and the public at the landfill site are exposed to radiation through variouspathways, such as leaching of radionuclides through soil and groundwater, and multiple exposure factors are involvedsimultaneously. In order to improve the reliability of radiological impact assessment, the values of main exposurefactors should be selected more accurately. Therefore, before developing the main exposure factors for site character istics, it is necessary to prioritize main exposure factors reflecting domestic characteristics of NORM waste landfills. Therefore, in this study, the main exposure factors for NORM waste landfill were derived using NDD analysis. Toderive the main exposure factors, the analysis tool was first selected as RESRAD-ONSITE computer code, and theexposure scenarios were mainly selected as a resident farmer and suburban resident scenario, recreation scenario, andindustrial worker scenario. Then, the priority 1 and 2 factors were selected for sensitivity analysis, and a Korean stan dard model was established to reflect Korean characteristics. Finally, the sensitivity analysis was conducted throughNDD, and the main exposure factors were derived based on this. In the resident farmer scenario, the contaminatedzone distribution coefficients of 226Ra, 210Pb, 232Th, 228Ra, 234U, and 238U, as well as precipitation and evapotranspirationfactors, were derived as the main exposure factors. In the suburban resident scenario, the contaminated zone distribu tion coefficients of 226Ra, 210Pb, 232Th, 228Ra, 234U, and 238U, as well as precipitation and evapotranspiration coefficients,were derived as the main exposure factors. In the recreation scenario, the contaminated zone distribution coefficientof 232Th was derived as the main exposure factor. For the industrial worker scenario, the erosion rate was derived asthe main exposure factor. The main exposure factors for each scenario were analyzed to be different depending onthe scenario characteristics. The results of this study can be utilized as a basis for radiological environmental impactassessment of NORM waste landfill in Korea.

Abstract

As part of the social response to the radon bed incident in 2018, the Nuclear Safety and Security Com mission took measures to collect and dispose of all radon beds. The Waste Management Act provides landfill dispos al as one of the disposal methods for natural radioactive product waste, which is one of the NORM wastes. WhenNORM wastes are landfilled, workers and the public at the landfill site are exposed to radiation through variouspathways, such as leaching of radionuclides through soil and groundwater, and multiple exposure factors are involvedsimultaneously. In order to improve the reliability of radiological impact assessment, the values of main exposurefactors should be selected more accurately. Therefore, before developing the main exposure factors for site character istics, it is necessary to prioritize main exposure factors reflecting domestic characteristics of NORM waste landfills. Therefore, in this study, the main exposure factors for NORM waste landfill were derived using NDD analysis. Toderive the main exposure factors, the analysis tool was first selected as RESRAD-ONSITE computer code, and theexposure scenarios were mainly selected as a resident farmer and suburban resident scenario, recreation scenario, andindustrial worker scenario. Then, the priority 1 and 2 factors were selected for sensitivity analysis, and a Korean stan dard model was established to reflect Korean characteristics. Finally, the sensitivity analysis was conducted throughNDD, and the main exposure factors were derived based on this. In the resident farmer scenario, the contaminatedzone distribution coefficients of 226Ra, 210Pb, 232Th, 228Ra, 234U, and 238U, as well as precipitation and evapotranspirationfactors, were derived as the main exposure factors. In the suburban resident scenario, the contaminated zone distribu tion coefficients of 226Ra, 210Pb, 232Th, 228Ra, 234U, and 238U, as well as precipitation and evapotranspiration coefficients,were derived as the main exposure factors. In the recreation scenario, the contaminated zone distribution coefficientof 232Th was derived as the main exposure factor. For the industrial worker scenario, the erosion rate was derived asthe main exposure factor. The main exposure factors for each scenario were analyzed to be different depending onthe scenario characteristics. The results of this study can be utilized as a basis for radiological environmental impactassessment of NORM waste landfill in Korea.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. "Waste Control Act Article 20172", ~
  2. "Radiation in the Natural Environment Safety and Control Act Article 20141", ~
  3. NRC, "Systematic Radiological Assessment of Exemptions for Source and Byproduct Materials, NUREG-1717", ~ (2001)
  4. Mohamad Kontol K, "Radiological Impact Assessment in Disposal of Treated Sludge", Junal Sains Nuklear Malaysia, 27(2), pp.23~30 (2015)
  5. Anggraini Z, "Radiological Impact Assessment of Class 3 Landfill of TENORM Waste from Tin Industry in Bangka Island", Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 19(5), pp.337~347 (2021)[DOI]
  6. Kamboj S, "Deterministic vs. probabilistic analyses to identify sensitive parameters in dose assessment using RESRAD", Health Phys, 88(5), pp.104~109 (2005)[DOI]
  7. A Prospective Radiological Risk Assessment for a Phosphate Industry Project, "Reis R. G.", ~, pp.INIS-BR-17357 (2012)
  8. Lopes AG, "Radiological assessment of the disposal of bulk oil NORM waste: Case study from Brazil", Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 261, pp.10713~ (2023)[DOI]
  9. Shadrina N, "Effect of Cover Layer on Radiological Impact of Landfill for TENORM Waste from Tin Industry in Bangka Island", AIP Conf. Proc, 2501(1), pp.020003~ (2022)
  10. Ryu GW, "Site Specific Parameters Sensitivity Analysis for Site Reuse after Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities", Journal of Radiation Industry, 15(2), pp.107~116 (2021)[DOI]
  11. ANL, "User’s Manual for RESRAD Version 6. ANL", EAD-4, 2001
  12. NRC, "Decision Methods for Dose Assessment to Comply with Radiological Criteria for License Termination, NUREG-1549", ~ (1998)
  13. Development of Probabilistic RESRAD 6.0 and RESRAD-BUILD 3.0 Computer Codes, "NRC", ~, pp.NUREG (2000), CR-6697
  14. Korea Waste Association, "Current state of waste management", ~ (2021)
  15. Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impact of Radioactive Material in Soil and Building Structures, "ANL", ~, pp.ANL (2015), EVS[DOI]
  16. Korea Health Industry Development Institute, "Intake by food group", ~ (2021)
  17. Update for Chapter 5 of the Exposure Factors Handbook, "EPA", ~, pp.EPA (2017), 600[DOI]
  18. Research on ways to improve the INDAC system, "KINS", ~, pp.KINS (2011), RR-808
  19. ICRP, "Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66. Ann. ICRP 24 (1-3)", ~ (1994)
  20. Radiological Dose Assessments for Clearance of the Concrete Waste from KRR-1&2, "KAERI", ~, pp.KAERI (2003), TR-2578[DOI]
  21. Statistics Korea, "Life Time Survey", ~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)