본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

재건축초과이익 환수제도의 법적 검토

Legal Review on Restitution of Exceed Gains from Reconstruction

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The restitution of exceed gains from reconstruction was introduced to prevent the privatization of exceed gains or unearned income and ultimately to stabilize housing prices. However, there would be room for unconstitutionality when we consider restriction of property rights, difficulties of a fair and accurate measurement of property liable for taxation, lack of appropriate regulations in case of land price declines, double taxation, retroactive legislation, violation of the principle of equality, violation of the principle of excessive prohibition. This system was created in the era of real estate boom and there was no social consensus during the process of creating the system. This system, compared to another restitution system of development gains, restricts property rights quite excessively. Moreover, there were not enough legislative considerations of subjects who have property rights and freedom of the reconstruction. Considering shrinking real estate market of nowadays and the restitution of exceed gains from the reconstruction of apartments, we can see that the reconstruction of apartments is getting more and more difficult. However in the future the reconstruction of apartments should not have to be suppressed, but rather to be supported, especially considering that apartments in the 1st New City and other neighboring area are presently more than 20 years old and their building coverage and floor area ratio are very high. So we will have to consider introducing policies to encourage the reconstruction of apartments. Through the analysis of the status and problems of restitution development gains including the restitution of exceed gains from the reconstruction of apartments, we will be able to discuss ways to improve the system. First, we must formulate national consensus that land or housing benefit or unearned income generated from any developments or redevelopments should be restituted, complying with the principle of social state and the public concept of land. Second, we need to restitute exceed gains originated from all development projects without exception and modify our legal system necessary for restitution of exceed gains from all development projects not only for the development areas but also for the neighborhood of the development areas.

Abstract

The restitution of exceed gains from reconstruction was introduced to prevent the privatization of exceed gains or unearned income and ultimately to stabilize housing prices. However, there would be room for unconstitutionality when we consider restriction of property rights, difficulties of a fair and accurate measurement of property liable for taxation, lack of appropriate regulations in case of land price declines, double taxation, retroactive legislation, violation of the principle of equality, violation of the principle of excessive prohibition. This system was created in the era of real estate boom and there was no social consensus during the process of creating the system. This system, compared to another restitution system of development gains, restricts property rights quite excessively. Moreover, there were not enough legislative considerations of subjects who have property rights and freedom of the reconstruction. Considering shrinking real estate market of nowadays and the restitution of exceed gains from the reconstruction of apartments, we can see that the reconstruction of apartments is getting more and more difficult. However in the future the reconstruction of apartments should not have to be suppressed, but rather to be supported, especially considering that apartments in the 1st New City and other neighboring area are presently more than 20 years old and their building coverage and floor area ratio are very high. So we will have to consider introducing policies to encourage the reconstruction of apartments. Through the analysis of the status and problems of restitution development gains including the restitution of exceed gains from the reconstruction of apartments, we will be able to discuss ways to improve the system. First, we must formulate national consensus that land or housing benefit or unearned income generated from any developments or redevelopments should be restituted, complying with the principle of social state and the public concept of land. Second, we need to restitute exceed gains originated from all development projects without exception and modify our legal system necessary for restitution of exceed gains from all development projects not only for the development areas but also for the neighborhood of the development areas.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" (2004), 법문사
  2. 류해웅, "토지공법론" (2006), 삼영사
  3. 박균성, "행정법론(상) 제7판" (2008), 박영사
  4. 박원식, "우리나라 도시재개발사업의 문제점과 개선방안" (1990), 한국토지행정학회
  5. 석종현, "손실보상법론" (2003), 삼영사
  6. 정태용, "도시공법개론" (2007), 세창출판사
  7. 길 준 규, "재건축 개발이익환수제도의 법적 문제", 공법학연구, 7(3), pp.47~76 (2006), 한국비교공법학회
  8. 길준규, "재건축개발부담금의 필요성과 위헌성여부", 국회 건설교통 위원회, 재건축초과이익환수에 관한 법률안 제정에 관한 공청회, ~ (2006)
  9. 김성수, "재건축부담금에 대한 헌법적 검토", 토지공법연구, 31, pp.29~58 (2006), 한국토지공법학회
  10. 김수갑, "?재건축초과이익 환수에 관한 법률?의 법적 쟁점과 과제", 공법학연구, 7(2), pp.403~432 (2006), 한국비교공법학회
  11. 김완석, "재건축에 관한 조세법적 검토", 토지공법학회 제49회 학술대회자료집 (2006), 토지공법학회
  12. 김용창, "개발이익 환수제도 운영과정의 법적쟁점과 사법적 판단", 토지공법연구, 48, pp.269~296 (2010), 한국토지공법학회
  13. 김재철, "재건축초과이익 환수에 관한 법률안의 위헌성여부", 국회 건설교통위원회, 재건축초과이익환수에 관한 법률안 제정에 관한 공청회, ~ (2006)
  14. 류해웅, "개발이익환수제도의 발전적 전개를 위한 법적고찰", 토지공법연구, 9 (2002), 한국토지공법학회
  15. 류해웅, "토지보상에 있어서 개발이익 배제에 관한 법제적 고찰", 부동산연구, 17(1), pp.115~136 (2007), 한국부동산연구원
  16. 서순탁, "개발부담금제의 문제점과 개선방안", 경실련도시개혁센터 세미나, ~ (2004)
  17. 서순탁, "아파트 재건축에 따른 개발이익 규모추정 및 이익환수에 관한 연구 - 서울시 사례를 중심으로 -", 토지공법연구, 27, pp.135~149 (2005), 한국토지공법학회
  18. 서순탁, "개발이익환수의 제도화, In:도시문제" (2005), 대한지방행정공제회
  19. 성소미, "재건축 개발이익환수에 관한 법적 쟁점", 토지공법연구, 31, pp.1~28 (2006), 한국토지공법학회
  20. 이동수, "再建築開發利益還收制의 內容과 問題點", 토지공법연구, 25, pp.81~100 (2005), 한국토지공법학회
  21. 임윤수, "개발이익환수제도에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (21), pp.1~20 (2006), 한국법학회
  22. 정완수, "도시재개발제도의 개선방향", 국토: planning and policy, 176 (1996), 국토연구원
  23. 정지선, "재개발 재건축 관련 조세법상 쟁점과 정책과제", 조세연구, 10(2), pp.71~115 (2010), 한국조세연구포럼
  24. 정창무, "개발이익 환수의 문제점과 제도개선방안", 부동산학연구, 3 (1997), 한국부동산분석학회
  25. 도시개발과 토지정책, 도시문제, "도시개발과 개발이익환수, In: 특집", pp.1989, 최병선
  26. 하성규, "도시재개발에 있어서 갈등요인의 분석과 해소방안", 한국지방자치학회보, 10(2)통권 : 23 (1998), 한국지방자치학회
  27. 황명찬, "개발이익환수에 관한 연구", 연구논총, 7 (1979), 건대행정대학원
  28. 황해봉, "도시재개발과 개발이익환수제도", 법학논고, (31), pp.653~684 (2009), 법학연구원
  29. "재건축초과이익 환수에 관한 법률 일부개정법률안 검토보고"[URL]
  30. "재건축초과이익 환수에 관한 법률 폐지법률안 검토보고"[URL]
  31. "재건축부담금제 폐지되나? 6월 임시국회서 폐지안 상정"[URL]
  32. "투기적 가수요 촉발시키는 재건축부담금제 폐지 논의를 중단하라"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)