본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effect of an Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot on Hemispatial Neglect in Stroke Patients

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of an upper limb rehabilitation robot therapy on hemispatial neglect in stroke patients.Methods Patients were randomly divided into an upper limb rehabilitation robot treatment group (robot group) and a control group. The patients in the robot group received left upper limb training using an upper limb rehabilitation robot. The patients sat on the right side of the robot, so that the monitor of the robot was located on the patients’ left side. In this position, patients could focus continuously on the left side. The control group received conventional neglect treatment, such as visual scanning training and range of motion exercises, administered by occupational therapists. Both groups received their respective therapies for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Several tests were used to evaluate treatment effects before and after the 3-week treatment. Results In total, 38 patients (20 in the robot group and 18 in the control group) completed the study. After completion of the treatment sessions, both groups showed significant improvements in the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test 3rd edition (MVPT-3), the line bisection test, the star cancellation test, the Albert’s test, the Catherine Bergego scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index. The changes in all measurements showed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion This present study showed that the upper limb robot treatment had benefits for hemispatial neglect in stroke patients that were similar to conventional neglect treatment. The upper limb robot treatment could be a therapeutic option in the treatment of hemispatial neglect after stroke.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of an upper limb rehabilitation robot therapy on hemispatial neglect in stroke patients.Methods Patients were randomly divided into an upper limb rehabilitation robot treatment group (robot group) and a control group. The patients in the robot group received left upper limb training using an upper limb rehabilitation robot. The patients sat on the right side of the robot, so that the monitor of the robot was located on the patients’ left side. In this position, patients could focus continuously on the left side. The control group received conventional neglect treatment, such as visual scanning training and range of motion exercises, administered by occupational therapists. Both groups received their respective therapies for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Several tests were used to evaluate treatment effects before and after the 3-week treatment. Results In total, 38 patients (20 in the robot group and 18 in the control group) completed the study. After completion of the treatment sessions, both groups showed significant improvements in the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test 3rd edition (MVPT-3), the line bisection test, the star cancellation test, the Albert’s test, the Catherine Bergego scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index. The changes in all measurements showed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion This present study showed that the upper limb robot treatment had benefits for hemispatial neglect in stroke patients that were similar to conventional neglect treatment. The upper limb robot treatment could be a therapeutic option in the treatment of hemispatial neglect after stroke.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Luaute J, "Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness", Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 30, pp.961~982 (2006)
  2. Ting DS, "Visual neglect following stroke:current concepts and future focus", Surv Ophthalmol, 56, pp.114~134 (2011)
  3. Pierce SR, "Treatments of unilateral neglect:a review", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, pp.256~268 (2002)
  4. Heilman KM, "Frontal lobe neglect in man", Neurology, 22, pp.660~664 (1972)
  5. Watson RT, "Thalamic neglect", Neurology, 29, pp.690~694 (1979)
  6. Damasio AR, "Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal ganglia", Neuropsychologia, 18, pp.123~132 (1980)
  7. Halligan PW, "Toward a principled explanation of unilateral neglect", Cogn Neuropsychol, 11, pp.167~206 (1994)
  8. Posner MI, "The attention system of the human brain", Annu Rev Neurosci, 13, pp.25~42 (1990)
  9. Bailey MJ, "Treatment of visual neglect in elderly patients with stroke: a single-subject series using either a scanning and cueing strategy or a left-limb activation strategy", Phys Ther, 82, pp.782~797 (2002)
  10. Paolucci S, "Facilitatory effect of neglect rehabilitation on the recovery of left hemiplegic stroke patients: a cross-over study", J Neurol, 243, pp.308~314 (1996)
  11. Paolucci S, "Changes in functional outcome in inpatient stroke rehabilitation resulting from new health policy regulations in Italy", Eur J Neurol, 5, pp.17~22 (1998)
  12. Rode G, "Predominance of postural imbalance in left hemiparetic patients", Scand J Rehabil Med, 29, pp.11~16 (1997)
  13. Kerkhoff G., "Spatial hemineglect in humans", Prog Neurobiol, 63, pp.1~27 (2001)
  14. Weinberg J, "Visual scanning training effect on reading-related tasks in acquired right brain damage", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 58, pp.479~486 (1977)
  15. Antonucci G, "Effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation in a randomized group study", J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 17, pp.383~389 (1995)
  16. Robertson IH, "Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral left neglect: the role of hemispace, hand and motor activation", Neuropsychologia, 30, pp.553~563 (1992)
  17. Rossetti Y, "Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect", Nature, 395, pp.166~169 (1998)
  18. Frassinetti F, "Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation", Brain, 125(Pt 3), pp.608~623 (2002)
  19. Priftis K, "Visual scanning training, limb activation treatment, and prism adaptation for rehabilitating left neglect: who is the winner?", Front Hum Neurosci, 7, pp.360~ (2013)
  20. Lo AC, "Clinical designs of recent robot rehabilitation trials", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 91(11 Suppl 3), pp.S204~S216 (2012)
  21. Mazzoleni S, "Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in chronic and subacute stroke patients: a kinematic analysis", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 92(10Suppl 2), pp.e26~e37 (2013)
  22. 김정수, "뇌졸중 환자에서 로봇 보조 상지 재활의 임상적 결과·", 뇌신경재활, 8(1), pp.46~52 (2015), 대한뇌신경재활학회
  23. Kerkhoff G, "Smooth pursuit “bedside”training reduces disability and unawareness during the activities of daily living in neglect : a randomized controlled trial", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 28, pp.554~563 (2014)
  24. Mercier L, "Normative data for the motor-free visual perception test-vertical", Phys Occup Ther Geriatr, 19, pp.39~50 (2001)
  25. Schenkenberg T, "Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment", Neurology, 30, pp.509~517 (1980)
  26. Albert ML, "A simple test of visual neglect", Neurology, 23, pp.658~664 (1973)
  27. Chen P, "Functional assessment of spatial neglect: a review of the Catherine Bergego scale and an introduction of the Kessler foundation neglect assessment process", Top Stroke Rehabil, 19, pp.423~435 (2012)
  28. Rizzolatti G, "Neglect as a neural representation deficit", Rev Neurol (Paris), 146, pp.626~634 (1990)
  29. Robertson IH, "Spatiomotor cueing in unilateral left neglect: three case studies of its therapeutic effects", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 55, pp.799~805 (1992)
  30. Gainotti G, "Left hand movements and right hemisphere activation in unilateral spatial neglect: a test of the interhemispheric imbalance hypothesis", Neuropsychologia, 40, pp.1350~1355 (2002)
  31. Brunila T, "Experiences of combined visual training and arm activation in the rehabilitation of unilateral visual neglect: a clinical study", Neuropsychol Rehabil, 12, pp.27~40 (2002)
  32. Masiero S, "Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke:a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy", J Rehabil Med, 41, pp.981~985 (2009)
  33. Lo AC, "Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1772~1783 (2010)
  34. Varalta V, "Effects of contralesional robot-assisted hand training in patients with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: a case series study", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 11, pp.160~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)