정지용 시가 윤동주에게 미친 영향

Abstract

The Poetic Works of Jeong Ji-yong published on October 27, 1935 has probably been read by many literature aspirants. Yun Dong-ju purchased this collection on March 1, 1936 and as he read the poems, he wrote his own sentiments in the blank spaces of the book. It was his way of intensively reading and appreciating each line of Jeong Ji-yong’s poems. The poetry of Jeong Ji-yong influenced poets other than Yun Dong-ju as well but his influence on Yun Dong-ju appears to be more distinct. The influence of the poetry of Jeong Ji-yong can be seen a lot in his early works written before 1938 and because these works were written as memos in his notes rather than for the purpose of being made public, there are many passages which unconsciously use lines read from the poetry of Jeong Ji-yong. The poetry of Jeong Ji-yong was developed in a direction that mainly concentrates on linguistic expression and Yun Dong-ju concentrated on expressing his own concerns and meditations so the thoughts and topics of the two poets show incredibly different aspects. Because of this, the traces of influence are mostly limited to poetic diction and dimensions of expression. This is a complex reconstitution of the reading experience of Yun Dong-ju as he was absorbed in the poetry of Jeong Ji-yong. Pieces written in the creative stages after September of 1939 have a good command of mature representations based on Yun Dong-ju’s own grounds. By this period, Yun Dong-ju had broken away from the influences of others and had established himself as an independent poet. This thesis reviewed the traces of influences in 13 pieces and this is a considerably high number. This is also proof of the strong literary influence that the poetry of Jeong Ji-yong possesses. However, the poetry of Yun Dong-ju should not be devalued because of this fact. The reason is because all 13 poems reviewed here were early pieces written in his notes. Compared to the first Yun Dong-ju poem collection, the current and final manuscript has an addition of 88 poems and most of these are early works which were written in Yun Dong-ju’s notes. The fact that these pieces are equally placed alongside Yun Dong-ju’s other works in his poetry collection is an issue worth of reconsideration. At this, it seems proper that in the case of Yun Dong-ju, collections should be separately presented, with one for research and one to be supplied to readers.