본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of conceptual differences on the semantic memory retrieval

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The present study aims to investigate whether there are any effects of conceptual distinctions on semantic memory retrieval, and if so, how different concepts play out in cued-recall. Semantic memory is one of the core features characterizing humans, and includes all acquired knowledge about the world. We conducted a semantic memory cued-recall study comparing action-associated and literal sentences with non-action and metaphoric ones. Here, we report that action-related sentences are better recalled than their non-action counterparts. This result is attributable to more sensory-motor activation of action-related utterancesleading to a better maintenance in memory, which is in support of the Grounded Cognition (henceforth, GC) theory. In addition, we observed a literal sentence advantage during the same task, given that literal sentences are remembered to a greater extent than metaphoric sentences. This finding is also accounted for by the GC model in a way that the more concrete a concept is, the more activation in the sensory-motor cortex it will engage during comprehension, thereby inducing a more effective recall.

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate whether there are any effects of conceptual distinctions on semantic memory retrieval, and if so, how different concepts play out in cued-recall. Semantic memory is one of the core features characterizing humans, and includes all acquired knowledge about the world. We conducted a semantic memory cued-recall study comparing action-associated and literal sentences with non-action and metaphoric ones. Here, we report that action-related sentences are better recalled than their non-action counterparts. This result is attributable to more sensory-motor activation of action-related utterancesleading to a better maintenance in memory, which is in support of the Grounded Cognition (henceforth, GC) theory. In addition, we observed a literal sentence advantage during the same task, given that literal sentences are remembered to a greater extent than metaphoric sentences. This finding is also accounted for by the GC model in a way that the more concrete a concept is, the more activation in the sensory-motor cortex it will engage during comprehension, thereby inducing a more effective recall.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Allport, Alan., "Current perspectives in dysphasia", pp.32~60 (1985), Churchill Livingstone
  2. Barsalou, Lawrence, "Grounded cognition", Annual Review of Psychology, 59, pp.617~645 (2008)
  3. Barsalou, Lawrence, "The psychology of learning and motivation", pp.43~92 (2003), Academic
  4. Binder, Jeffrey, "The neurobiology of semantic memory", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), pp.527~536 (2011)
  5. Boulenger, Véronique, "Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200msec of processing", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), pp.1607~1615 (2006)
  6. Buccino, Giovanni, "Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study", Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), pp.355~363 (2005)
  7. Corthout, Erik, "Suppression of vision by transcranial magnetic stimulation : a third mechanism", NeuroReport, 11(11), pp.2345~2349 (2000)
  8. Desai, Rutvik, "A piece of the action : Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors", NeuroImage, 83, pp.862~869 (2013)
  9. Farah, Martha, "A computational model of semantic memory impairment : Modality specific and emergent category specificity", Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 120(4), pp.339~357 (1991)
  10. Fodor, James., "The language of thought, vol 5" (1975), Harvard University Press
  11. Fodor, James., "The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology" (1983), MIT Press
  12. Gallese, Vittorio, "The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge", Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), pp.455~479 (2005)
  13. Gibbs Jr., Raymond, "The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  14. Gibbs Jr., Raymond, "Embodiment and cognitive science" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  15. Glenberg, Arthur, "Grounding language in action", Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3), pp.558~565 (2002)
  16. Glenberg, Arthur, "The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 43" (2003), Academic Press
  17. Huang, Ying-Zu, "Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex", Neuron, 45, pp.201~206 (2005)
  18. Kiefer, Markus, "Conceptual representations in mind and brain : Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions", Cortex, 48(7), pp.805~825 (2011)
  19. 권익수, "Multimodality and cognitive mechanisms: A cognitive-semantics analysis of political cartoons <stay out of my hair>", 언어연구, 35(1), pp.117~143 (2018), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  20. Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
  21. Lakoff, George, "Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought" (1999), Basic Books
  22. Lambon Ralph, Matthew, "Neural basis of category-specific semantic deficits for living things : Evidence from semantic dementia, HSVE and a neural network model", Brain, 130(4), pp.1127~1137 (2007)
  23. Patterson, Karalyn, "Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain", Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(12), pp.976~987 (2007)
  24. Pulvermüller, Friedemann, "Words in the brain’s language", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), pp.253~279 (1999)
  25. Pulvermüller, Friedemann, "Walking or talking? Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing", Brain and Language, 78(2), pp.143~168 (2001)
  26. Pulvermüller, Friedemann, "Functional links between motor and language systems", European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(3), pp.793~797 (2005)
  27. Pylyshyn, Zenon., "Computation and cognition" (1984), MIT Press
  28. Sato, Marc, "Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing", Brain and Language, 105(2), pp.83~89 (2008)
  29. Simoens, Hannelore, "Salience in second language acquisition" (2018), Routledge
  30. Smith, Edward., "Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, vol 6", pp.1~56 (1978), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc
  31. Toro, Juan, "The contribution of language-specific knowledge in the selection of statistically-coherent word candidates", Journal of Memory and Language, 64(2), pp.171~180 (2011)
  32. Tulving, Endel., "Elements of episodic memory" (1983), Oxford University Press
  33. Warrington, Elizabeth, "Category specific semantic impairments", Brain, 107, pp.829~854 (1984)
  34. Yantis, Steven, "How visual salience wins battle for awareness", Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), pp.975~977 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)