The effect of semantic categorization of episodic memory on encoding of subordinate details: An fMRI study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Grouping episodes into semantically related categories is necessary for better mnemonic structure. However, the effect of grouping on memory of subordinate details was not clearly understood. In an fMRI study, we tested whether attending superordinate during semantic association disrupts or enhances subordinate episodic details. In each cycle of the experiment, five cue words were presented sequentially with two related detail words placed underneath for each cue. Participants were asked whether they could imagine a category that includes the previously shown cue words in each cycle, and their confidence on retrieval was rated. Participants were asked to perform cued recall tests on presented detail words after the session. Behavioral data showed that reaction times for categorization tasks decreased and confidence levels increased in the third trial of each cycle, thus this trial was considered to be an important insight where a semantic category was believed to be successfully established. Critically, the accuracy of recalling detail words presented immediately prior to third trials was lower than those of followed trials, indicating that subordinate details were disrupted during categorization. General linear model analysis of the trial immediately prior to the completion of categorization, specifically the second trial, revealed significant activation in the temporal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus, areas of semantic memory networks. Representative Similarity Analysis revealed that the activation patterns of the third trials were more consistent than those of the second trials in the temporal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and hippocampus. Our research demonstrates that semantic grouping can cause memories of subordinate details to fade, suggesting that semantic retrieval during categorization affects the quality of related episodic memory.
Abstract
Grouping episodes into semantically related categories is necessary for better mnemonic structure. However, the effect of grouping on memory of subordinate details was not clearly understood. In an fMRI study, we tested whether attending superordinate during semantic association disrupts or enhances subordinate episodic details. In each cycle of the experiment, five cue words were presented sequentially with two related detail words placed underneath for each cue. Participants were asked whether they could imagine a category that includes the previously shown cue words in each cycle, and their confidence on retrieval was rated. Participants were asked to perform cued recall tests on presented detail words after the session. Behavioral data showed that reaction times for categorization tasks decreased and confidence levels increased in the third trial of each cycle, thus this trial was considered to be an important insight where a semantic category was believed to be successfully established. Critically, the accuracy of recalling detail words presented immediately prior to third trials was lower than those of followed trials, indicating that subordinate details were disrupted during categorization. General linear model analysis of the trial immediately prior to the completion of categorization, specifically the second trial, revealed significant activation in the temporal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus, areas of semantic memory networks. Representative Similarity Analysis revealed that the activation patterns of the third trials were more consistent than those of the second trials in the temporal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and hippocampus. Our research demonstrates that semantic grouping can cause memories of subordinate details to fade, suggesting that semantic retrieval during categorization affects the quality of related episodic memory.
참고문헌 (42)
- Anderson, J. R., "The adaptive nature of human categorization", Psychological Review, 98(3), pp.409~426 (1991)
- Ashby, F. G., "Categorization as probability density estimation", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39(2), pp.216~233 (1995)
- Badre, D., "Semantic Retrieval, Mnemonic Control, and Prefrontal Cortex", Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1(3), pp.206~218 (2002)
- Bruner, J., "A Study of Thinking" (1956), John Wiley & Sons
- Chase, W. G., "Perception in chess", Cognitive Psychology, 4, pp.55~81 (1973)
- Craik, F. I. M., "Levels of processing : a framework for memory research", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, pp.671~684 (1972)
- Collins, A. M., "A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing", Psychological Review, 82(6), pp.407~428 (1975)
- Michelle E. Costanzo, "Spatial and temporal features of superordinate semantic processing studied with fMRI and EEG", Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7 (2013), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
- Craik, F., "The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, pp.159~180 (1996)
- Craik, F. I. M., "Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 104, pp.268~294 (1975)
- Daselaar, S. M., "Medial temporal lobe activity during semantic classification using a flexible fMRI design", Behavioural brain research, 136(2), pp.399~404 (2002)
- Desmond, J., "Estimating sample size in functional MRI(fMRI)neuroimaging studies : Statistical power analyses", Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 118(2), pp.115~128 (2002)
- Fernandes, M., "Divided attention and memory : evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 129(2), pp.155~176 (2000)
- Friston, K., "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers", NeuroImage, 61(4), pp.1300~1310 (2012)
- Gobet, F., "Chunking mechanisms in human learning", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), pp.236~243 (2001)
- Murray Grossman, "The Neural Basis for Categorization in Semantic Memory", NeuroImage, 17(3), pp.1549~1561 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Hugdahl, K., "Left frontal activation during a semantic categorization task : An fMRI-study", International Journal of Neuroscience, 99, pp.49~58 (1999)
- Huth, A., "Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex", Nature, 532(7600), pp.453~458 (2016)
- J.M. Jansma, "fMRI study of effort and information processing in a working memory task", Human Brain Mapping, 28(5), pp.431~440 (2007), Wiley[DOI]
- Lambon-Ralph, M., "Neural Basis of Category-specific Semantic Deficits for Living Things: Evidence from semantic dementia, HSVE and a Neural Network Model", Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 130(Pt 4), pp.1127~1137 (2007)
- Love, B. C., "SUSTAIN : A network model of category learning", Psychological Review, 111(2), pp.3009~3332 (2004)
- Löw, A., "Semantic categorization in the human brain : spatiotemporal dynamics revealed by magnetoencephalography", Psychological Science, 14(4), pp.367~372 (2003)
- Mandy J Maguire, "How semantic categorization influences inhibitory processing in middle-childhood: An Event Related Potentials study", Brain and Cognition, 76(1), pp.77~86 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Phyllis Koenig, "The neural basis for novel semantic categorization", NeuroImage, 24(2), pp.369~383 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Kriegeskorte, N., "Information-based functional brain mapping", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, pp.3863~3868 (2006)
- Kriegeskorte, N., "Representational similarity analysis-connecting the branches of systems neuroscience", Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2, pp.4~32 (2008)
- Kruschke, J. K., "ALCOVE : An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning", Psychological Review, 99(1), pp.22~44 (1992)
- Manns, J. R., "Standard delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Animal Behavior Process, 28, pp.32~37 (2002)
- Okada, T., "Naming of animals and tools : A functional magnetic resonance imagine study of categorical differences in the human brain areas commonly used for naming visually presented objects", Neuroscience Letters, 296, pp.33~36 (2000)
- Pajula, J., "How many is enough? Effect of sample size in inter-subject correlation analysis of fMRI", Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (2016)
- Cyril R. Pernet, "Single-Trial Analyses: Why Bother?", Frontiers in Psychology, 2, pp.322~ (2011), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
- Pothos, E. M., "A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization", Cognitive Science, 26, pp.303~343 (2002)
- Rajah, M. N., "Overlap in the functional neural systems involved in semantic and episodic memory retrieval", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), pp.470~483 (2005)
- Raposo, A., "Repetition suppression and semantic enhancement : An investigation of the neural correlates of priming", Neuropsychologia, 44(12), pp.2284~2295 (2006)
- Rosch, E., "Cognition and Categorization" (1978), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Saumier, D., "Semantic Memory", Current science inc, 2, pp.516~522 (2002)
- Slotnick, S., "Distinct prefrontal cortex activity associated with item memory and source memory for visual shapes", Cognitive Brain Research, 17, pp.75~82 (2003)
- Thompson-Schill, S. L., "Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory : inferring"how"from"where"", Neuropsychologia, 41, pp.280~292 (2003)
- Richard J. Tunney, "An ERP Analysis of Recognition and Categorization Decisions in a Prototype-Distortion Task", PLoS ONE, 5(4), pp.e10116~ (2010), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., "Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain", NeuroImage, 15(1), pp.273~289 (2002)
- Ungerer, F., "An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics" (2006), Routledge
- Wagner, A. D., "The Cognitive Neurosciences" (2004), Bradford Books